Skip to content

· Public charity

Covering Kids & Families of Indiana Inc

The mission of ckf-in: facilitates and advocates accessible health for all hoosiers with a primary focus on healthcare coverage and children's development.

$2.7M
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$841k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Community Improvement$6.6MHealth$5.9MHuman Services$5.7MPhilanthropy$1.6MEmployment$1.3MEducation$1.1MCrime & Legal$500kHousing & Shelter$353k
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $161k
  • $50k–250k11 grants · $1.4M
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.1M
$113,435
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BRIGHTPOINT$841,143
DUNEBROOK INC$268,004
UNITED HEALTH SERVICES$217,772
SCOTT COUNTY PARTNERSHIP$172,772
HOMELESS COALITION OF SOUTHERN IN$159,031
SOUTH EASTERN INDIANA ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY CORPORATION$139,038
HEART OF INDIANA UNITED WAY$128,219
HEALTHY COMMUNITIES OF CLINTON COUNTY$123,545
OPEN DOOR HEALTH SERVICES$113,435
SOUTH CENTRAL COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM$109,941
UNITED WAY OF BARTHOLOMEW COUNTY$97,390
COMMUNITY ACTION OF WESTERN IN$89,666
AREA FIVE AGENCY ON AGING$61,856
LINCOLN HILLS DEVELOPMENT CORP$47,183
CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES$42,400
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $3.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%AREA FIVE AGENCY ON AGING: $129k → 13%INTERLOCAL COMMUNITY ACTION PROG: $161k → 14%PACE COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC: $194k → 15%LINCOLN HILLS DEVELOPMENT CORP: $243k → 17%COMMUNITY ACTION OF WESTERN IN: $91k → 18%AREA FIVE AGENCY ON AGING: $118k → 13%INTERLOCAL COMMUNITY ACTION PROG: $148k → 14%PACE COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC: $191k → 15%LINCOLN HILLS DEVELOPMENT CORP: $238k → 17%COMMUNITY ACTION OF WESTERN IN: $90k → 18%AREA FIVE AGENCY ON AGING: $94k → 13%INTERLOCAL COMMUNITY ACTION PROG: $47k → 14%PACE COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC: $88k → 15%LINCOLN HILLS DEVELOPMENT CORP: $121k → 17%COMMUNITY ACTION OF WESTERN IN: $88k → 18%AREA FIVE AGENCY ON AGING: $94k → 13%PACE COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC: $87k → 15%LINCOLN HILLS DEVELOPMENT CORP: $110k → 17%COMMUNITY ACTION OF WESTERN IN: $81k → 18%AREA FIVE AGENCY ON AGING: $92k → 13%CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES: $42k → 15%LINCOLN HILLS DEVELOPMENT CORP: $92k → 17%COMMUNITY ACTION OF WESTERN IN: $79k → 18%AREA FIVE AGENCY ON AGING: $84k → 13%CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES: $17k → 15%LINCOLN HILLS DEVELOPMENT CORP: $92k → 17%COMMUNITY ACTION OF WESTERN IN: $73k → 18%AREA FIVE AGENCY ON AGING: $66k → 13%CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES: $13k → 15%LINCOLN HILLS DEVELOPMENT CORP: $89k → 17%COMMUNITY ACTION OF WESTERN IN: $49k → 18%AREA FIVE AGENCY ON AGING: $62k → 13%LINCOLN HILLS DEVELOPMENT CORP: $79k → 17%AREA FIVE AGENCY ON AGING: $57k → 13%LINCOLN HILLS DEVELOPMENT CORP: $47k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$23M · 24 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

24 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
0

Total granted

$23M
$0

Still filing today

96%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthCommunity ImprovementEducationPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    COMMUNITY ACTION OF NORTHEAST INDIANA INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $6.3M · revenue +72%
  • SC
    SCOTT COUNTY PARTNERSHIP INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.3M · revenue +56%
  • OD
    Open Door Health Services Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +76%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Community Action of East Central Indiana

    To provide education and assistance to low income, disadvantaged individuals and children.

    Human Services
    2
    Northwest Indiana Community Action Corporation

    CoAction envisions the people of Northwest Indiana flourishing regardless of income, ability or age. Thus, people experiencing financial hardship find opportunities, resources and respect at CoAction.

    Community Improvement
    3
    Indiana County Community Action Program

    Provide resources for low income clients.

    Human Services
    4
    Southern Indiana Community Health Care

    To provide high-quality, comprehensive, community-sensitive health care utilizing christ-oriented principles. rooted in our faith-driven values, sichc serves as a pillar for accessible, comprehensive care of the whole person and a catalyst…

    Health
    5
    Community Action Partnership of Lake County

    Community action partnership of lake county operates as a nonprofit organization located in waukegan, illinois servicing disadvantaged families by providing comprehensive health, education, nutritional and social services to preschool aged…

    Education
    6
    Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

    Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

    Community Improvement
    7
    Community Action Board

    To partner with the community to eliminate poverty and create social change through advocacy and essential services.

    Employment
    8
    Union Health System

    To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

    Health
    9
    West Central Community Action

    In partnership with state and federal government, our mission is to administer programs designed to help residents in our 10-county region of southwest iowa achieve self-sufficiency.

    Human Services
    10
    United Way of Clinton County Iowa

    To provide leadership in our communities to 1) identify our most pressing human care needs, 2) to work together to direct the time, energy and resources towards addressing those needs to improve our quality of life.

    —
    11
    Independent Insurance Agents of Indiana

    To enhance the competitive position and fulfill business requirements of independent agents and brokers, advocating buyer interest, and continually striving to be the premier trade association.

    —
    12
    Hancock-Hardin-Wyandot-Putnam Community Action Commission

    To reduce the conditions of poverty by providing comprehensive services to improve lives.to accomplish the mission, hhwp cac will collect and analyze data on the nature of poverty and the existing resources in the area. hhwp cac will…

    —
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Interlocal Community Action Program Inc; the most unlike its peers is United Health Services of St Joseph County. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    2
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    6
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    23/24
    Grantees still filing
    16/24
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    COMMUNITY ACTION OF NORTHEAST INDIANA INC: $6,309,274 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY ACTION OF NORTHEAST INDIANA I…SCOTT COUNTY PARTNERSHIP INC: $1,335,359 · Community ImprovementSCOTT COUNTY PARTNERSHIP INCWEST CENTRAL INDIANA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT INC: $308,306 · Community ImprovementUNITED HEALTH SERVICES OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY: $1,946,712 · OtherUNITED HEALTH SERVICES OF ST…HEALTHY COMMUNITIES OF LAPORTE COUNTY INC: $959,627 · OtherHEALTHY COMMUNITIES OF LAPOR…DUBOIS-PIKE-WARRICK EOC INC D/B/A TRI-CAP: $862,107 · OtherDUBOIS-PIKE-WARRICK EOC INC …United Way of Madison County Indiana Inc: $779,276 · OtherUnited Way of Madison County…COMMUNITY ACTION OF SOUTHERN INDIANA: $741,308 · OtherCOMMUNITY ACTION OF SOUTHERN…DUNEBROOK INC: $500,179 · OtherDUNEBROOK INCLINCOLN HILLS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $1,111,882 · Human ServicesLINCOLN HILLS DE…AREA FIVE AGENCY ON AGING & COMMUNITY SERVICES: $794,973 · Human ServicesAREA FIVE AGENCY…PACE COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC: $560,410 · Human ServicesPACE COMMUNITY A…Community Action Program Inc of Western Indiana: $551,428 · Human ServicesCommunity Action…INTERLOCAL COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM INC: $356,481 · Human ServicesINTERLOCAL COMMU…+1 more: $72,745 · Human ServicesOpen Door Health Services Inc: $1,149,838 · HealthOpen Door Heal…HEALTHY COMMUNITIES OF CLINTON COUN: $1,114,148 · HealthHEALTHY COMMUN…COMMUNITY HEALTHNET INC: $515,461 · HealthCOMMUNITY HEAL…TULIP TREE HEALTH SERVICES OF GIBSO: $199,571 · HealthTULIP TREE HEA…SOUTHEASTERN INDIANA ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY CORPORATION: $1,072,444 · EducationSOUTH CENTRAL COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM INC: $609,617 · EducationTHE JACKSON COUNTY UNITED WAY INC: $645,056 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF BARTHOLOMEW COUNTY INC: $175,019 · PhilanthropyHOMELESS COALITION OF SOUTHERN INDIANA INC: $353,233 · Housing & Shelter
    Community Improvement$7,952,939Other$5,789,209Human Services$3,447,919Health$2,979,018Education$1,682,061Philanthropy$820,075Housing & Shelter$353,233

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION OF NORTHEAST INDIANA INC: $6,309,274 over 9y, 3.1% of budgetUNITED HEALTH SERVICES OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY: $1,946,712 over 9y, 23% of budgetSCOTT COUNTY PARTNERSHIP INC: $1,335,359 over 9y, 17% of budgetOpen Door Health Services Inc: $1,149,838 over 9y, 1.2% of budgetHEALTHY COMMUNITIES OF CLINTON COUN: $1,114,148 over 9y, 34% of budgetLINCOLN HILLS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $1,111,882 over 9y, 2.1% of budgetSOUTHEASTERN INDIANA ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY CORPORATION: $1,072,444 over 9y, 2.3% of budgetHEALTHY COMMUNITIES OF LAPORTE COUNTY INC: $959,627 over 8y, 57% of budgetDUBOIS-PIKE-WARRICK EOC INC D/B/A TRI-CAP: $862,107 over 4y, 6.7% of budgetAREA FIVE AGENCY ON AGING & COMMUNITY SERVICES: $794,973 over 9y, 1.8% of budgetUnited Way of Madison County Indiana Inc: $779,276 over 9y, 15% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION OF SOUTHERN INDIANA: $741,308 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetTHE JACKSON COUNTY UNITED WAY INC: $645,056 over 6y, 19% of budgetSOUTH CENTRAL COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM INC: $609,617 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetPACE COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC: $560,410 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetCommunity Action Program Inc of Western Indiana: $551,428 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTHNET INC: $515,461 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetDUNEBROOK INC: $500,179 over 2y, 7.9% of budgetINTERLOCAL COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM INC: $356,481 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetHOMELESS COALITION OF SOUTHERN INDIANA INC: $353,233 over 4y, 16% of budgetWEST CENTRAL INDIANA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT INC: $308,306 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetTULIP TREE HEALTH SERVICES OF GIBSO: $199,571 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetUNITED WAY OF BARTHOLOMEW COUNTY INC: $175,019 over 2y, 6.7% of budgetChildren and Family Services Inc: $72,745 over 3y, 0.7% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION OF NORTHEAST INDIANA INC ↗
    • Who funds UNITED HEALTH SERVICES OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY ↗
    • Who funds SCOTT COUNTY PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
    • Who funds Open Door Health Services Inc ↗
    • Who funds HEALTHY COMMUNITIES OF CLINTON COUN ↗
    • Who funds LINCOLN HILLS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
    • Who funds SOUTHEASTERN INDIANA ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY CORPORATION ↗
    • Who funds HEALTHY COMMUNITIES OF LAPORTE COUNTY INC ↗
    • Who funds DUBOIS-PIKE-WARRICK EOC INC D/B/A TRI-CAP ↗
    • Who funds AREA FIVE AGENCY ON AGING & COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
    • Who funds United Way of Madison County Indiana Inc ↗
    • Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION OF SOUTHERN INDIANA ↗
    • Who funds THE JACKSON COUNTY UNITED WAY INC ↗
    • Who funds SOUTH CENTRAL COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM INC ↗
    • Who funds PACE COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC ↗
    • Who funds Community Action Program Inc of Western Indiana ↗
    • Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTHNET INC ↗
    • Who funds DUNEBROOK INC ↗
    • Who funds INTERLOCAL COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM INC ↗
    • Who funds HOMELESS COALITION OF SOUTHERN INDIANA INC ↗
    • Who funds WEST CENTRAL INDIANA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT INC ↗
    • Who funds TULIP TREE HEALTH SERVICES OF GIBSO ↗
    • Who funds UNITED WAY OF BARTHOLOMEW COUNTY INC ↗
    • Who funds Children and Family Services Inc ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Early Learning Indiana IncIN20.8× affinity8 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Early Learning Indiana Inc · Community Foundation Alliance Inc · Indiana Family Health Council Inc · First Financial Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Covering Kids & Families of Indiana Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Covering Kids & Families of Indiana Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Covering Kids & Families of Indiana’s filings →

      More from the funding graph