Skip to content

· Private foundation

Crab Tree Farm Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$11k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$229kPublic Benefit$181kEducation$94kRecreation & Sports$90kHuman Services$40kYouth Development$20kSocial Science$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $1k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$28M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MILLENNIUM PARK FOUNDATION$10,000
STICKLEY MUSEUM AT CRAFTSMAN FARMS$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Gorton Community Center: $20k → 8%Gorton Community Center: $20k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$640k · 12 repeat orgs$20k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against -45% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
7

Total granted

$640k
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
-45%

Still filing today

58%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    THE STICKLEY MUSEUM AT CRAFTSMAN FARMS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $124k · revenue +41%
  • TA
    THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO
    4× · 2017–2020 · $92k · revenue +45%
  • GC
    Gorton Community Center
    2× · 2017–2018 · $40k · revenue +158%

Funded once

  • TI
    THORNWILLOW INSTITUTE LTD
    one grant, 2018 · $8k · revenue -46%
  • CE
    Charles E Diehl Society
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • YU
    Yale University Press London
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Illinois State Museum Society

The illinois state museum society, established in 1952, is a charitable organization recognized as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit. it plays a crucial role in supporting the illinois state museum by providing financial resources and advocating for…

Arts & Culture
2
The Richard H Driehaus Museum

The driehaus museum engages and inspires the global community through exploration and ongoing conversations in art, architecture, and design of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. its permanent collection and temporary…

Arts & Culture
3
Norwood Park Historical Society

Preservation, conservation and restoration of a historical chicago landmark property.

—
4
Paine Art Center & Gardens Inc

Paine art center & gardens, inc. is a historic estate that serves as a multifaceted museum for learning and inspiration. the core purposes of the organization are to sustain the care of the historic architecture, collections, and gardens;…

Arts & Culture
5
Collectors Club of Chicago
—
6
Glenview History Center

Founded in 1965, the glenview history center's mission is to preserve the cultural heritage of glenview by preserving the historic 1864 farmhouse as a museum and operating the history library with its impressive collection of historical…

—
7
The Arts Club of Chicago

The arts club of chicago was formed as a means to encourage, foster, and develop higher standards of arts craftsmanship, and to maintain the city of chicago facility for the housing of galleries and exhibitions open to the public and free…

Arts & Culture
8
Tudor Place Foundation Inc

Tudor place historic house & garden preserves the stories of six generations of descendants of martha washington and the enslaved and free people who lived and worked at this georgetown landmark for nearly two centuries. by examining their…

—
9
Chicago Historical Society

The Chicago History Museum strives to be a destination for learning, inspiration, and civic engagement. Through dynamic exhibitions, tours, programs, digital resources, and special events, the Museum connects people to Chicago's history…

Arts & Culture
10
American Institute for Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works

A national membership organization in the united states dedicated to the preservation of cultural material, the american institute for conservation of historic and artistic works plays a crucial role in establishing and upholding…

Community Improvement
11
The Charnley-Persky House Museum Foundation

The foundation operates as a museum of internationally recognized architecture of louis sullivan and frank lloyd wright. a portion of the museum houses the international headquarters for the society of architectural historians (nfp).

Arts & Culture
12
Design Museum of Chicago

The Design Museum of Chicago strives to inspire, educate and innovate through design. As a resource for the Chicago design community and beyond, the museum facilitates an open dialogue about contemporary and historical design through…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Art Institute of Chicago; the most unlike its peers is Rhodes College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Illinois Executive Mansion Association: $181,302 · OtherIllinois Executive Mansion AssociationTHE STICKLEY MUSEUM AT CRAFTSMAN FARMS INC: $123,625 · OtherTHE STICKLEY MUSEUM AT CRAFTSMAN FARMS INCLAKE FOREST HISTORICAL CENTER: $40,000 · OtherLAKE FOREST HISTORICAL CENTERLake Forest Historical Society: $22,500 · OtherLake Forest Historical SocietyNEWCOMB PROJECT: $19,784 · Other+7 more: $13,191 · OtherTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $91,500 · EducationTHE ART INSTITUTE…Rhodes College: $10,000 · EducationRhodes CollegeMILLENNIUM PARK FOUNDATION: $90,000 · Recreation & SportsMILLENNIUM PARK…Gorton Community Center: $40,000 · Human ServicesNATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE UNITED STATES: $20,500 · Arts & CultureTHORNWILLOW INSTITUTE LTD: $7,500 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $500 · Arts & Culture
Other$400,402Education$101,500Recreation & Sports$90,000Human Services$40,000Arts & Culture$28,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetIllinois Executive Mansion Association: $181,302 over 5y, 49% of budgetTHE STICKLEY MUSEUM AT CRAFTSMAN FARMS INC: $123,625 over 9y, 6.0% of budgetTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $91,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMILLENNIUM PARK FOUNDATION: $90,000 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetGorton Community Center: $40,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetNATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE UNITED STATES: $20,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRhodes College: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHORNWILLOW INSTITUTE LTD: $7,500 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetLAKE FOREST FOUNDATION FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION: $1,800 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetHISTORIC NATCHEZ FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Illinois Executive Mansion Association ↗
  • Who funds THE STICKLEY MUSEUM AT CRAFTSMAN FARMS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds MILLENNIUM PARK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Gorton Community Center ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE UNITED STATES ↗
  • Who funds Rhodes College ↗
  • Who funds THORNWILLOW INSTITUTE LTD ↗
  • Who funds LAKE FOREST FOUNDATION FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION ↗
  • Who funds HISTORIC NATCHEZ FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community TrustIL12.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Crab Tree Farm Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Crab Tree Farm Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Crab Tree Farm Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Crab Tree Farm Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Crab Tree Farm’s filings →

    More from the funding graph