Skip to content

California · Private foundation

Cottonwood Spring

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$700k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
25
Grants FY2025
22
Organizations funded FY2024
5%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$30,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$35,000
Organizations funded a year
8 to 22
FY2022 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
6
Total assets, FY2025
$9.7M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 5% of the organizations Cottonwood Spring funded were first-time grantees, receiving 4% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24
EnvironmentArts & CultureEmploymentPhilanthropyAnimalsInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving25$700k16%
FY202422$650k5%
FY202321$520k62%
FY20228$200kn/a
96% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Environment$525kAnimals$295kHousing & Shelter$235kArts & Culture$195kCommunity Improvement$190kCivil Rights$165kPublic Benefit$105kEducation$105kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2022 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 23 grantees

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 3 recipients with no EIN on record ($185k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Cottonwood Spring supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSanta Cruz Hub for Sustainable Living: $130,000 over 4y, 7.0% of budgetHousing Matters: $125,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCommittee to Protect Journalists Inc: $125,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetAnimal Legal Defense Fund Inc: $120,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetInstitute on Taxation and Economic Policy: $105,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetCommunity Action Board: $100,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetUnited Way of Santa Cruz County: $100,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetPolicylink: $90,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetThe Humane League: $90,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLand Trust of Santa Cruz County: $85,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetAnimal Outlook Inc: $85,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetInstitute for Policy Studies: $85,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetWikimedia Foundation Inc: $85,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmah Mutsun Land Trust: $85,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetNew Way Homes Inc: $80,000 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetGlobal Press Institute: $75,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetBuilding Decarbonization Coalition: $70,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCenter for Carbon Removal: $70,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetNational Trust for Local News: $70,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGlobal Investigative Journalism Network Inc: $50,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetAmerican Civil Liberties Union Foundation Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWilliam J Brennan Center for Justice Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 22.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation Santa Cruz CountyCA17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation Santa Cruz County · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Tides Foundation · Sutter Bay Hospitals · Sunlight Giving · Dignity Health · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · East Bay Community Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Cottonwood Spring with peer funders

About Cottonwood Spring

How much does Cottonwood Spring give?
Cottonwood Spring reported 25 grants totaling $700,000 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 8 and 22 organizations a year over FY2022 to FY2024.
What does Cottonwood Spring fund?
By grant dollars over FY2022 to FY2025, its largest causes are Environment (25%), Animals (14%), Housing & Shelter (11%).
Who are Cottonwood Spring's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2022 to FY2025: Santa Cruz Hub for Sustainable Living ($130k), Housing Matters ($125k), Committee to Protect Journalists Inc ($125k).
Does Cottonwood Spring fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 5% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Cottonwood Spring accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Cottonwood Spring?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Community Foundation Santa Cruz County, Silicon Valley Community Foundation, Tides Foundation.
Where is Cottonwood Spring based?
Cottonwood Spring is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Cottonwood Spring’s filings →

More from the funding graph