Skip to content

· Private foundation

Cp Ward Charitable Foundation

Its FY2021 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2k
Granted FY2019
8
Grants FY2019
2
States reached
$500
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2019.

Human Services$5kAnimals$3kArts & Culture$2kCrime & Legal$1kYouth Development$1kPhilanthropy$900Recreation & Sports$670Community Improvement$450Other$0
02FY2019 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$300
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ROCHESTER ROTARY CHARITABLE TRUST$500
JESSICA COTSONAS LOVE FOR LEO$500
GREECE HISTORICAL SOCIETY$300
UNITED WAY$300
LIVONIA YOUTH WRESTLING CLUB$200
Individual grant recipient$200
WYSL U OF R RADIO$120
Individual grant recipient$75
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HILLSIDE CHILDRENS CENTER: $750 → 14%HILLSIDE CHILDRENS CENTER: $750 → 14%ROCHESTER ROTARY CHARITABLE TRUST: $1k → 14%ROCHESTER ROTARY CHARITABLE TRUST: $500 → 14%ROCHESTER ROTARY CHARITABLE TRUST: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

44%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6k · 8 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2019, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
17

Total granted

$6k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+86%

Still filing today

25%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19
Human ServicesPublic Safety & DisasterAnimalsCrime & LegalEducationArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RR
    ROCHESTER ROTARY CHARITABLE TRUSTS INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $2k · revenue +6%
  • HC
    HILLSIDE CHILDREN'S CENTER
    2× · 2017–2018 · $2k · revenue +14%
  • HF
    HEMLOCK FAIR ASSOCIATION
    2× · 2017–2018 · $1k

Funded once

  • SP
    SENECA PARK ZOO SOCIETY
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue -4%
  • CS
    CUB SCOUT PACK 4027
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • THE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF GREATER ROCHESTERgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +422%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rochester Museum & Science Center

The mission of the rochester museum and science center is to create a better world through inspiring curiosity, exploration, and engagement across history, science, culture, and the natural world.

Arts & Culture
2
Rochester General Health System

Rochester general health system, provides patient care, senior housing, laboratory services, and community outreach to residents and other clients in monroe county, new york and several surrounding counties.

Health
3
Rochester General College of Health Careers

The rochester general college of health careers is dedicated to preparing adult learners with the knowledge, skills, and competencies necessary to pursue health careers, advanced education, and lifelong learning.

Education
4
The Rochester General Hospital

To establish, erect and maintain a general hospital and dispensary in the county of monroe, ny for medical and surgical aid, care and treatment of persons in need thereof; to carry on and conduct a training school for nurses; to promote…

Health
5
The Montessori School of Rochester

To nourish the child's spirit, while fostering exploration, independence, and confidence. we strive to inspire a lifelong love of learning, while modeling grace, courtesy, and respect for self, others, and the earth.

—
6
Rochester Children's Scholarship Fund Inc

Provide scholarships for students with good scholastic standing and family financial difficulties.

Education
7
Rochester Public Library

To engage the community in life-long learning for all through equal access to information, technology, gathering spaces and expert staff.

Education
8
Rochester Rotary Club

We are a member-centered service organization enriching the lives of our city youth, people with disabilities and world neighbors.

Community Improvement
9
Cfa Society of Rochester

To deliver educational programming, and promote the chartered financial analyst designation for the benefit of finance professionals in greater rochester.

Membership Benefit
10
Montefiore New Rochelle Hospital

Mission: to heal, to teach, to discover and to advance the health of the communities we serve. values: humanity, innovation, teamwork, diversity and equity - our values define our philosophy of care. they shape our actions and motivate and…

Health
11
The Joseph E Peter Foundation
Philanthropy
12
Genesee Country Museum

Through immersive experiences, we enrich life today by connecting people with history, art, and nature.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hillside Children's Center; the most unlike its peers is East Avon Fire Department Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CUB SCOUT PACK 4027: $1,000 · OtherCUB SCOUT PACK 4027HEMLOCK FAIR ASSOCIATION: $1,000 · OtherHEMLOCK FAIR ASSOCIATIONUNITED WAY: $900 · OtherUNITED WAYAL SIGL CENTER: $500 · OtherAL SIGL CENTERJESSICA COTSONAS LOVE FOR LEO: $500 · OtherJESSICA COTSONAS LOVE FOR LEOLIVONIA YOUTH WRESTLING CLUB: $450 · OtherLIVONIA YOUTH WRESTLING CLUBIndividual grant recipient: $350 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWHEATLAND CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $250 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $225 · Other+11 more: $1,320 · Other+11 moreROCHESTER ROTARY CHARITABLE TRUSTS INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesROCHESTER ROTARY CHARITABLE…HILLSIDE CHILDREN'S CENTER: $1,500 · Human ServicesHILLSIDE CHILDREN'S CENTERSENECA PARK ZOO SOCIETY: $3,000 · AnimalsSENECA PARK ZOO SOCIETYTHE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF GREATER ROCHESTER: $1,000 · Crime & LegalGreece Historical Society: $300 · Arts & CultureMONTOUR FALLS FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $250 · Public Safety & DisasterEAST AVON FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $50 · Public Safety & DisasterUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $80 · Education
Other$6,495Human Services$3,500Animals$3,000Crime & Legal$1,000Arts & Culture$300Public Safety & Disaster$300Education$80

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSENECA PARK ZOO SOCIETY: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetROCHESTER ROTARY CHARITABLE TRUSTS INC: $2,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHILLSIDE CHILDREN'S CENTER: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF GREATER ROCHESTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMONTOUR FALLS FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $250 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetOPERATION HOPE INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $80 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEAST AVON FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $50 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SENECA PARK ZOO SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds ROCHESTER ROTARY CHARITABLE TRUSTS INC ↗
  • Who funds HILLSIDE CHILDREN'S CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF GREATER ROCHESTER ↗
  • Who funds Greece Historical Society ↗
  • Who funds MONTOUR FALLS FIRE DEPARTMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER ↗
  • Who funds EAST AVON FIRE DEPARTMENT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Max and Marian Farash Charitable FoundationNY13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Max and Marian Farash Charitable Foundation · United Way of Greater Rochester and the Finger Lakes Inc · Rochester Area Community Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cp Ward Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cp Ward Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Cp Ward Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Cp Ward Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2021) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2019, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Cp Ward’s filings →

    More from the funding graph