Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Crab Tree Farm Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$11k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Arts & Culture$229kPublic Benefit$181kEducation$94kRecreation & Sports$90kHuman Services$40kYouth Development$20kSocial Science$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $1k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$28M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MILLENNIUM PARK FOUNDATION$10,000
STICKLEY MUSEUM AT CRAFTSMAN FARMS$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–18, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Gorton Community Center: $20k → 8%Gorton Community Center: $20k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$640k · 13 repeat orgs$20k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +14% since the first grant, against -45% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
7

Total granted

$640k
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
-45%

Still filing today

54%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    THE STICKLEY MUSEUM AT CRAFTSMAN FARMS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $124k · revenue +14%
  • GC
    Gorton Community Center
    2× · 2017–2018 · $40k · revenue +158%
  • NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE UNITED STATES
    2× · 2017–2018 · $21k · revenue +133%

Funded once

  • TI
    THORNWILLOW INSTITUTE LTD
    one grant, 2018 · $8k · revenue -46%
  • CE
    Charles E Diehl Society
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • YU
    Yale University Press London
    one grant, 2019 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Illinois State Museum Society

The illinois state museum society, established in 1952, is a charitable organization recognized as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit. it plays a crucial role in supporting the illinois state museum by providing financial resources and advocating for…

Arts & Culture
2
The Richard H Driehaus Museum

The driehaus museum engages and inspires the global community through exploration and ongoing conversations in art, architecture, and design of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. its permanent collection and temporary…

Arts & Culture
3
Norwood Park Historical Society

Preservation, conservation and restoration of a historical chicago landmark property.

4
Paine Art Center & Gardens Inc

Paine art center & gardens, inc. is a historic estate that serves as a multifaceted museum for learning and inspiration. the core purposes of the organization are to sustain the care of the historic architecture, collections, and gardens;…

Arts & Culture
5
Collectors Club of Chicago
6
Glenview History Center

Founded in 1965, the glenview history center's mission is to preserve the cultural heritage of glenview by preserving the historic 1864 farmhouse as a museum and operating the history library with its impressive collection of historical…

7
The Arts Club of Chicago

The arts club of chicago was formed as a means to encourage, foster, and develop higher standards of arts craftsmanship, and to maintain the city of chicago facility for the housing of galleries and exhibitions open to the public and free…

Arts & Culture
8
Tudor Place Foundation Inc

Tudor place historic house & garden preserves the stories of six generations of descendants of martha washington and the enslaved and free people who lived and worked at this georgetown landmark for nearly two centuries. by examining their…

9
Chicago Historical Society

The Chicago History Museum strives to be a destination for learning, inspiration, and civic engagement. Through dynamic exhibitions, tours, programs, digital resources, and special events, the Museum connects people to Chicago's history…

Arts & Culture
10
American Institute for Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works

A national membership organization in the united states dedicated to the preservation of cultural material, the american institute for conservation of historic and artistic works plays a crucial role in establishing and upholding…

Community Improvement
11
The Charnley-Persky House Museum Foundation

The foundation operates as a museum of internationally recognized architecture of louis sullivan and frank lloyd wright. a portion of the museum houses the international headquarters for the society of architectural historians (nfp).

Arts & Culture
12
Design Museum of Chicago

The Design Museum of Chicago strives to inspire, educate and innovate through design. As a resource for the Chicago design community and beyond, the museum facilitates an open dialogue about contemporary and historical design through…

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Art Institute of Chicago and the most unlike its peers is Rhodes College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Illinois Executive Mansion Association — $181,302 · OtherIllinois Executive Mansion AssociationTHE STICKLEY MUSEUM AT CRAFTSMAN FARMS INC — $123,625 · OtherTHE STICKLEY MUSEUM AT CRAFTSMAN FARMS INCSchool of the Art Institute of Chicago — $80,000 · OtherSchool of the Art Institute of ChicagoLAKE FOREST HISTORICAL CENTER — $40,000 · OtherLAKE FOREST HISTORICAL CENTERLake Forest Historical Society — $22,500 · OtherNEWCOMB PROJECT — $19,784 · Other+7 more — $13,191 · OtherMILLENNIUM PARK FOUNDATION — $90,000 · Recreation & SportsMILLENNIUM PARK…Gorton Community Center — $40,000 · Human ServicesNATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE UNITED STATES — $20,500 · Arts & CultureTHORNWILLOW INSTITUTE LTD — $7,500 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $500 · Arts & CultureTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO — $11,500 · EducationRhodes College — $10,000 · Education
Other$480,402Recreation & Sports$90,000Human Services$40,000Arts & Culture$28,500Education$21,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetIllinois Executive Mansion Association — $181,302 over 5y, 49% of budgetTHE STICKLEY MUSEUM AT CRAFTSMAN FARMS INC — $123,625 over 9y, 6.0% of budgetMILLENNIUM PARK FOUNDATION — $90,000 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetGorton Community Center — $40,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetNATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE UNITED STATES — $20,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO — $11,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRhodes College — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHORNWILLOW INSTITUTE LTD — $7,500 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetLAKE FOREST FOUNDATION FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION — $1,800 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetHISTORIC NATCHEZ FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Illinois Executive Mansion Association
  • Who funds THE STICKLEY MUSEUM AT CRAFTSMAN FARMS INC
  • Who funds MILLENNIUM PARK FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Gorton Community Center
  • Who funds NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE UNITED STATES
  • Who funds THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO
  • Who funds Rhodes College
  • Who funds THORNWILLOW INSTITUTE LTD
  • Who funds LAKE FOREST FOUNDATION FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION
  • Who funds HISTORIC NATCHEZ FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community TrustIL12.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Crab Tree Farm Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Crab Tree Farm Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Crab Tree Farm Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph