Skip to content

· Private foundation

Cost of Discipleship Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$350k
Granted FY2024still arriving
27
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$124k
Largest
01What it funds
0184% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Religion$438kCommunity Improvement$301kEducation$63kYouth Development$39kHealth$35kHousing & Shelter$26kPublic Safety & Disaster$3kHuman Services$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k21 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $69k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $245k
$1,400
Median grant
5
States reached
$383k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ABIDE NETWORK$124,000
LOVE CHURCH$121,234
VICTORY BOXING CLUB$24,000
CHRISTIAN BUSINESS MEN (CMBC)$19,885
ST LUKE'S CANCER INSTITUTE$15,096
PARTNERSHIP 4 KIDS$10,000
OMAHA STREET SCHOOL$5,678
NEW MEXICO HIGHLANDS UNIVERSITY$5,000
PILLAR SEMINARY$5,000
OPEN DOOR MISSION$4,250
BARNIENTOS SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION$2,500
REVIVE MINISTRIES$2,000
VARIOUS ORGANZATIONS UNDER 500$1,666
YOUTH FOR CHRIST$1,400
Individual grant recipient$1,100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%YMCA OF GREATER OMAHA: $250 → 6%OMAHA HOME FOR BOYS: $500 → 12%OMAHA HOME FOR BOYS: $400 → 12%YMCA OF GREATER OMAHA: $617 → 12%LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES: $500 → 12%OPEN DOOR MISSION: $4k → 12%OPEN DOOR MISSION: $4k → 12%OPEN DOOR MISSION: $3k → 12%OPEN DOOR MISSION: $3k → 12%OPEN DOOR MISSION: $1k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
NY
MA
SD
IN
PA
CO
NE
VA
NM
TN
OK
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$861k · 24 repeat orgs$62k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +11% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
44

Total granted

$861k
$45k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
0%

Still filing today

54%
16%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VB
    Victory Boxing Club
    4× · 2020–2024 · $37k · revenue +11%
  • PS
    Pillar Seminary
    4× · 2021–2024 · $25k · revenue +3%
  • P4
    Partnership 4 Kids Inc
    4× · 2021–2024 · $15k · revenue +68%

Funded once

  • MC
    MISSION CHURCH
    one grant, 2022 · $11k
  • MH
    MISSION HOPE CHURCH MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2020 · $7k
  • RI
    RELEASE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $6k · revenue -21%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
One Omaha

One omaha empowers people where they live with education, training, and engagement to develop thriving neighborhoods.

Community Improvement
2
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
3
Methodist Fremont Health

The mission of methodist fremont health is to improve the quality of life by caring for the body and mind. methodist fremont health supports its mission of caring for people through the provision of inpatient and outpatient hospital…

Health
4
Omaha Community Foundation

To serve the community by cultivating generosity and strengthening nonprofits.

Philanthropy
5
Nebraska Methodist Hospital

Nebraska methodist hospital (commonly know as "methodist hospital") is an acute care facility dedicated to bringing high quality care for the mind, body and spirit of every person. we provide community-based health care, health education…

Health
6
Unmc Physicians

Our mission is to lead the world in transforming lives to create a healthy future for all individuals and communities through premier educational programs, innovative research and extraordinary patient care.

Health
7
Nebraska Organ Recovery System

We transform lives through organ and tissue donation.

Health
8
Omaha Church Center Inc

None

—
9
Share Omaha

Our mission is to help nonprofits fulfill theirs.

Philanthropy
10
Great Plains Food Bank

End hunger together.

Food & Nutrition
11
Omaha Sports Commission

The mission of the omaha sports commission is to foster a positive socio-economic impact on and a heightened awareness and image of omaha by attracting, hosting, & supporting amateur sporting events.

Recreation & Sports
12
Nebraska Medicine

Our mission is to lead the world in transforming lives to create a healthy future for individuals and committees through premier educational programs, innovative research and extraordinary patient care.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Omaha Youth for Christ; the most unlike its peers is The Nebraska Medical Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 81 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
16/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ABIDE NETWORK INC: $299,500 · OtherABIDE NETWORK INCLOVE CHURCH INC: $289,734 · OtherLOVE CHURCH INCCHRISTIAN BUSINESS MEN (CMBC): $51,405 · OtherCHRISTIAN BUSINESS MEN (CMBC)CHRISTIAN BUSINESSMEN'S MINISTRIES: $38,145 · Other+58 more: $97,231 · Other+58 moreOMAHA STREET SCHOOL: $27,680 · EducationPillar Seminary: $25,024 · EducationNEW MEXICO HIGHLANDS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · Education+1 more: $1,000 · EducationVictory Boxing Club: $36,643 · Recreation & SportsPartnership 4 Kids Inc: $14,508 · Youth DevelopmentOMAHA YOUTH FOR CHRIST: $1,400 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG LIFE: $750 · Youth DevelopmentOPEN DOOR MISSION D/B/A OPEN DOOR MISSION & LYDIA HOUSE: $14,158 · Human ServicesTHE OMAHA HOME FOR BOYS: $900 · Human ServicesYMCA OF GREATER OMAHA: $867 · Human Services+1 more: $500 · Human ServicesSIENA FRANCIS HOUSE: $9,700 · Housing & ShelterSTEPHEN CENTER INC: $1,000 · Housing & ShelterSt Luke's Health Foundation Ltd: $5,800 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $650 · HealthHARBOR HOUSE: $500 · Health+2 more: $272 · Health
Other$776,015Education$58,704Recreation & Sports$36,643Youth Development$16,658Human Services$16,425Housing & Shelter$10,700Health$7,222

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetABIDE NETWORK INC: $299,500 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetVictory Boxing Club: $36,643 over 4y, 13% of budgetOMAHA STREET SCHOOL: $27,680 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetPillar Seminary: $25,024 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetPartnership 4 Kids Inc: $14,508 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetOPEN DOOR MISSION D/B/A OPEN DOOR MISSION & LYDIA HOUSE: $14,158 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSIENA FRANCIS HOUSE: $9,700 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRELEASE INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSt Luke's Health Foundation Ltd: $5,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEW MEXICO HIGHLANDS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFIRST RESPONDERS FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOMAHA YOUTH FOR CHRIST: $1,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN CENTER INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE OMAHA HOME FOR BOYS: $900 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYMCA OF GREATER OMAHA: $867 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $650 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHARBOR HOUSE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEvery Man A Warrior Inc: $240 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $146 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Nebraska Medical Center: $126 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNebraska Sheriffs Association: $35 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ABIDE NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds Victory Boxing Club ↗
  • Who funds OMAHA STREET SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Pillar Seminary ↗
  • Who funds Partnership 4 Kids Inc ↗
  • Who funds OPEN DOOR MISSION D/B/A OPEN DOOR MISSION & LYDIA HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds SIENA FRANCIS HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds RELEASE INC ↗
  • Who funds St Luke's Health Foundation Ltd ↗
  • Who funds NEW MEXICO HIGHLANDS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FIRST RESPONDERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OMAHA YOUTH FOR CHRIST ↗
  • Who funds BARRIENTOS SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE OMAHA HOME FOR BOYS ↗
  • Who funds YMCA OF GREATER OMAHA ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Hawks FoundationNE22× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Hawks Foundation · The Charles and Mary Heider Family Foundation · The Sherwood Foundation · The Lozier Foundation · Gilbert M and Martha H Hitchcock Foundation · Mutual of Omaha Foundation · Leland J & Dorothy H Olson Charitable Foundation · Union Pacific Foundation · Adah K Millard Charitable Trust · Seline Family Foundation · Todd and Mary Heistand Family Foundation · Charles E Lakin Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cost of Discipleship Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cost of Discipleship Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Cost of Discipleship Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Cost of Discipleship Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 81 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Cost of Discipleship’s filings →

    More from the funding graph