Skip to content

Texas · Public charity

Connecther

In our quest to alleviate poverty and advance women and girls globally, CONNECTHER provides a diverse communication platform, including the CONNECTHER film festival, to spotlight critical issues facing women and children throughout the world, and

$118k
Granted FY2023
1
Itemized grants FY2023
1
Organizations funded FY2023
100%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2023
$6k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2023
$6,000
Largest grant, FY2023
$6,000
Organizations funded a year
1 to 6
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2023
1
Total assets, FY2023
$256k

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 100% of the organizations Connecther funded were first-time grantees, receiving 100% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’22’23
InternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20231$6k100%
FY20222$20k50%
FY20202$20k0%
FY20193$46k33%
FY20183$47k33%
FY20176$74kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

International$117kHealth$29kEducation$28kEnvironment$20kHuman Services$13kCivil Rights$5k

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
CA
DC
TX
FL

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2023, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Connecther$55,201214%
Creating Hope International$49,93441%
Asian University for Women (Auw) Support Foundation$27,93830%
Ian Somerhalder Foundation$20,00016%
Edna Adan Hospital Foundation$18,80523%
Brac USA Inc$12,00010%
Childlife Foundation America I$10,19211%
The Citizens Foundation USA$7,36310%
Rohingya Women Development Network$6,0001n/a
Rozaria Memorial Trust$5,2501n/a

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Connecther supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetConnecther: $55,201 over 2y, 14% of budgetCreating Hope International: $49,934 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetAsian University for Women (Auw) Support Foundation: $27,938 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetIan Somerhalder Foundation: $20,000 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetEdna Adan Hospital Foundation: $18,805 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetBrac USA Inc: $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildlife Foundation America I: $10,192 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetThe Citizens Foundation USA: $7,363 over 1y, 0.1% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 8.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA8.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Connecther with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Connecther?

Find your warmest path to Connecther through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Connecther

How much does Connecther give?
Connecther reported 1 itemized grants totaling $6,000, out of $117,921 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2023 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 6 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does Connecther fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2023, its largest causes are International (55%), Health (14%), Education (13%).
Who are Connecther's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2023: Connecther ($55k), Creating Hope International ($50k), Asian University for Women (Auw) Support Foundation ($28k).
Does Connecther fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 100% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Connecther?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include National Philanthropic Trust, American Online Giving Foundation Inc, Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc.
Where is Connecther based?
Connecther is based in TX.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $309k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Connecther’s filings →

More from the funding graph