Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Council on Social Work Education

Cswe's mission is "to advance excellence and innovation in social work education, by providing leadership and scholarship, to ensure quality in teaching and learning, supporting critical thinking, empathy, and advocacy to strengthen the capacity of our membership".

$1.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Education$977kMembership Benefit$84kPhilanthropy$68kScience & Tech$26kRecreation & Sports$6k
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 9 grants below total $102,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,131,350 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,029,350 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $95k
$11,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$9.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BRIDGEWATER STATE UNIVERSITY$18,000
ST EDWARD'S UNIVERSITY$11,000
CLARK ATLANTA UNIVERSITY$11,000
SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT STATE UNIVERSITY$11,000
ST CATHERINE UNIVERSITY$11,000
RAMAPO COLLEGE FOUNDATION$11,000
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS - ARLINGTON$11,000
UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA-ANCHORAGE$11,000
NC STATE UNIVERSITY$7,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 82% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY: $24k → 11%BRIDGEWATER STATE UNIVERSITY: $18k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF ST THOMAS: $24k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN: $24k → 10%UNIVERISTY OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $24k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA: $24k → 13%MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $24k → 16%SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT STATE UNIVERSITY: $11k → 12%CLARK ATLANTA UNIVERSITY: $11k → 13%METROPOLITAN ST UNIV OF DENV: $16k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA-ANCHORAGE: $11k → 10%BD OF TRUSTEES OF ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY: $24k → 19%RAMAPO COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $11k → 7%SOUTHERN UNIV OF NEW ORLEANS: $24k → 23%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND-BALTIMORE: $24k → 19%ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY: $16k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF ST THOMAS: $16k → 14%UNIV OF TEXAS AUSTIN: $16k → 10%UNIVERISTY OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $16k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA: $16k → 13%MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $16k → 16%METROPOLITAN ST UNIVERSITY OF DENVER: $12k → 12%BD OF TRUSTEES OF ILL ST UNIV: $16k → 19%SOUTHERN UNIV OF NEW ORLEANS: $16k → 23%UNIV OF MARYLAND-BALTIMORE: $16k → 19%ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY: $16k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF ST THOMAS: $16k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF TX AUSTIN: $16k → 10%UNIVERISTY OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $16k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA: $16k → 13%MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $16k → 16%BD OF TRUSTEES OF ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY: $16k → 19%SOUTHERN UNIV OF NEW ORLEAN: $16k → 23%ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY: $16k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF ST THOMAS: $16k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN: $16k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $16k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA: $12k → 13%MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $12k → 16%BD OF TRUSTEES OF ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY: $16k → 19%SOUTHERN UNIV OF N ORLEANS: $16k → 23%ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY: $12k → 11%ST CATHERINE UNIVERSITY: $12k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF TX AUSTIN: $12k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $12k → 16%UNIV OF CENTRAL FLORIDA RESEARCH FDN: $16k → 13%BD OF TRUSTEES OF ILL ST UNIVERSITY: $12k → 19%SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY OF NEW ORLEAN: $12k → 23%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
IA
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
MO
MD
AZ
AR
NC
SC
DC
LA
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$910k · 15 repeat orgs$241k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +125% since the first grant, against +37% for the ones you funded once.

15 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
22

Total granted

$910k
$205k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+125%
+37%

Still filing today

73%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $36k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’23’24
EducationPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    University of St Thomas
    5× · 2017–2021 · $152k · revenue +49%
  • SU
    SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY AT NEW ORLEANS FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $84k · revenue +142% · 39% of their budget
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $84k · revenue +148%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $16k · revenue +60%
  • PS
    Philander Smith College
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue -5%
  • TA
    THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUNDgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +44%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
2
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
3
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
4
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
5
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
6
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
7
Roger Williams University

At Roger Williams University, students are prepared to be thinkers and doers ready to solve challenging problems with innovative solutions. RWU offers robust offerings of undergraduate, graduate and professional programs across eight…

Education
8
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
9
The Catholic University of America

As the national university of the catholic church in the united states, founded and sponsored by the bishops of the country with the approval of the holy see, the catholic university of america is committed to being a comprehensive…

Education
10
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
11
Delaware State University

Delaware state university is a public, comprehensive, 1890 land-grant institution that offers access and opportunity to diverse populations from delaware, the nation, and the world. (continued on schedule o.)building on its heritage as a…

Education
12
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of St Thomas and the most unlike its peers is Philander Smith College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 61 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%7%5–10yr19%7%10–20yr16%4%20–35yr13%26%35–55yr16%56%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%2%5–10yr19%11%10–20yr16%2%20–35yr13%29%35–55yr16%56%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/41
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,524

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/28
Grantees still filing
23/28
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

University of St Thomas — $152,000 · EducationUniversity of St ThomasSOUTHERN UNIVERSITY AT NEW ORLEANS FOUNDATION INC — $84,000 · EducationSOUTHERN UNIVERSITY AT NEW ORLEANS FOUNDATION INCMETROPOLITAN STATE UNIVERSITY OF DENVER FOUNDATION INC — $84,000 · EducationMETROPOLITAN STATE UNIVERSITY OF DENVER FOUNDATION INCUniversity of South Carolina Educational Foundation — $84,000 · EducationUniversity of South Carolina Educational FoundationARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY — $84,000 · EducationARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY+21 more — $244,168 · Education+21 moreUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS — $84,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXASUNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS COMMUNITY CREDIT UNION — $84,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS COMMUNITY …MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY — $68,000 · OtherMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF ALASKA — $17,000 · OtherUNIV OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON — $17,000 · Other+9 more — $74,478 · Other+9 moreUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $84,000 · Philanthropy
Education$732,168Other$344,478Philanthropy$84,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUniversity of St Thomas — $152,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN UNIVERSITY AT NEW ORLEANS FOUNDATION INC — $84,000 over 5y, 39% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $84,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetMETROPOLITAN STATE UNIVERSITY OF DENVER FOUNDATION INC — $84,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetUniversity of South Carolina Educational Foundation — $84,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY — $84,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS COMMUNITY CREDIT UNION — $84,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBridgewater State University Foundation — $18,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetST CATHERINE UNIVERSITY — $17,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRAMAPO COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $17,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetClark Atlanta University Inc — $17,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSt Edwards University — $17,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE FOUNDATION INC — $16,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN CONNECTICUT STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $11,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPhilander Smith College — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRYN MAWR COLLEGE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetResearch Foundation of the City University of New York — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTER AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICO — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $9,975 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HOWARD UNIVERSITY — $9,923 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York — $9,585 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PORTLAND — $9,222 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education — $9,168 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAYETTEVILLE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $9,145 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetEvangel University — $8,150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetClarke University of Dubuque Iowa — $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Collegiate A…Folds of Honor Founda…Tulsa Community Found…Charities Aid Foundat…The Blackbaud Giving …Morgan Stanley Global…American Online Givin…The Bank of America C…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
National Collegiate Athletic AssociationIN13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Collegiate Athletic Association · Folds of Honor Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Council on Social Work Education funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Bridgewater State University Foundation — 27% of income from government
  • University of Central Florida Research Foundation Inc — 7% of income from government
  • University of Portland — 2% of income from government
  • Ramapo College Foundation — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $1.3M of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines