Skip to content
Crawford Heritage Community Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Community foundation

Crawford Heritage Community Foundation

A community foundation established to provide a framework for charitable giving to local worthy causes in crawford county, pennsylvania.

$1.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
38
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$223k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Employment$623kHuman Services$615kHealth$614kEducation$514kReligion$410kEnvironment$304kArts & Culture$226kMembership Benefit$147kOther$0
02FY2024 · 38 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 38 grants below total $742,715, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,135,440 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $392,725 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k13 grants · $92k
  • $10k–50k24 grants · $428k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $223k
$11,732
Median grant
8
States reached
$40M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CRAWFORD COUNTY CAREER AND TECHNICAL CENTER$223,044
ENERGY AND MINERAL LAW FOUNDATION$42,428
MEADVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARY$35,593
WOMEN'S SERVICES INC$26,378
WESBURY UNITED METHODIST COMMUNITY$25,913
MEADVILLE MEDICAL CENTER$25,408
UNITED WAY OF WESTERN CRAWFORD COUNTY$22,771
WESTAR INSTITUTE$21,220
CHAUTAUQUA INSTITUTION$21,220
FRENCH CREEK VALLEY CONSERVANCY$20,410
MEADVILLE AREA FREE CLINIC$16,886
ALLEGHENY COLLEGE$15,734
GREENDALE CEMETERY ASSOCIATION$15,000
CRAWFORD COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY$13,712
BLOOMING VALLEY CEMETERY ASSOCIATION$12,924
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $218k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ST PAUL'S HOME: $13k → 13%LOVE IN THE NAME OF CHRIST: $8k → 14%ST PAUL'S HOME: $12k → 13%ST PAUL'S HOME: $12k → 13%ST PAUL'S HOME: $12k → 13%ST PAUL'S HOME: $11k → 13%ST PAUL'S HOME: $11k → 13%ST PAUL'S HOME: $11k → 13%ST PAUL'S HOME: $11k → 13%CENTER FOR FAMILY SERVICES INC: $17k → 14%CENTER FOR FAMILY SERVICES INC: $16k → 14%CENTER FOR FAMILY SERVICES INC: $14k → 14%CENTER FOR FAMILY SERVICES INC: $13k → 14%CENTER FOR FAMILY SERVICES INC: $8k → 14%YMCA OF MEADVILLE: $7k → 14%YMCA OF MEADVILLE: $7k → 14%YMCA OF MEADVILLE: $7k → 14%YMCA OF MEADVILLE: $6k → 14%YMCA OF MEADVILLE: $6k → 14%YMCA OF MEADVILLE: $6k → 14%CENTER FOR FAMILY SERVICES INC: $5k → 14%CENTER FOR FAMILY SERVICES INC: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
MA
OR
PA
KY
DC
OK
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.5M · 40 repeat orgs$365k to everyone else

40 repeat relationships: 35 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

40
15

Total granted

$3.5M
$122k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+34%

Still filing today

70%
73%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $243k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesPhilanthropyEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MP
    MEADVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $246k · revenue +10%
  • TW
    THE WESBURY FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $194k · revenue +9%
  • MM
    MEADVILLE MEDICAL CENTER
    8× · 2017–2024 · $174k · revenue +48%

Funded once

  • BF
    BPS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
  • BV
    BLOOMING VALLEY CEMETERY ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2023 · $13k
  • W
    WITHALLgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +46%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christian Care Retirement Apartments Inc

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve

—
2
Christian Care Mesa Ii Inc

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve.

Housing & Shelter
3
Christian Care Mesa Inc

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve.

Human Services
4
Chester County Hospital & Health System

The provision of management services to the chester county hospital and its affiliates.

Health
5
Wrc Pennsylvania Memorial Home

Wrc pennsylvania memorial home's mission is to provide choices for generations. built on a not-for-profit foundation of caring, the organization offers residential and personal care, home and community-based services, skilled and…

Health
6
Craftsbury Community Care Center

Residential care home for elderly and handicapped.

Human Services
7
Uncompahgre Combined Clinics

To provide quality, cost-effective, accessible, and affordable healthcare to the community.

Health
8
Wayne Memorial Hospital

It is the mission of wayne memorial hospital to provide quality healthcare with compassion, advocacy, respect, excellence, and service; to promote wellness in our community; and to be proactive in responding to our community's needs.

Health
9
Wayne Memorial Health System Inc

Wayne memorial health system strives to be the provider of first choice for community health care in wayne, pike, and susquehanna counties, and the greater carbondale and forest city regions of northeast pennsylvania.

Health
10
Central Maine Medical Center

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustfulenvironment through the expertise, commitment and compassion of ourfamily of caregivers.

Health
11
Penn State Health Hampden Medical Center

Penn state health hampden medical center's mission is to continually improve the health and well-being of the people in pennsylvania. the organization provides patients with excellent, compassionate and culturally responsive and equitable…

Health
12
Christian Care Surprise Inc

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chautauqua Institution; the most unlike its peers is Wins Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
40/40
Grantees still filing
28/40
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CRAWFORD COUNTY CAREER AND TECHNICAL CENTER: $399,540 · OtherCRAWFORD COUNTY CAREER AND TECHNICAL CENTERCRAWFORD COUNTY CAREER AND TECHNICAL CENTER: $223,044 · OtherCRAWFORD COUNTY CAREER AND TECHNICAL CENTERWestar Institute: $134,329 · OtherWestar InstituteORCHARD MANOR INC: $94,600 · OtherPARK CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH: $82,998 · OtherFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF GREENVILLE: $82,975 · OtherST PAULS REFORMED CHURCH: $81,322 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSS: $79,311 · OtherWOMEN'S SERVICES INC: $76,337 · OtherFAMILY CHILDREN & COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION: $71,577 · Other+23 more: $523,410 · Other+23 moreMEADVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARY: $245,745 · EducationMEADVILLE PUBLI…ALLEGHENY COLLEGE: $133,481 · EducationALLEGHENY COLLE…The King's College: $70,698 · EducationThe King's Coll…DERBY ACADEMY TRUSTEES: $30,000 · EducationDERBY ACADEMY T…+3 more: $28,839 · Education+3 moreMEADVILLE MEDICAL CENTER: $173,653 · HealthMEADVILLE MEDI…TITUSVILLE AREA HOSPITAL: $133,615 · HealthTITUSVILLE ARE…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $89,828 · HealthAMERICAN CANCE…SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $61,527 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPI…MEADVILLE AREA FREE CLINIC: $22,424 · Health+2 more: $15,000 · HealthENERGY & MINERAL LAW FOUNDATION: $263,102 · Crime & LegalTHE WESBURY FOUNDATION: $194,038 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF WESTERN CRAWFORD COUNTY: $66,798 · PhilanthropyCHAUTAUQUA INSTITUTION: $131,560 · Arts & CultureCRAWFORD COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $82,294 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $12,402 · Arts & CultureST PAUL HOMES: $93,603 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR FAMILY SERVICES INC: $77,874 · Human ServicesMEADVILLE AREA FAMILY YMCA: $38,870 · Human ServicesLOVE IN THE NAME OF CHRIST: $8,050 · Human Services
Other$1,849,443Education$508,763Health$496,047Crime & Legal$263,102Philanthropy$260,836Arts & Culture$226,256Human Services$218,397

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetENERGY & MINERAL LAW FOUNDATION: $263,102 over 8y, 34% of budgetMEADVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARY: $245,745 over 8y, 4.6% of budgetTHE WESBURY FOUNDATION: $194,038 over 8y, 3.4% of budgetMEADVILLE MEDICAL CENTER: $173,653 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWestar Institute: $134,329 over 8y, 5.7% of budgetTITUSVILLE AREA HOSPITAL: $133,615 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetALLEGHENY COLLEGE: $133,481 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCHAUTAUQUA INSTITUTION: $131,560 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetORCHARD MANOR INC: $94,600 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetST PAUL HOMES: $93,603 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $89,828 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCRAWFORD COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $82,294 over 8y, 8.2% of budgetCENTER FOR FAMILY SERVICES INC: $77,874 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetWOMEN'S SERVICES INC: $76,337 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetFAMILY CHILDREN & COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION: $71,577 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetThe King's College: $70,698 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF WESTERN CRAWFORD COUNTY: $66,798 over 3y, 13% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $61,527 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGREENDALE CEMETERY ASSOCIATION: $51,520 over 5y, 6.3% of budgetFRENCH CREEK VALLEY CONSERVANCY: $40,536 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetMEADVILLE AREA FAMILY YMCA: $38,870 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetDERBY ACADEMY TRUSTEES: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHospice of Crawford County Inc: $22,994 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetMEADVILLE AREA FREE CLINIC: $22,424 over 2y, 5.6% of budgetFRENCH CREEK RECREATIONAL TRAILS INC: $18,557 over 2y, 4.8% of budgetCRAWFORD COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $16,481 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetMEADVILLE MARTIN LUTHER KING JR SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $16,339 over 2y, 9.2% of budgetWINS PROJECT INC: $16,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetWITHALL: $10,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetLOVE IN THE NAME OF CHRIST: $8,050 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetCRAWFORD COUNTY COALITION ON HOUSING NEEDS INC: $7,500 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetJUNIATA COLLEGE: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetACADEMY THEATRE FOUNDATION: $7,402 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF TITUSVILLE PENNSYLVANIA: $7,180 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetACTIVE AGING INC: $6,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSt James Haven Inc: $6,000 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF NW PA INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCRAWFORD COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH AWARENESS PROGRAM INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDALLAS CHAMBER SYMPHONY: $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ENERGY & MINERAL LAW FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MEADVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds THE WESBURY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MEADVILLE MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Westar Institute ↗
  • Who funds TITUSVILLE AREA HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds ALLEGHENY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds CHAUTAUQUA INSTITUTION ↗
  • Who funds ORCHARD MANOR INC ↗
  • Who funds ST PAUL HOMES ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds CRAWFORD COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY CHILDREN & COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds The King's College ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF WESTERN CRAWFORD COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds GREENDALE CEMETERY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds FRENCH CREEK VALLEY CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds MEADVILLE AREA FAMILY YMCA ↗
  • Who funds DERBY ACADEMY TRUSTEES ↗
  • Who funds Hospice of Crawford County Inc ↗
  • Who funds MEADVILLE AREA FREE CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds FRENCH CREEK RECREATIONAL TRAILS INC ↗
  • Who funds CRAWFORD COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds MEADVILLE MARTIN LUTHER KING JR SCHOLARSHIP FUND ↗
  • Who funds WINS PROJECT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Western…Harry Winslow Foundat…Northwest Charitable …Ainsworth FoundationRdl Family FoundationBenevolent & Protecti…Ljl Family FoundationFirstenergy FoundationLang Family FoundationThe Pittsburgh Founda…The US Charitable Gif…Gs Donor Advised Phil…
United Way of Western Crawford CountyPA24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Western Crawford County · Harry Winslow Foundation · Northwest Charitable Foundation · Ainsworth Foundation · Rdl Family Foundation · Benevolent & Protective Order of Elks Lodge 219 · Ljl Family Foundation · Firstenergy Foundation · Lang Family Foundation · The Pittsburgh Foundation · The US Charitable Gift Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Crawford Heritage Community Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Crawford Heritage Community Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
17report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 58 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Crawford Heritage’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home