Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Corporate Creations Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$245k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$144k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Philanthropy$1.7MEnvironment$122kHealth$61kEducation$40kScience & Tech$23kArts & Culture$21kPublic Benefit$14kInternational$13kOther$0
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$144,333
Median grant
1
States reached
$1
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CORPORATE CREATIONS GIVING INC$144,333
CORPORATE CREATIONS GIVING INC$100,285
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–23, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%PASSAIC COUNTY COURT APPOINTED SPEC: $500 → 12%HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION: $500 → 17%CHASIN A DREAM FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%PLACE OF HOPE: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WI
MI
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
KY
VA
MD
DC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.8M · 7 repeat orgs$214k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
31

Total granted

$1.8M
$214k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
+30%

Still filing today

100%
65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEnvironmentInternationalHealthScience & TechYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FA
    FRIEDREICH'S ATAXIA RESEARCH ALLIANCE
    3× · 2021–2023 · $30k · revenue +70%
  • LM
    LOGGERHEAD MARINELIFE CENTER INC
    3× · 2020–2023 · $22k · revenue +8%
  • GS
    GEORGE SNOW SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $20k · revenue +156%

Funded once

  • RS
    RISING SEAS INSTITUTE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +55% · 33% of their budget
  • WY
    WORLD YOUTH INTERNATIONAL
    one grant, 2023 · $12k
  • TR
    THE RAINFOREST ALLIANCE
    one grant, 2022 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fauna & Flora International Usa Inc

Our mission is to act to conserve threatened species and ecosystems worldwide, choosing solutions that are sustainable, based on sound science and take into account human needs.

Philanthropy
2
Oceana Inc

To advocate for policy changes by governments and corporations in order to preserve ocean life and return the oceans to their former abundance.

Environment
3
Sea Research Foundation Inc

To inspire people to care for and protect our ocean planet through education and research.

Animals
4
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

5
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
6
Florida State Parks Foundation Inc

Florida state parks foundation preserves, protects, sustains and grows florida state parks.

Recreation & Sports
7
Captains for Clean Water Inc

To advance education, awareness, and scientifically supported solutions to restore and protect marine ecosystems and our way of life for future generations.

Environment
8
Foundation for Sarcoidosis Research

The foundation for sarcoidosis research (fsr) is the leading international organization dedicated to finding a cure for sarcoidosis and improving care for sarcoidosis patients through research, education, and support. since its…

Philanthropy
9
National Marine Mammal Foundation Inc

The nmmf's mission is to improve and protect life for marine mammals, humans, and our shared oceans through science, service, and education. our vision is to be the leading laboratory in marine mammal science, where critical questions…

Animals
10
National Fish and Wildlife Foundation

To sustain, restore, and enhance the nation's fish, wildlife, plants, and habitats.

Animals
11
Marine Science Institute

The institutes mission is to cultivate a responsibility for the natural environment and our human communities through interdisciplinary science education.

12
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food for the Poor Inc and the most unlike its peers is Friedreich's Ataxia Research Alliance. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Health CentersVeteran Support ServicesAnimal Rescue and AdoptionClassical Music EnsemblesChild and Family ServicesHomeless Services & ShelterCancer Support OrganizationsChristian Missionary Organi…Affordable Housing Developm…Land Conservation Organizat…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number27%4%<5yr16%16%5–10yr20%8%10–20yr15%32%20–35yr9%28%35–55yr12%12%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value27%0%<5yr16%11%5–10yr20%7%10–20yr15%38%20–35yr9%38%35–55yr12%5%55yr+

The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/29
the rest of the field
17%
17,089/103,015

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/29
Grantees still filing
19/29
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Corporate Creations Giving Inc — $1,682,144 · OtherCorporate Creations Giving Inc+23 more — $227,108 · Other+23 moreFRIEDREICH'S ATAXIA RESEARCH ALLIANCE — $30,000 · HealthPATIENTRIGHTSADVOCATEORG INC — $10,000 · HealthLOGGERHEAD MARINELIFE CENTER INC — $22,200 · Science & TechNATIONAL MOTORISTS ASSOCIATION INC — $825 · Science & TechHEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC — $5,500 · Human ServicesCHASIN A DREAM FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesPLACE OF HOPE INC — $1,000 · Human ServicesTHE SEEING EYE INC — $1,000 · Human ServicesCHILD FOCUS INC — $500 · Human ServicesFlorida Wildlife Corridor Foundation Inc — $10,000 · EnvironmentTHE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC — $2,500 · EnvironmentWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC — $9,700 · EducationFOOD FOR THE POOR INC — $5,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $1,000 · International
Other$1,909,252Health$40,000Science & Tech$23,025Human Services$13,000Environment$12,500Education$9,700International$6,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCorporate Creations Giving Inc — $1,682,144 over 2y, 57% of budgetRISING SEAS INSTITUTE INC — $50,000 over 1y, 33% of budgetFRIEDREICH'S ATAXIA RESEARCH ALLIANCE — $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLOGGERHEAD MARINELIFE CENTER INC — $22,200 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGALAPAGOS CONSERVANCY INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLOXAHATCHEE RIVER HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetGEORGE SNOW SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPATIENTRIGHTSADVOCATEORG INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFlorida Wildlife Corridor Foundation Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC — $9,700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC — $9,700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION — $9,700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFLORIDA COUNCIL OF 100 INC — $8,457 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetHEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC — $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHASIN A DREAM FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSeal Legacy Foundation Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCALIFORNIA KILLER WHALE PROJECT INC — $5,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetFOOD FOR THE POOR INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDIGNITYMOVES — $2,101 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLACE OF HOPE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFLORIDA TAXWATCH RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Ridgefield Symphony Orchestra Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE SEEING EYE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MOTORISTS ASSOCIATION INC — $825 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHILD FOCUS INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJack The Bike Man Inc — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management IncNY11.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Corporate Creations Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 100%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • Child Focus Inc29% of income from government
  • Loxahatchee River Historical Society Inc6% of income from government
  • The Ridgefield Symphony Orchestra Inc2% of income from government
  • Jack the Bike Man Inc0% of income from government
  • Place of Hope Inc0% of income from government
  • Food for the Poor Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
10get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Corporate Creations Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Corporate Creations Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph