Skip to content

· Private foundation

Crutcher Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$408k
Granted FY2021
62
Grants FY2021
9
States reached
$50k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Crutcher Family Foundation Inc’s FY2022 grant dollars went to Blue Grass Community Foundation Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2022 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2021, the last year Crutcher Family Foundation Inc named its own grantees at scale: 37 organizations, $408k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

22
’17
24
’18
26
’19
32
’20
37
’21
0
’22

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Philanthropy$5.1MEnvironment$274kHuman Services$220kArts & Culture$215kEducation$91kReligion$74kAnimals$29kHealth$22kOther$0
02FY2021 · 62 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k51 grants · $123k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $85k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $200k
$1,500
Median grant
9
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$50,000
TOWNBRANCH COMMONS PROJECT$50,000
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY OF KY$50,000
LOUISVILLE CENTRAL COMMUNITY CENTER$50,000
SHAKER VILLAGE OF PLEASANT HILL$25,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
CASA OF LEXINGTON$10,000
CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT$10,000
VIPASSANA COMMUNITY FNDN$10,000
ALICE LLOYD COLLEGE$10,000
BERHEIM ARBORETUM & RESEARCH FOREST$10,000
SHADOW'S FUND$8,500
GOD'S PANTRY$6,500
GARDEN CLUB OF LEXINGTON$6,500
BLUE GRASS CHARITY FDN$6,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $33k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%REACH FOR HOME: $1k → 9%CASA OF LEXINGTON: $10k → 15%CASA OF LEXINGTON: $5k → 15%CASA OF LEXINGTON: $5k → 15%CASA OF LEXINGTON: $4k → 15%CASA OF LEXINGTON: $4k → 15%BLUEGRASS CARE NAVIGATORS: $1k → 15%BLUEGRASS CARE NAVIGATORS: $1k → 15%BLUEGRASS CARE NAVIGATORS: $1k → 15%BLUEGRASS CARE NAVIGATORS: $1k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
WA
CA
KY
TN
DC
LA
AL
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 62 repeat orgs$82k to everyone else

62 repeat relationships: 47 still active in FY2021, 15 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call). Read against FY2021, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

62
12

Total granted

$1.2M
$47k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+60%
+86%

Still filing today

56%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21
EducationEnvironmentHuman ServicesArts & CultureHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LC
    LOUISVILLE CENTRAL COMMUNITY CENTERINC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $168k · revenue +87%
  • SA
    SHAKERTOWN AT PLEASANT HILL KENTUCKY INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $55k · revenue +39%
  • AL
    ALICE LLOYD COLLEGE
    5× · 2017–2021 · $45k · revenue +152%

Funded once

  • NC
    NATURE CONSERVANCY - CRUTCHER PRESERVE UPKEEP
    one grant, 2017 · $30k
  • CN
    CATHOLIC NEWMAN CENTER
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • GF
    GREENPECE FUND
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Commerce Lexington Inc

To represent our members, creating the environment and opportunity for economic prosperity and quality living in central kentucky.

—
2
The Land Trust for Tennessee Inc

To conserve the unique character of tennessee's natural and historic landscapes and sites for future generations.

Environment
3
Bartlett Arboretum Association Inc

To cultivate and develop an expansive collection of trees, gardens, and plants for all to explore, enjoy and study; and to provide through education and stewardship, a greener, healthier, more beautiful environment.

Environment
4
Civiclex Incorporated

Civiclex strengthens civic health in lexington, kentucky, by helping our community understand and get involved in local issues, connect with their neighbors and make decisions in a better way.

Arts & Culture
5
Kentucky Center for Economic Policy Inc

To improve the quality of life for all kentuckians through research, education and advocacy on important policy issues facing the commonwealth.

Public Benefit
6
Legacy Greenscapes Inc

Legacy greenscapes, inc. mission is to provide continuing leadership and financial support to preserve legacy of and promote greenscapes located in the city of winchester, clark county, ky.

Environment
7
Land Conservancy of West Michigan

Our mission is conserving West Michigans ecologically critical land. We protect land by creating public nature preserves, providing support to communities and local governments in creating natural areas, and helping private landowners…

Environment
8
Lexington Public Library

Our mission is to enrich and connect our community through welcoming spaces, engaged staff, diverse resources, and lifelong learning opportunities. we create a stronger community by meeting our customers where and how they need us and…

Education
9
Lake Champlain Land Trust Inc

The mission of the lake champlain land trust is to save the scenic beauty, natural communities, and recreational amenities of lake champlain by permanently preserving significant islands, shoreline areas, and natural communities in the…

Environment
10
Old Ladies Home D/B/a Ashland Terrace

The ashland terrace staff and board of directors are dedicated to providing a secure, friendly, affordable home to women sixty years and older. as a congregate senior living community, ashland terrace strives to nurture residents…

—
11
Kentucky Harvest Inc

Kentucky harvest's purpose is to end local hunger by connecting with food donors and engaging volunteers to rescue excess food and move it from those who have it to those in need.

Food & Nutrition
12
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Blue Grass Community Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Hope Spay Neuter Clinic. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

49 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 49 of the 90 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
17
Early backer (in before they grew)
48/49
Grantees still filing
40/49
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BLUE GRASS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $5,103,996 · PhilanthropyBLUE GRASS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC+1 more: $6,500 · PhilanthropyIndividual grant recipient: $250,000 · OtherIndividual gra…THE NATURE CONSERVANCY OF KY: $150,700 · OtherTHE NATURE CON…TOWNBRANCH COMMONS PROJECT: $132,000 · OtherTOWNBRANCH COM…NATURE CONSERVANCY - CRUTCHER PRESERVE UPKEEP: $30,000 · OtherVipassana Community Foundation: $31,000 · Other+57 more: $245,250 · Other+57 moreLOUISVILLE CENTRAL COMMUNITY CENTERINC: $167,500 · Recreation & SportsSHAKERTOWN AT PLEASANT HILL KENTUCKY INC: $55,000 · Arts & CultureTHE LIVING ARTS & SCIENCE CENTER INC: $7,500 · Arts & CultureOPERA HOUSE ARTS: $5,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $1,500 · Arts & CultureALICE LLOYD COLLEGE: $45,000 · EducationMIDWAY UNIVERSITY INC FKA MIDWAY COLLEGE: $5,000 · EducationCARNEGIE LITERACY CENTER INC CARNEGIE CENTER FOR LITERACY & LEARNING: $5,000 · EducationHINDMAN SETTLEMENT SCHOOL INC: $5,000 · Education+4 more: $5,500 · EducationCHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC: $29,000 · Human ServicesCASA OF LEXINGTON INC: $28,000 · Human ServicesHospice of the Bluegrass Inc: $4,000 · Human ServicesLEXINGTON RESCUE MISSION: $3,000 · Human Services+2 more: $1,500 · Human ServicesISAAC W BERNHEIM FOUNDATION: $23,500 · EnvironmentISLAND HERITAGE TRUST INC: $13,500 · EnvironmentGARDEN CLUB OF LEXINGTON INC: $10,000 · EnvironmentTREES LEXINGTON: $4,800 · EnvironmentWATERFRONT BOTANICAL GARDENS INC: $3,750 · EnvironmentBLUEGRASS LAND CONSERVANCY INC: $3,000 · Environment+1 more: $2,000 · Environment
Philanthropy$5,110,496Other$838,950Recreation & Sports$167,500Arts & Culture$69,000Education$65,500Human Services$65,500Environment$60,550

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBLUE GRASS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $5,103,996 over 1y, 8.9% of budgetLOUISVILLE CENTRAL COMMUNITY CENTERINC: $167,500 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetSHAKERTOWN AT PLEASANT HILL KENTUCKY INC: $55,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetALICE LLOYD COLLEGE: $45,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetVipassana Community Foundation: $31,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetCHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC: $29,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCASA OF LEXINGTON INC: $28,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetPINE MOUNTAIN SETTLEMENT SCHOOL: $25,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetISAAC W BERNHEIM FOUNDATION: $23,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetISLAND HERITAGE TRUST INC: $13,500 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetSHADOWS FUND INCORPORATED: $11,500 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetGARDEN CLUB OF LEXINGTON INC: $10,000 over 5y, 5.8% of budgetTHE HOPE CENTER INC: $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMaine Center for Coastal Fisheries: $7,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE LIVING ARTS & SCIENCE CENTER INC: $7,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetBLUEGRASS CHARITY FOUNDATION INC FKA BLUEGRASS CHARITY BALL INC: $6,500 over 1y, 15% of budgetCARE4Paws Inc: $6,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetPARIYATTI: $6,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetOPERA HOUSE ARTS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSeedleaf Inc: $5,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetMIDWAY UNIVERSITY INC FKA MIDWAY COLLEGE: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCARNEGIE LITERACY CENTER INC CARNEGIE CENTER FOR LITERACY & LEARNING: $5,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHINDMAN SETTLEMENT SCHOOL INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHospice of the Bluegrass Inc: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWATERFRONT BOTANICAL GARDENS INC: $3,750 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLEXINGTON RESCUE MISSION: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR WOMEN CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBLUEGRASS LAND CONSERVANCY INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHENRY CLAY MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetHOUSE OF TULIP: $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY FARM ALLIANCE INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF GREATER SANTA BARBARA: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE SPAY NEUTER CLINIC: $1,750 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetLEXINGTON HISTORY MUSEUM INC: $1,500 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetSAYRE SCHOOL: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL INTERSCHOLASTIC CYCLING ASSOCIATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBAYLOR SCHOOL: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEXINGTON SCHOOL INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCALM INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREFUGE FOR WOMEN INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFAYETTE ALLIANCE FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWOODFORD FORWARD INC: $1,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetREACH FOR HOME: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CERES COMMUNITY PROJECT: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BLUE GRASS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LOUISVILLE CENTRAL COMMUNITY CENTERINC ↗
  • Who funds SHAKERTOWN AT PLEASANT HILL KENTUCKY INC ↗
  • Who funds ALICE LLOYD COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Vipassana Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF LEXINGTON INC ↗
  • Who funds PINE MOUNTAIN SETTLEMENT SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds ISAAC W BERNHEIM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ISLAND HERITAGE TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds SHADOWS FUND INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds GARDEN CLUB OF LEXINGTON INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HOPE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Maine Center for Coastal Fisheries ↗
  • Who funds THE LIVING ARTS & SCIENCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF LEXINGTON INC ↗
  • Who funds BLUEGRASS CHARITY FOUNDATION INC FKA BLUEGRASS CHARITY BALL INC ↗
  • Who funds CARE4Paws Inc ↗
  • Who funds PARIYATTI ↗
  • Who funds OPERA HOUSE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds Seedleaf Inc ↗
  • Who funds MIDWAY UNIVERSITY INC FKA MIDWAY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds CARNEGIE LITERACY CENTER INC CARNEGIE CENTER FOR LITERACY & LEARNING ↗
  • Who funds HINDMAN SETTLEMENT SCHOOL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Blue Grass Community Foundation IncKY56.3× affinity26 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Blue Grass Community Foundation Inc · Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels Inc · LG&E and Ku Foundation Inc · Elhapa Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Inc · Christian Word Ministries Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Depository Inc · The HEP Foundation Business Trust L Edwin Paulson Jr Trustee · Rosenstein Family Charitable Foundation Inc · W L Lyons Brown Foundation · Snowy Owl Foundation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Crutcher Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Crutcher Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    19report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 90 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Crutcher Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph