Skip to content

· Private foundation

Coolidge Hill Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$149k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$477kCrime & Legal$132kYouth Development$108kArts & Culture$106kHuman Services$77kAnimals$60kEnvironment$46kRecreation & Sports$21k
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $128k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PEDIATRIC DEVELOPMENT CTRINC$40,000
BERKSHIRE COUNTY KIDS' PLACE AND VIOLENCE PREVENTION CENTER INC$20,000
UCP OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC$18,000
COMMUNITY ACCESS TO THE ARTS INC$15,000
GLADYS ALLEN BRIGHAM COMMUNITY CENTER$15,000
FERONIA FORWARD$10,000
ELIZABETH FREEMAN CENTER$10,000
BLUE RIDER STABLES INC$7,500
FAMILIES LIKE OURS$5,000
BERKSHIRE SOUTH REGIONAL COMMUNITY CENTER INC$5,000
CAMP WORDS UNSPOKEN$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $177k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%COMMUNITY ACCESS TO THE ARTS INC: $15k → 12%COMMUNITY ACCESS TO THE ARTS INC: $15k → 12%COMMUNITY ACCESS TO THE ARTS INC: $15k → 12%COMMUNITY ACCESS TO THE ARTS INC: $15k → 12%COMMUNITY ACCESS TO THE ARTS INC: $15k → 12%COMMUNITY ACCESS TO THE ARTS INC: $15k → 12%COMMUNITY ACCESS TO THE ARTS INC: $10k → 12%COMMUNITY ACCESS TO THE ARTS INC: $10k → 12%BLUE RIDER STABLES INC: $10k → 12%BLUE RIDER STABLES INC: $8k → 12%BLUE RIDER STABLES INC: $8k → 12%BLUE RIDER STABLES INC: $8k → 12%BLUE RIDER STABLES INC: $8k → 12%BLUE RIDER STABLES INC: $8k → 12%BLUE RIDER STABLES INC: $8k → 12%BLUE RIDER STABLES INC: $8k → 12%BLUE RIDER STABLES INC: $2k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 12 repeat orgs$49k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +108% since the first grant, against +48% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
3

Total granted

$1.1M
$41k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+108%
+48%

Still filing today

92%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesCrime & LegalRecreation & SportsEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PD
    PEDIATRIC DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $344k · revenue +13%
  • BC
    BERKSHIRE COUNTY KIDS' PLACE AND VIOLENCE PREVENTION CENTER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $152k · revenue +121%
  • GA
    GLADYS ALLEN BRIGHAM COMMUNITY CENTER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $123k · revenue +108%

Funded once

  • PD
    PEDIATRIC DEVELOPMENT CTRINC - SOUTH COUNTY
    one grant, 2017 · $16k
  • 1D
    18 DEGREES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue +48%
  • CC
    CHILD CARE OF THE BERKSHIRES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +37%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Berkshire County Head Start Child Development Program Inc

To enhance opportunities for success by inspiring each child's love of learning, partnering with families, advocating for equity, and fostering a connection to community.

Education
2
Berkshire Education and Correction Services Inc
Crime & Legal
3
Boston Community Pediatrics Inc

Boston community pediatrics (bcp) provides ambulatory pediatric and related health care services to the residents of boston, massachusetts, and surrounding communities. bcp is a new model of innovative pediatric healthcare that addresses…

Health
4
The Open Center for Children Inc

Since 1972, the open center for children has worked in partnership with families to create a nurturing early education and care experience. the play-based curriculum inspires children to become motivated, self-directed learners, feel…

—
5
Brookline Schools Staff Children's Cente

The organization's missions is to provide quality child care to children of teachers in the brookline, ma school system and others as per qualification procedures.

—
6
Edward Street Child Services Inc

Collaborates to improve the quality and impact of early education and care, enhancing the development of young children and strengthening families in central massachusetts.

Environment
7
Bristol Child Development Center Inc

Early childhood care and education.

—
8
Berkshire Country Day School

Co-educational private day school grades pre-k through 8th, encouraging academic excellence, individual promise, and responsible citizenship.

Education
9
Brockton Area Arc Inc

Brockton area arc inc will work in partnership with and for the community to provide advocacy, information and direct services that offer new opportunities and choice for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities and…

Human Services
10
Northeast Center for Youth and Families Inc

Provide a range of high-quality, community-based, behavioral health services to empower individuals and families to live healthy and successful lives.

Human Services
11
Infant Toddler Children's Center Inc

To be a learning community where children, from infants to school age, come together with experienced and responsive teachers to learn about themselves, each other, and the world.

Human Services
12
Berkshire County Arc Inc

Berkshire county arc is committed to assisting and supporting individuals in their quest to identify and realize their chosen life styles.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Berkshire County Kids' Place and Violence Prevention Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Camp Words Unspoken Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
12/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PEDIATRIC DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $344,000 · HealthPEDIATRIC DEVELOPMENT CENTER INCUCP OF WESTERN MASS INC: $110,000 · HealthUCP OF WESTERN MASS INC+1 more: $3,000 · HealthGLADYS ALLEN BRIGHAM COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $123,000 · Youth DevelopmentGLADYS ALLEN BRIG…FERONIA FORWARD LTD: $56,000 · Youth DevelopmentFERONIA FORWARD L…COMMUNITY ACCESS TO THE ARTS INC: $110,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY ACCESS …BLUE RIDER STABLES INC: $67,400 · Human ServicesBLUE RIDER STABLE…ELIZABETH FREEMAN CENTER INC: $62,000 · OtherELIZABETH FREEM…UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY ASSOC: $50,000 · OtherUNITED CEREBRAL…PEDIATRIC DEVELOPMENT CTRINC - SOUTH COUNTY: $16,000 · OtherPEDIATRIC DEVEL…18 DEGREES INC: $15,000 · Other18 DEGREES INCCHILD CARE OF THE BERKSHIRES INC: $10,000 · OtherCHILD CARE OF T…+1 more: $5,000 · OtherBERKSHIRE COUNTY KIDS' PLACE AND VIOLENCE PREVENTION CENTER INC: $152,000 · Crime & LegalBERKSHIRE COUN…BERKSHIRE SOUTH REGIONAL COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $26,000 · Recreation & SportsEXTRASPECIALTEAS INC: $15,000 · EmploymentBERKSHIRE PULSE INC: $10,800 · Arts & Culture
Health$457,000Youth Development$179,000Human Services$177,400Other$158,000Crime & Legal$152,000Recreation & Sports$26,000Employment$15,000Arts & Culture$10,800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPEDIATRIC DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $344,000 over 9y, 2.1% of budgetBERKSHIRE COUNTY KIDS' PLACE AND VIOLENCE PREVENTION CENTER INC: $152,000 over 9y, 2.3% of budgetGLADYS ALLEN BRIGHAM COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $123,000 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetUCP OF WESTERN MASS INC: $110,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACCESS TO THE ARTS INC: $110,000 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetBLUE RIDER STABLES INC: $67,400 over 9y, 2.3% of budgetELIZABETH FREEMAN CENTER INC: $62,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetFERONIA FORWARD LTD: $56,000 over 7y, 28% of budgetBERKSHIRE SOUTH REGIONAL COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $26,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budget18 DEGREES INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetEXTRASPECIALTEAS INC: $15,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetBERKSHIRE PULSE INC: $10,800 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetCHILD CARE OF THE BERKSHIRES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCAMP WORDS UNSPOKEN CORPORATION: $3,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PEDIATRIC DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds BERKSHIRE COUNTY KIDS' PLACE AND VIOLENCE PREVENTION CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds GLADYS ALLEN BRIGHAM COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds UCP OF WESTERN MASS INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ACCESS TO THE ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds BLUE RIDER STABLES INC ↗
  • Who funds ELIZABETH FREEMAN CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds FERONIA FORWARD LTD ↗
  • Who funds BERKSHIRE SOUTH REGIONAL COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds 18 DEGREES INC ↗
  • Who funds EXTRASPECIALTEAS INC ↗
  • Who funds BERKSHIRE PULSE INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILD CARE OF THE BERKSHIRES INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMP WORDS UNSPOKEN CORPORATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Berkshire Taconic Community Foundation IncMA26× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Berkshire Taconic Community Foundation Inc · Berkshire Life Charitable Foundation % Berkshire Life Insurance · Berkshire United Way Inc · Lee Bank Foundation Inc · The Feigenbaum Foundation Inc · Jane and Jack Fitzpatrick Trust · Berkshire Bank Foundation Inc · Donald C McGraw Foundation Inc · Josephine and Louise Crane Foundation · Northern Berkshire United Way Inc · Williamstown Community Chest · Gilson Family Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Coolidge Hill Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Coolidge Hill Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 59%
  • Extraspecialteas Inc: 83% of income from government
  • Ucp of Western Mass Inc: 80% of income from government
  • Elizabeth Freeman Center Inc: 76% of income from government
  • 18 Degrees Inc: 60% of income from government
  • Child Care of the Berkshires Inc: 59% of income from government
  • Gladys Allen Brigham Community Center Inc: 40% of income from government
  • Pediatric Development Center Inc: 37% of income from government
  • Community Access to the Arts Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Berkshire Pulse Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
5rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Coolidge Hill Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Coolidge Hill Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Coolidge Hill’s filings →

More from the funding graph