Loading…
· Public charity
COPPERLEAF CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC
The copperleaf charitable foundation is a tax exempt 501 (c) 3 non-profit organization that collects and distributes funds for food, education and health care, for the benefit of local charities and the copperleaf golf club's surrounding community.
$236k
Granted FY2025
11
Grants
2
Communities
$68k
Largest
01What you fund
0189% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2020–2025.
Food & Nutrition$324kHuman Services$268kPhilanthropy$183kHealth$94kHousing & Shelter$62kOther$111k
02FY2025 · 11 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k4 grants · $28k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $80k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $118k
$15,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$685k
Total assets
Largest grants
- HARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK$68,000
- HOME BASE - RED SOX & MASS GEN'L FOR VETS$50,000
- NEW HORIZONS OF SW FLORIDA$25,000
- LMHS FOUNDATION - KIDS MINDS MATTER$15,000
- ABUSE COUNSELING & TREATMENT INC$15,000
- COMMUNITY COOPERATIVE$15,000
- CAFE OF LIFE INC$10,000
- OUR MOTHER'S HOME OF SW FL$8,000
- INTERFAITH CHARITIES OF SOUTH LEE COUNTY$8,000
- SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL OLOL$6,000
- LITERACY COUNCIL GULF COAST$6,000
02The need
03
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $268k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 11%. 65% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
04
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 15% of COPPERLEAF CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 82% of the giving stays in FL; read by stated purpose it is 49% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
COPPERLEAF CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INClessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 34% directed abroad (not shown)Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.0M · 12 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else
12 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
12
1
Total granted
$1.0M
$7k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+59%
+86%
Still filing today
92%
100%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
HARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK5× · 2020–2025 · $324k · revenue +75%- HBHOME BASE - RED SOX & MASS GEN'L FOR VETS5× · 2020–2025 · $183k · revenue +21%
- NHNEW HORIZONS OF SW FLORIDA4× · 2022–2025 · $93k · revenue +63%
Funded once
- PFPARTNERS FOR BREAST CANCER CAREgraduatedone grant, 2024 · $7k · revenue +86%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
South County Food Pantry Inc
Hunger relief for the indigent. The South County Food Pantry provides food to families and individuals in the Venice, Nokomis, Laurel & Osprey, areas of FL. SCFP distributes to more than 400 family units per month.
Food & Nutrition
2
The Womens Care Florida Foundation
—
3
Southwest Florida Council Inc
The corporation shall promote, within the territory covered by the charter from time to time granted it by the boy scouts of america and in accordance with the congressional charter, bylaws, and rules and regulations of the boy scouts of…
—
4
Regional Food Bank of Northeast Florida Inc
Feeding Northeast Florida works to permanently end hunger in Northeast Florida by providing nutritious foods and other essential goods to people facing hunger, by addressing food insecurity, poverty and poor health through education and…
Food & Nutrition
5
Society of St Vincent De Paul
To operate a homeless day facility, which includes showers, laundry, hygiene items, food, mail, and a transitional work program. to provide direct assistance to the indigent in escambia and santa rosa county, florida through two area food…
Human Services
6
Volusiaflagler County Coalition for
The mission of the volusia/flagler county coalition for the homeless is to coordinate resources to assist families and individuals at risk of homelessness or currently experiencing homelessness to maintain or regain self-sufficiency.
Human Services
7
South Brevard Sharing Center Inc
South brevard sharing center's mission is to support, strengthen, and empower families (and individuals) to achieve self-sufficiency. the center operates a resource center, food pantry, and thrift store to provide temporary short-term…
Human Services
8
Hogar Crea International of Florida
Health
9
The South Florida Charity Classic
Human Services
10
Suncoast Humane Societyinc
Our mission is to encourage, honor and support the human-animal bond in the suncoastregion of florida. our vision is to celebrate a community whose pets are safe andloved. suncoast humane society provides sheltering, prevention and…
Animals
11
Home Again St Johns Inc
Coordinate providers, government, individuals, community and faith based organizations to resolve homelessness issues in St. Johns County. Providing meals in street outreach to homeless individuals.
Human Services
12
Safety Shelter of St Johns County Inc
The mission of the organization is to offer protection and quality services for victims of domestic and sexual abuse and their minor children in st. johns county, florida through the establishment and operation of a temporary shelter and…
Housing & Shelter
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Cooperative Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Red Sox Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
12 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Food & Nutrition$324,305Human Services$267,880Philanthropy$182,500Other$110,500Health$94,037Housing & Shelter$62,225
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds HOME BASE - RED SOX & MASS GEN'L FOR VETS ↗
- Who funds NEW HORIZONS OF SW FLORIDA ↗
- Who funds ABUSE COUNSELING & TREATMENT INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY COOPERATIVE ↗
- Who funds CAFE OF LIFE INC ↗
- Who funds OUR MOTHER'S HOME OF SW FL ↗
- Who funds BONITA SPRINGS ASSISSTANCE OFFICE ↗
- Who funds INTERFAITH CHARITIES OF SOUTH LEE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL OLOL ↗
- Who funds LITERACY COUNCIL GULF COAST ↗
- Who funds PARTNERS FOR BREAST CANCER CARE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
The United Way of Lee County IncFL26.8× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: The United Way of Lee County Inc · West Bay Community Charitable Foundation · Southwest Florida Community Foundation · Shadow Wood Charitable Foundation · Collier Community Foundation Inc · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Harry Chapin Food Bank of Southwest · Pelican Sound Charitable Foundation Inc · Spring Run Charitable Foundation Inc · The League Club Inc · Suncoast Credit Union Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation COPPERLEAF CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
- The Red Sox Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
- Partners for Breast Cancer Careinc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: BONITA SPRINGS ASSISSTANCE OFFICE.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~34 months of operating runway; revenue held over 8 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 592337909 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on BONITA SPRINGS ASSISSTANCE OFFICE, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 34 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue held over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 4% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Copperleaf Charitable Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Copperleaf Charitable Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines