How much did CRAWFORD HERITAGE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 53% of CRAWFORD HERITAGE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

achieve

2019

—

2020

homelessmental healthadvocatingachieve

2021

hospiceyounggoodachieve

2022

northwestfoodhospicestudentschildachieve

2023

recreationalfrench creekprotectionhospicebodymindspirit

2024

protectionrecreationalhospicechildachieve

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 38 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k13 grants · $92k
$10k–50k24 grants · $428k
$50k–250k1 grant · $223k

$11,732

Median grant

States reached

$40M

Total assets

Largest grants

CRAWFORD COUNTY CAREER AND TECHNICAL CENTER$223,044
ENERGY AND MINERAL LAW FOUNDATION$42,428
MEADVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARY$35,593
WOMEN'S SERVICES INC$26,378
WESBURY UNITED METHODIST COMMUNITY$25,913
MEADVILLE MEDICAL CENTER$25,408
UNITED WAY OF WESTERN CRAWFORD COUNTY$22,771
CHAUTAUQUA INSTITUTION$21,220
WESTAR INSTITUTE$21,220
FRENCH CREEK VALLEY CONSERVANCY$20,410
MEADVILLE AREA FREE CLINIC$16,886
ALLEGHENY COLLEGE$15,734
GREENDALE CEMETERY ASSOCIATION$15,000
CRAWFORD COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY$13,712
BLOOMING VALLEY CEMETERY ASSOCIATION$12,924

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $218k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13% — the area typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$3.5M · 40 repeat orgs$365k to everyone else

40 repeat relationships — 35 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$3.5M

$122k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%

+37%

Still filing today

68%

73%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $243k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthEducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesPhilanthropyEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

WU
WESBURY UNITED METHODIST COMMUNITY
8× · 2017–2024 · $194k · revenue +9%
MM
MEADVILLE MEDICAL CENTER
8× · 2017–2024 · $174k · revenue +19%
TA
TITUSVILLE AREA HOSPITAL
8× · 2017–2024 · $134k · revenue +95%

Funded once

BF
BPS FOUNDATION
one grant, 2023 · $20k
BV
BLOOMING VALLEY CEMETERY ASSOCIATION
one grant, 2023 · $13k
W
WITHALLgraduated
one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +82%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Upmc Chautauqua At Wca

To improve the health and well-being of the people of chautauqua county and the surrounding area in a way that includes compassion, dedication, a commitment to quality and patient safety while maintaining economic viability and a vision…

Health

Central Pennsylvania Clinic- a Medical

Diagnosis and treatment of, and providing primary and subspecialty care for special children and adults with genetic diseases.

Health

Millcreek Community Hospital

The organization provides the community with healthcare services and education.

Health

Meredith College

Founded in 1891, meredith is one of the largest women's colleges in the southeast. meredith offers comprehensive liberal arts and professional studies for undergraduate women. at the graduate level, meredith offers co-educational mba,…

Education

Reedsburg Area Medical Center

Provide quality, compassionate, & effective health care going beyond the expected in all we do.

Health

Cedar Crest College

Liberal arts college primarily for women dedicated to educating the next generation of leaders.

Education

Wartburg College

Wartburg college provides educational programs and experiences that challenge and nurture students for lives of leadership and service as a spirited expression of their faith and learning.

Education

Pennsylvania College of Health Sciences

The college's mission is to educate for excellence in healthcare practice, leadership, and the continuous acquisition of knowledge.

—

Gettysburg College

Gettysburg college is a residential, undergraduate college of the liberal arts and sciences.

Education

Chambersburg Hospital

To improve the health and well-being of the people in southcentral pennsylvania.

Health

Wayne Memorial Hospital

Wayne memorial hospital is a non-profit, community-controlled hospital that strives to offer the highest quality in inpatient and outpatient medical care.

Health

The Christ Hospital

Improve the health of our community and create patient value by providing exceptional outcomes and the finest experiences, all in an affordable way.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Active Aging Inc and the most unlike its peers is Juniata College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 52 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 6% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/55

the rest of the field

346/5,763

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

39 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

39/39

Grantees still filing

28/39

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$2,053,452Education$508,763Health$496,047Philanthropy$260,836Arts & Culture$226,256Human Services$218,397Environment$59,093

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Western Crawford CountyPA24.7× affinity9 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Western Crawford County · Harry Winslow Foundation · Ainsworth Foundation · Ljl Family Foundation · Firstenergy Foundation · Lang Family Foundation · Rdl Family Foundation · The US Charitable Gift Trust · The Pittsburgh Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation CRAWFORD HERITAGE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

1get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: WINS PROJECT INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

4 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 465281801 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on WINS PROJECT INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 17% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Crawford Heritage Community Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Crawford Heritage Community Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

CRAWFORD HERITAGE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

39 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Crawford Heritage Community Foundation?

More from the funding graph

CRAWFORD HERITAGE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

39 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Crawford Heritage Community Foundation?

More from the funding graph