Skip to content

· Private foundation

Create a Beginning Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$24k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$32kHuman Services$23kPhilanthropy$13kArts & Culture$8kInternational$6kHealth$4kYouth Development$4kAnimals$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$407k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RACQUETUP$5,000
UKRANIAN CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY FOUND$5,000
CRANBROOK EDUCATIONAL COMMUNITY$3,000
VFW HOME FOR CHILDREN$2,500
TEAM RUBICON$2,000
KIDS ON POINT$2,000
FRIENDS IN DEED$2,000
WDET 1019 FM (DETROIT PUBLIC RADIO$750
Individual grant recipient$750
MINNESOTA PUBLIC RADIO$750
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%EVERY WOMAN'S PLACE INC: $2k → 15%FULFILLMENT FUND: $2k → 14%A GIRL LIKE ME: $100 → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OH
PA
CA
SC
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 100% of Create a Beginning Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 50% of the giving stays in MI; by stated purpose, 0%.

Create a Beginning Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

55%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$65k · 10 repeat orgs$53k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
22

Total granted

$65k
$43k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
+34%

Still filing today

60%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationPublic Safety & DisasterReligionHealthArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CRANBROOK EDUCATIONAL COMMUNITY
    8× · 2018–2025 · $13k · revenue +38%
  • KO
    KIDS ON POINT INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $5k · revenue +6%
  • HW
    Humane World for Animals Inc
    2× · 2017–2018 · $2k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • UC
    Ukrainian Catholic University Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue +98%
  • TC
    THE CATHOLIC FOUNDATION OF THE DIOCESE OF LANSING
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
  • EW
    EVERY WOMAN'S PLACE INC
    one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue -2%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Association of University Women Inc

Aauw advances gender equity for women and girls through research, education, and advocacy.

Education
2
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
3
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
4
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
5
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
6
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
7
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
8
Alumni Association of the University of Michigan

The Association is an independent worldwide organization that nurtures lifelong relationships with and among current and future Michigan alumni. As a committed partner of the University the Association offers programs of relevance and…

Education
9
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
10
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
11
DePauw University

Depauw university develops leaders the world needs through an uncommon commitment to the liberal arts. depauw's diverse and inclusive learning and living experience, distinctive in its rigorous intellectual engagement and its global and…

Education
12
University of Minnesota Foundation Investment Advisors

To provide the highest level of stewardship for university donors through professional management and oversight of the university of minnesota foundation's assets by creating a focused investment environment with clarity of purpose,…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fulfillment Fund; the most unlike its peers is Humane World for Animals Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
13/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RAQUETUP: $15,000 · OtherRAQUETUPVFW HOME FOR CHILDREN: $6,150 · OtherVFW HOME FOR CHILDRENWDET 1019 FM (DETROIT PUBLIC RADIO): $5,250 · OtherWDET 1019 FM (DETROIT PUBLIC RADIO)Individual grant recipient: $5,250 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUKRANIAN CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY FOUND: $5,000 · OtherUKRANIAN CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY FOUNDRACQUETUP: $5,000 · OtherRACQUETUPFriends In Deed: $4,066 · OtherFriends In DeedTHE CATHOLIC FOUNDATION OF THE DIOCESE OF LANSING: $3,000 · OtherMINNESOTA PUBLIC RADIO AMERICAN PUBLIC MEDIA: $3,000 · Other+16 more: $14,778 · Other+16 moreUkrainian Catholic University Foundation: $20,000 · ReligionUkrainian Catholic…CRANBROOK EDUCATIONAL COMMUNITY: $12,760 · EducationCRANBROOK ED…DONORSCHOOSEORG: $500 · EducationTEAM RUBICON INC: $7,000 · Public Safety & DisasterALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INC: $1,500 · Public Safety & DisasterCOLUMBUS FOUNDATION: $7,500 · PhilanthropyKIDS ON POINT INC: $5,000 · Recreation & SportsEVERY WOMAN'S PLACE INC: $2,276 · Human ServicesFULFILLMENT FUND: $2,000 · Human Services+1 more: $100 · Human Services
Other$66,494Religion$20,000Education$13,260Public Safety & Disaster$8,500Philanthropy$7,500Recreation & Sports$5,000Human Services$4,376

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUkrainian Catholic University Foundation: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCRANBROOK EDUCATIONAL COMMUNITY: $12,760 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCOLUMBUS FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEAM RUBICON INC: $7,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS ON POINT INC: $5,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFriends In Deed: $4,066 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMINNESOTA PUBLIC RADIO AMERICAN PUBLIC MEDIA: $3,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEVERY WOMAN'S PLACE INC: $2,276 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFULFILLMENT FUND: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $1,625 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetThe Konnection: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MICHIGAN WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA GIRL LIKE ME INC: $100 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Ukrainian Catholic University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CRANBROOK EDUCATIONAL COMMUNITY ↗
  • Who funds COLUMBUS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TEAM RUBICON INC ↗
  • Who funds KIDS ON POINT INC ↗
  • Who funds Friends In Deed ↗
  • Who funds MINNESOTA PUBLIC RADIO AMERICAN PUBLIC MEDIA ↗
  • Who funds EVERY WOMAN'S PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds FULFILLMENT FUND ↗
  • Who funds The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Humane World for Animals Inc ↗
  • Who funds ALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds The Konnection ↗
  • Who funds DONORSCHOOSEORG ↗
  • Who funds THE MICHIGAN WOMEN'S FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds A GIRL LIKE ME INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Comerica Charitable FoundationOH13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Comerica Charitable Foundation · United Way for Southeastern Michigan · DTE Energy Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Create a Beginning Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Create a Beginning Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Create a Beginning’s filings →

    More from the funding graph