· Community foundation
Crawford Heritage Community Foundation
A community foundation established to provide a framework for charitable giving to local worthy causes in crawford county, pennsylvania.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 38 grants below total $742,715 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,135,440 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $392,725 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k13 grants · $92k
- $10k–50k24 grants · $428k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $223k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CRAWFORD COUNTY CAREER AND TECHNICAL CENTER | $223,044 |
| ENERGY AND MINERAL LAW FOUNDATION | $42,428 |
| MEADVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARY | $35,593 |
| WOMEN'S SERVICES INC | $26,378 |
| WESBURY UNITED METHODIST COMMUNITY | $25,913 |
| MEADVILLE MEDICAL CENTER | $25,408 |
| UNITED WAY OF WESTERN CRAWFORD COUNTY | $22,771 |
| WESTAR INSTITUTE | $21,220 |
| CHAUTAUQUA INSTITUTION | $21,220 |
| FRENCH CREEK VALLEY CONSERVANCY | $20,410 |
| MEADVILLE AREA FREE CLINIC | $16,886 |
| ALLEGHENY COLLEGE | $15,734 |
| GREENDALE CEMETERY ASSOCIATION | $15,000 |
| CRAWFORD COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY | $13,712 |
| BLOOMING VALLEY CEMETERY ASSOCIATION | $12,924 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $218k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
40 repeat relationships — 35 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $243k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MPMEADVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARY8× · 2017–2024 · $246k · revenue +10%
- TWTHE WESBURY FOUNDATION8× · 2017–2024 · $194k · revenue +9%
- MMMEADVILLE MEDICAL CENTER8× · 2017–2024 · $174k · revenue +48%
Funded once
- BFBPS FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $20k
- BVBLOOMING VALLEY CEMETERY ASSOCIATIONone grant, 2023 · $13k
- WWITHALLgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +46%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve
Residential care home for elderly and handicapped.
Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve.
Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve.
The provision of management services to the chester county hospital and its affiliates.
Wrc pennsylvania memorial home's mission is to provide choices for generations. built on a not-for-profit foundation of caring, the organization offers residential and personal care, home and community-based services, skilled and…
It is the mission of wayne memorial hospital to provide quality healthcare with compassion, advocacy, respect, excellence, and service; to promote wellness in our community; and to be proactive in responding to our community's needs.
To provide quality, cost-effective, accessible, and affordable healthcare to the community.
Wayne memorial health system strives to be the provider of first choice for community health care in wayne, pike, and susquehanna counties, and the greater carbondale and forest city regions of northeast pennsylvania.
Mclaren health care, through its subsidiaries, will be the best value in health care as defined by quality outcomes and cost.
To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustfulenvironment through the expertise, commitment and compassion of ourfamily of caregivers.
Inspiring healthy living by providing exceptional health and life services for every person, every time.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chautauqua Institution and the most unlike its peers is Wins Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 48 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ENERGY & MINERAL LAW FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MEADVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
- Who funds THE WESBURY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MEADVILLE MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds Westar Institute ↗
- Who funds TITUSVILLE AREA HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds ALLEGHENY COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds CHAUTAUQUA INSTITUTION ↗
- Who funds ORCHARD MANOR INC ↗
- Who funds ST PAUL HOMES ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds CRAWFORD COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds WOMEN'S SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY CHILDREN & COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds The King's College ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF WESTERN CRAWFORD COUNTY ↗
- Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds GREENDALE CEMETERY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds FRENCH CREEK VALLEY CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds MEADVILLE AREA FAMILY YMCA ↗
- Who funds DERBY ACADEMY TRUSTEES ↗
- Who funds Hospice of Crawford County Inc ↗
- Who funds MEADVILLE AREA FREE CLINIC ↗
- Who funds FRENCH CREEK RECREATIONAL TRAILS INC ↗
- Who funds CRAWFORD COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds MEADVILLE MARTIN LUTHER KING JR SCHOLARSHIP FUND ↗
- Who funds WINS PROJECT INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: United Way of Western Crawford County · Harry Winslow Foundation · Northwest Charitable Foundation · Ainsworth Foundation · Rdl Family Foundation · Benevolent & Protective Order of Elks Lodge 219 · Ljl Family Foundation · Firstenergy Foundation · Lang Family Foundation · The Pittsburgh Foundation · The US Charitable Gift Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Crawford Heritage Community Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Shriners Hospitals for Children — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.