· Private foundation
Cox Charitable Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MISSIONS TO NORTH AMERICA | $9,300 |
| HAMACHER PROSTATE CANCER RESEARCH FUNDWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MED | $7,000 |
| BIBLE PROJECT | $3,100 |
| PROVIDENCE CHRISTIAN CHURCH | $3,100 |
| GRACE TO YOU | $3,100 |
| EDWARDSVILLE HIGH SCHOOL SWIMMING & DIVING BOOSTER CLUB | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| METRO EAST HUMANE SOCIETY | $300 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–22, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 52% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
9 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MTMISSIONS TO NORTH AMERICA2× · 2024–2025 · $18k
- HPHAMACHER PROSTATE CANCER RESEARCH FUNDWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MED2× · 2024–2025 · $14k
- GTGRACE TO YOU4× · 2020–2025 · $12k
Funded once
- ACAtchison County Memorial Building Foundationone grant, 2021 · $21k · revenue -11% · 44% of their budget
- HPHAMACHER PROSTATE CANCER RESEARCH FUND WASHINGTON UNIV SCHOOL OF MEDICINEone grant, 2023 · $8k
- CECHRISTIANITY EXPLORED USAgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $6k · revenue +52%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
go.build.love. exists to provide individuals in underdeveloped countries with clean water while sharing the love and message of Jesus Christ.
Grace evangelistic ministries, inc. conducts crusades and conferences in various countries to evangelize the lost and present them with an accurate interpretation of the gospel. for those who decide to believe, we help them form bible…
Gospel Fund helps fuel healthy churches in hard places around the world.
Equip Gods people for works of service
To help spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ by providing resources and financial support to projects throughout Asia
CEF is a Bible-centered worldwide organization composed of born-again believers whose purpose is to evangelize boys and girls with the gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ and to establish (disciple) them in the Word of God and in a local…
The Filter Project is a parachurch ministry whose mission is to pour Gods love into under-resourced communities through the gift of safe, filtered, drinking water in Kenya and plan to serve into additional countries in the future.
With god's help, to reach spanish-speaking people throughout the world with the good news of salvation through the lord jesus christ and to disciple them for christian ministry.
To spread the Gospel of Jesus the Christ
Ministry coaching and training--provided coaching and training in ministry, mission, and evangelism for churches,church leaders and christian non-profits christian video production--filmed and produced christian bible series for use by…
To provide an ongoing, sustainable revenue source to the most vulnerable demographic in Uganda, while sharing the gospel and eternal hope found in Jesus Christ.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Christianity Explored Usa and the most unlike its peers is Carelink Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Atchison County Memorial Building Foundation ↗
- Who funds BIBLEPROJECT ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIANITY EXPLORED USA ↗
- Who funds THE GLEN-ED PANTRY ↗
- Who funds CARELINK FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds IF NOT FOR GRACE MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds BOYS GROW CORP ↗
- Who funds VOLUNTEER FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds METRO EAST HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Cox Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Volunteer Florida Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.