Skip to content
Conrad N Hilton Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Conrad N Hilton Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$288M
Granted FY2024still arriving
1,339
Grants FY2024still arriving
46
States reached
$3.5M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

International$485MEducation$178MPhilanthropy$164MHealth$136MHousing & Shelter$113MHuman Services$109MReligion$105MYouth Development$60MOther$0
02FY2024 · 1339 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k368 grants · $772k
  • $10k–50k234 grants · $4.2M
  • $50k–250k306 grants · $38M
  • $250k+431 grants · $244M
$76,000
Median grant
46
States reached
$7.4B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MARYWOOD UNIVERSITY$3,500,000
MARYWOOD UNIVERSITY$2,860,462
NORWEGIAN REFUGEE COUNCIL USA$2,600,000
AMAZON FRONTLINES$2,500,000
LUNIONE INTERNAZIONALE DELLE SUPERIORE GENERALI$2,325,000
UNIVERSIDAD DE LOS ANDES$2,300,000
Individual grant recipient$2,300,000
BRILLIANT CORNERS$2,255,000
UNITED WAY INC$2,200,000
ROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC$2,150,000
CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES$2,148,000
LTSC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION$2,142,000
SESAME WORKSHOP$2,000,000
MERCY CORPS$2,000,000
WORLD VISION$2,000,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 84% of grant dollars ($1.5B). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 16% that went abroad ($276M) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $111.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%IFOSTER INC: $1.5M → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF SAN DIEGO: $2.2M → 11%CHILDREN'S VILLAGE INC: $800k → 9%US CATHOLIC SISTERS AGAINST HUMAN TRAFFICKING: $1.0M → 11%THE TASK FORCE FOR GLOBAL HEALTH INC: $15.5M → 14%CHILD TRENDS INCORPORATED: $650k → 8%IFOSTER INC: $1.0M → 11%HOUSING CALIFORNIA: $900k → 12%SCO FAMILY OF SERVICES: $650k → 6%WATER4 INC: $1.7M → 16%HOUSING CALIFORNIA: $860k → 12%WATER4 INC: $1.6M → 16%HOUSING CALIFORNIA: $790k → 12%JEWISH CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK: $650k → 20%WATER4 INC: $1.1M → 16%HOUSING CALIFORNIA: $750k → 12%WATER4 INC: $1.0M → 16%THE CHILDRENS AID SOCIETY: $1.0M → 17%PARTNERSHIP FOR AMERICA'S CHILDREN: $900k → 14%ALEXANDRIA HOUSE: $900k → 14%GOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES: $740k → 17%YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN LOS ANGELES: $857k → 14%ZERO TO THREE NATIONAL CENTER FOR INFANTS TODDLERS AND FAMILIES: $1.9M → 14%YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN LOS ANGELES: $811k → 14%ZERO TO THREE NATIONAL CENTER FOR INFANTS TODDLERS AND FAMILIES: $1.5M → 14%FIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH: $720k → 10%FIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH: $700k → 10%FIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH: $680k → 10%THINK OF US: $1.4M → 14%THINK OF US: $850k → 14%SPECIAL SERVICE FOR GROUPS INC: $3.1M → 14%THE NEW YORK FOUNDLING: $1.1M → 17%THE NEW YORK FOUNDLING: $1.0M → 17%THE NEW YORK FOUNDLING: $800k → 17%ALLIANCE FOR EARLY SUCCESS: $4.0M → 14%THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $2.5M → 14%THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $1.1M → 14%THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $1.0M → 14%THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $725k → 14%CENTER FOR GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT: $700k → 14%EPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT: $1.2M → 17%EPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT: $1.1M → 17%EPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT: $684k → 17%PARTNERS FOR CHILDREN SOUTH LA: $750k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES: $1.0M → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES: $1.0M → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES: $1.0M → 14%UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $800k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

Beyond the US: 16% of all-years giving ($276M)

56 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Kenya$53M · 120 grants
United Kingdom$43M · 74 grants
Netherlands$23M · 23 grants
Italy$18M · 21 grants
Uganda$18M · 58 grants
Colombia$16M · 38 grants
South Africa$10M · 26 grants
Nigeria$10M · 31 grants
India$8.5M · 28 grants
Mexico$8.4M · 21 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 19% of Conrad N Hilton Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Conrad N Hilton Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 35% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5B · 1100 repeat orgs$160M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +30% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

1100 repeat relationships: 633 still active in FY2024, 467 since wound down; 228 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

1100
602

Total granted

$1.5B
$120M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+9%

Still filing today

72%
61%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40M went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationInternationalHealthPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UW
    UNITED WAY INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $51M · revenue +8% · 37% of their budget
  • MU
    Marywood University
    7× · 2018–2024 · $42M · revenue +21%
  • P
    PATH
    7× · 2018–2024 · $20M · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY
    one grant, 2020 · $8.0M · revenue +4%
  • AF
    ALLIANCE FOR EARLY SUCCESS FKA BIRTH TO FIVE POLICY ALLIANCEgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $4.0M · revenue +43% · 40% of their budget
  • RU
    REGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIA
    one grant, 2020 · $3.8M
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Forward

Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…

Public Benefit
2
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
3
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
4
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
5
Altamed Health Services Corporation

To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.

Health
6
California Dental Association Foundation

The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.

Science & Tech
7
Common Impact Inc

Common impact's mission is to strengthen the capacity of social change organizations, enabling them to better run and scale their programs. through its partnership with companies, common impact taps into the business skills and expertise…

Unclassified
8
Devworks International

Devworks international is dedicated to a society where all people enjoy the freedom to pursue their own sustainable development. we contribute to this by strengthening the capacity of local organizations.

Human Services
9
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
10
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
11
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
12
California Dental Association

The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Evidence Action; the most unlike its peers is Conrad N Hilton Memorial Park. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

1379 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1379 of the 2,000 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

125
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
241
Early backer (in before they grew)
1351/1379
Grantees still filing
894/1379
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $19,084,500 · Other+105 more: $461,854,081 · Other+105 morePATH: $20,445,000 · InternationalPATHMercy Corps: $16,854,000 · InternationalMercy CorpsMYRIAD USA INC: $14,452,000 · InternationalMYRIAD USA INCUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $13,988,250 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND F…International Rescue Committee INC: $13,846,642 · InternationalInternational Rescue…WORLD VISION INC: $13,822,385 · InternationalWORLD VISION INCNORWEGIAN REFUGEE COUNCIL USA: $9,350,000 · InternationalTHE CARTER CENTER INC: $8,855,000 · InternationalHELEN KELLER INTERNATIONAL: $8,775,000 · InternationalBRAC USA INC: $7,980,000 · International+21 more: $73,327,500 · International+21 moreMarywood University: $42,080,054 · EducationMarywood Uni…BRILLIANT CORNERS: $28,700,000 · EducationBRILLIANT CO…UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $12,855,200 · EducationUNIVERSITY O…University of Houston Foundation: $12,850,000 · EducationUniversity o…THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $8,642,300 · EducationTHE BOARD OF…SOCIAL JUSTICE PARTNERS LOS ANGELES: $5,030,000 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $4,294,400 · Education+4 more: $9,498,450 · Education+4 moreUNITED WAY INC: $51,089,304 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY …ROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC: $16,691,750 · PhilanthropyROCKEFELLER…SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GRANTMAKERS: $11,922,000 · PhilanthropySOUTHERN CA…Silicon Valley Community Foundation: $6,500,000 · PhilanthropySilicon Val…CCF COMMUNITY INITIATIVES FUND: $5,687,000 · PhilanthropyGreater Horizons: $4,653,000 · PhilanthropyFoundations and Donors Interested in Catholic Activities Inc: $4,520,000 · Philanthropy+6 more: $15,684,720 · Philanthropy+6 moreTHE TASK FORCE FOR GLOBAL HEALTH INC: $16,232,000 · Human ServicesTHE TASK F…WATER4 INC: $6,992,000 · Human ServicesWATER4 INCTHE PEOPLE CONCERN: $6,742,995 · Human ServicesTHE PEOPLE…NEW YORK FOUNDLING: $6,055,000 · Human ServicesNEW YORK F…Special Service for Groups Inc: $5,494,050 · Human ServicesCHILD TRENDS INC: $5,365,000 · Human ServicesEPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT: $4,860,000 · Human ServicesiFoster Inc: $4,280,000 · Human ServicesALLIANCE FOR EARLY SUCCESS FKA BIRTH TO FIVE POLICY ALLIANCE: $4,000,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN NOW: $3,810,000 · Human ServicesHOUSING CALIFORNIA INC: $3,800,000 · Human ServicesUNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $3,785,000 · Human Services+12 more: $34,151,600 · Human Services+12 morePublic Health Institute: $10,050,000 · HealthNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $8,000,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $7,022,675 · HealthSIGHTSAVERS INC: $5,993,000 · HealthELIZABETH GLASER PEDIATRIC AIDS FOUNDATION: $5,412,000 · HealthD-TREE INTERNATIONAL INC: $3,400,000 · HealthALZHEIMERS GREATER LOS ANGELES: $3,000,150 · HealthCOMMUNITY CATALYST INC: $2,990,000 · HealthAMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS: $2,785,000 · HealthSAFE WATER NETWORK: $9,957,000 · EnvironmentSPLASH INTERNATIONAL: $6,210,000 · EnvironmentNEW VENTURE FUND: $4,588,500 · EnvironmentRESILIENT CITIES CATALYST INC: $4,000,000 · EnvironmentNETCENTRIC CAMPAIGNS: $2,602,000 · EnvironmentAMAZON FRONTLINES: $2,525,000 · Environment
Other$480,938,581International$201,695,777Education$123,950,404Philanthropy$116,747,774Human Services$105,567,645Health$48,652,825Environment$29,882,500

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED WAY INC: $51,089,304 over 7y, 37% of budgetMarywood University: $42,080,054 over 7y, 7.1% of budgetBRILLIANT CORNERS: $28,700,000 over 7y, 6.7% of budgetPATH: $20,445,000 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetMercy Corps: $16,854,000 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC: $16,691,750 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetTHE TASK FORCE FOR GLOBAL HEALTH INC: $16,232,000 over 5y, 15% of budgetCORPORATION FOR SUPPORTIVE HOUSING: $14,595,000 over 7y, 7.8% of budgetMYRIAD USA INC: $14,452,000 over 5y, 8.1% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $13,988,250 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $13,846,642 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $13,822,385 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $12,855,200 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Houston Foundation: $12,850,000 over 4y, 69% of budgetSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GRANTMAKERS: $11,922,000 over 7y, 11% of budgetNational Center for Youth Law: $10,444,000 over 7y, 14% of budgetPublic Health Institute: $10,050,000 over 5y, 2.7% of budgetSAFE WATER NETWORK: $9,957,000 over 7y, 27% of budgetTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC: $9,570,000 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetTHE AQUAYA INSTITUTE: $9,540,000 over 7y, 54% of budgetNORWEGIAN REFUGEE COUNCIL USA: $9,350,000 over 5y, 48% of budgetMILLENNIUM WATER ALLIANCE: $9,000,000 over 6y, 54% of budgetTHE CARTER CENTER INC: $8,855,000 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetHELEN KELLER INTERNATIONAL: $8,775,000 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $8,642,300 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSESAME WORKSHOP: $8,240,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $8,000,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetBRAC USA INC: $7,980,000 over 6y, 11% of budgetLA FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATION: $7,450,000 over 5y, 6.1% of budgetTHE NATIONAL CATHOLIC REPORTER PUBLISHING CO: $7,426,000 over 7y, 32% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $7,022,675 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetWATER4 INC: $6,992,000 over 7y, 20% of budgetTHE PEOPLE CONCERN: $6,742,995 over 7y, 3.6% of budgetSilicon Valley Community Foundation: $6,500,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSPLASH INTERNATIONAL: $6,210,000 over 6y, 40% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $6,075,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetNEW YORK FOUNDLING: $6,055,000 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetSIGHTSAVERS INC: $5,993,000 over 5y, 20% of budgetJOBS FOR THE FUTURE INC: $5,930,000 over 6y, 4.6% of budgetWATERAID AMERICA INC: $5,850,000 over 5y, 15% of budgetCCF COMMUNITY INITIATIVES FUND: $5,687,000 over 5y, 18% of budgetALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN'S RIGHTS: $5,610,000 over 6y, 19% of budgetNEW YORKERS FOR CHILDREN INC: $5,603,000 over 6y, 45% of budgetCHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL USA: $5,602,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetWORLD BANK GROUP STAFF ASSOCIATION: $5,500,000 over 2y, 35% of budgetSpecial Service for Groups Inc: $5,494,050 over 7y, 2.3% of budgetELIZABETH GLASER PEDIATRIC AIDS FOUNDATION: $5,412,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetCHILD TRENDS INC: $5,365,000 over 6y, 3.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED WAY INC ↗
  • Who funds Marywood University ↗
  • Who funds BRILLIANT CORNERS ↗
  • Who funds PATH ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Corps ↗
  • Who funds ROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE TASK FORCE FOR GLOBAL HEALTH INC ↗
  • Who funds CORPORATION FOR SUPPORTIVE HOUSING ↗
  • Who funds MYRIAD USA INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds University of Houston Foundation ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GRANTMAKERS ↗
  • Who funds National Center for Youth Law ↗
  • Who funds Public Health Institute ↗
  • Who funds SAFE WATER NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AQUAYA INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds NORWEGIAN REFUGEE COUNCIL USA ↗
  • Who funds MILLENNIUM WATER ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds THE CARTER CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds HELEN KELLER INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds SESAME WORKSHOP ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds BRAC USA INC ↗
  • Who funds LA FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds THE NATIONAL CATHOLIC REPORTER PUBLISHING CO ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WATER4 INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Weingart FoundationThe Ralph M Parsons F…United Way IncVentura County Commun…The Rose Hills Founda…Sherwood Country Club…Shelter Partnership I…Liberty Hill Foundati…The Ahmanson Foundati…The James Irvine Foun…The California Wellne…The Annenberg Foundat…
Weingart FoundationCA84.2× affinity162 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Weingart Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · United Way Inc · Ventura County Community Foundation · The Rose Hills Foundation · Sherwood Country Club Charitable Foundation · Shelter Partnership Inc · Liberty Hill Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · The James Irvine Foundation · The California Wellness Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Conrad N Hilton Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Conrad N Hilton Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 17%
  • Hias Inc: 88% of income from government
  • Youthbuild Global Inc: 69% of income from government
  • Child Trends Inc: 50% of income from government
  • Mercy Corps: 47% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • International Youth Foundation: 17% of income from government
  • Community Catalyst Inc: 15% of income from government
  • Jobs for the Future Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation: 10% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Oxfam-America Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
49report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
3rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 2000 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Conrad N Hilton’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home