Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Ljl Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$249k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Human Services$188kHealth$129kHousing & Shelter$95kEnvironment$79kPhilanthropy$65kEducation$63kRecreation & Sports$45kArts & Culture$41kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $3k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $197k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$17,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WEST MEAD #1 VFC$50,000
CONNEAUT LAKE AQUATIC MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION$39,000
COMMON ROOTS$25,000
BETHESDA FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN$25,000
CRAWFORD COUNTY YOUTH HOCKEY ASSOCIATION$20,000
FRENCH CREEK VALLEY CONSERVANCY$20,000
WEST END ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$17,500
CRAWFORD COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY$10,000
CRAWFORD HERITAGE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$10,000
ST JAMES HAVEN$10,000
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK$10,000
MEADVILLE MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$10,000
BLACK ASH CEMETARY ASSOCIATION$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $91k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%WOODLANDS FOUNDATION: $11k → 11%BETHESDA FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN: $25k → 15%COMMON ROOTS: $25k → 14%CENTER FOR FAMILY SERVICES: $15k → 14%COMMON ROOTS: $10k → 14%CENTER FOR FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$577k · 13 repeat orgs$162k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +44% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
10

Total granted

$577k
$107k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
0%

Still filing today

77%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $55k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesAnimalsHealthEnvironmentEducationCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SJ
    St James Haven Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $60k · revenue +125%
  • CL
    CONNEAUT LAKE AQUATIC MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION INC
    4× · 2021–2025 · $59k · revenue +46%
  • AA
    ACTIVE AGING FOUNDATION
    4× · 2020–2023 · $40k · revenue +113%

Funded once

  • EZ
    Erie Zoological Society
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue 0%
  • MA
    MEADVILLE AREA RECREATION FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue -37%
  • CC
    CRAWFORD COUNTY SCHOOL FOR ADULT EDUCATION
    one grant, 2022 · $20k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Franklin County Historical Society- Kittochtinny

The objective of the franklin county historical society - kittochtinny shall be to foster increased knowledge of the history of franklin county and the cumberland valley through a museum and library, to publish papers of the corporation at…

2
Pocono Heritage Land Trust

The trust is dedicated to protecting the natural heritage of the pocono mountains region, in northeastern pennsylvaina, by conserving land and inspiring people to care for, enjoy, and explore their natural world.

Environment
3
Cedar Falls Historical Society

Engaging the community in the preservation, education and celebration of our heritage.

4
Centre County United Way

To improve lives by prioritizing needs and mobilizing human and financial resources to positively impact the education, financial stability, and physical and emotional health of our neighbors.

5
Cranberry Township Emergency Medical Service

To preserve life and promote health and safety in our community.

Health
6
Chestnut Hill Conservancy

The Chestnut Hill Conservancy conserves, preserves, and celebrates history, architecture, and landscapes in Chestnut Hill and the lower Wissahickon watershed through inclusive and proactive community engagement, advocacy, and stewardship.

Arts & Culture
7
Community Fire Company of Cornwall Borough

Volunteer firefighting

Public Safety & Disaster
8
Bright's Creek Conservancy Inc

Conservation efforts to study and maintain brights creek in canadensis, pa.

Environment
9
Valley View Haven Inc Dba Valley View Retirement Community

Valley view haven d/b/a valley view retirement community, is a not-for-profit corporation as described in section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code. valley view haven's mission is to provide a continuum of quality residential and long…

Housing & Shelter
10
Cumberland Valley Animal Shelter Inc

Provide shelter for homeless animals and prevent animal cruelty

Animals
11
Clinton County Healthy Communities

The clinton county healthy communities's is a not-for-profit organization that provides healthy family activities and programs to promote positive health outcomes and to provide quality oral health care services to low income residents of…

Health
12
Community Foundation of the Mahoning Valley

The community foundation is the leader and advocate for strategic philanthropy, partnering with donors to anchor a permanent and growing endowment making investments in the mahoning valley that improve the quality of life for all residents.

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Crawford Heritage Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Erie Zoological Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number16%0%<5yr12%17%5–10yr18%4%10–20yr19%26%20–35yr17%30%35–55yr18%22%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value16%0%<5yr12%14%5–10yr18%0%10–20yr19%42%20–35yr17%22%35–55yr18%22%55yr+

The field is 16% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 7% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/23
the rest of the field
7%
894/12,410

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
12/20
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WEST MEAD #1 VFC — $100,000 · OtherWEST MEAD #1 VFCSt James Haven Inc — $60,000 · OtherSt James Haven IncWOMEN'S SERVICES INC — $40,000 · OtherWOMEN'S SERVICES INCSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK — $30,000 · OtherSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANKBLACK ASH CEMETARY ASSOCIATION — $20,100 · OtherMEADVILLE AREA RECREATION FOUNDATION — $20,000 · OtherCRAWFORD COUNTY SCHOOL FOR ADULT EDUCATION — $20,000 · OtherErie Zoological Society — $25,000 · OtherErie Zoological SocietyCRAWFORD COUNTY YOUTH HOCKEY ASSOC INC — $25,000 · OtherCRAWFORD COUNTY YOUTH HOCKEY ASSOC INC+7 more — $41,000 · Other+7 moreMEADVILLE MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $90,000 · HealthMEADVILLE MEDICA…COVENANT HOUSE INC — $25,000 · HealthCOVENANT HOUSE I…COMMON ROOTS — $35,000 · Human ServicesCOMMON ROOTSBETHESDA FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN — $25,000 · Human ServicesBETHESDA FOU…CENTER FOR FAMILY SERVICES INC — $20,000 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR F…WOODLANDS FOUNDATION INC — $11,000 · Human ServicesWOODLANDS FO…CONNEAUT LAKE AQUATIC MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION INC — $59,000 · EnvironmentCONNEAUT LA…FRENCH CREEK VALLEY CONSERVANCY — $20,000 · EnvironmentFRENCH CREE…CRAWFORD HERITAGE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $65,000 · PhilanthropyCRAWFORD …ACTIVE AGING FOUNDATION — $40,000 · Community ImprovementWEST END ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PTO — $32,500 · Education
Other$381,100Health$115,000Human Services$91,000Environment$79,000Philanthropy$65,000Community Improvement$40,000Education$32,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMEADVILLE MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $90,000 over 5y, 4.6% of budgetCRAWFORD HERITAGE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $65,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetSt James Haven Inc — $60,000 over 6y, 9.9% of budgetCONNEAUT LAKE AQUATIC MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION INC — $59,000 over 4y, 13% of budgetACTIVE AGING FOUNDATION — $40,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetWOMEN'S SERVICES INC — $40,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetCOMMON ROOTS — $35,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetWEST END ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PTO — $32,500 over 2y, 35% of budgetBETHESDA FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN — $25,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetErie Zoological Society — $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCRAWFORD COUNTY YOUTH HOCKEY ASSOC INC — $25,000 over 2y, 16% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE INC — $25,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCENTER FOR FAMILY SERVICES INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMEADVILLE AREA RECREATION FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetWOODLANDS FOUNDATION INC — $11,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMEADVILLE COOPERATIVE PRESCHOOL — $10,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetBONEFISH & TARPON TRUST INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFIELDSTONE FARM THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rdl Family FoundationPA20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rdl Family Foundation · Ainsworth Foundation · Erie Community Foundation · Harry Winslow Foundation · Crawford Heritage Community Foundation · Benevolent & Protective Order of Elks Lodge 219 · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ljl Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ljl Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Ljl Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph