Skip to content
Conlin Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Conlin Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$12k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$154kEducation$154kReligion$98kHuman Services$92kYouth Development$60kHealth$59kInternational$15kHousing & Shelter$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,694
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GSM CHARITY AUCTIONS$4,725
CHILDRENS HOSPITAL OF PHILLIDELPHIA$3,000
CAMPFIRE CIRCLE$2,694
THE CALHOUN SCHOOL$1,276
ALZHEIMERS ASSOC$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–23, $28k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BLUE LIVES MATTER NYC: $2k → 11%BLUE LIVES MATTER NYC: $2k → 11%ASIAN AMERICAN FEDERATION: $25k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
IL
MI
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
CA
VA
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$432k · 14 repeat orgs$220k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
22

Total granted

$432k
$209k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+42%

Still filing today

43%
18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 10% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesReligionPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    SHELTERING ARMS CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $67k · revenue +12%
  • GIRLS GROUP
    4× · 2021–2024 · $45k · revenue +39%
  • SJ
    ST JOHN'S UNIVERSITY NEW YORK
    2× · 2019–2020 · $25k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • EC
    EPIPHANY COMMUNITY NURSERY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2019 · $40k
  • AA
    ASIAN AMERICAN FEDERATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +74%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $23k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Physician Affiliate Group of New York Pc

To provide accountable, responsive quality care with the highest degree of sensitivity to the needs of our diverse, multilingual population while fulfilling the professional and educational needs of our members.

Health
2
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
3
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
4
Police Athletic League Inc

Police athletic league, together with nypd and the law enforcement community, supports and inspires new york city youth to realize their full individual potential as productive members of society.

Youth Development
5
Center for Comprehensive Health Practice Inc

The center for comprehensive health practice, inc. provides accessible, community-based treatment that integrates primary healthcare with substance use and behavioral health services for all children, adolescents, adults, and families…

Health
6
Montefiore New Rochelle Hospital

Mission: to heal, to teach, to discover and to advance the health of the communities we serve. values: humanity, innovation, teamwork, diversity and equity - our values define our philosophy of care. they shape our actions and motivate and…

Health
7
Newyork-Presbyterianbrooklyn Methodist

To provide excellent healthcare services without regard to age, sex, race, creed, national origin or disability; to serve as an educational and research center for physicians, nurses and healthcare professionals; to provide health…

—
8
Jewish Board of Family & Children's Services Inc

To empower new yorkers, providing integrated mental health and social services with compassion and expertise.

Human Services
9
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
New York Foundling

The new york foundling, in the tradition of openness and compassion of its sponsors, the sisters of charity, helps children, youth, adults, and families in need through services, supports, and advocacy that strengthen family and community…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sheltering Arms Children and Family Services Inc; the most unlike its peers is World Bicycle Relief Nfp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/14
Grantees still filing
8/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SHELTERING ARMS CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $66,600 · OtherSHELTERING ARMS CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES INCFR GABRIEL RICHARD HIGH SCHOOL: $65,000 · OtherFR GABRIEL RICHARD HIGH SCHOOLST FRANCIS OF ASSISI: $50,000 · OtherST FRANCIS OF ASSISIJPMS LLC: $45,000 · OtherJPMS LLCEPIPHANY COMMUNITY NURSERY SCHOOL: $40,000 · OtherEPIPHANY COMMUNITY NURSERY SCHOOLSPASTIC PARAPARESIS FOUNDATION: $35,000 · OtherSPASTIC PARAPARESIS FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $23,800 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $22,500 · OtherTRINITY BAPTIST CHURCH: $22,338 · OtherUNITED WAY OF CANADA (WORLDWIDE): $18,750 · Other+18 more: $85,994 · Other+18 moreGIRLS GROUP: $45,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRLS GROU…MANCHESTER POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE: $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentMANCHESTER…ST JOHN'S UNIVERSITY NEW YORK: $25,350 · EducationTHE CALHOUN SCHOOL INC: $23,476 · EducationASIAN AMERICAN FEDERATION INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesBLUE LIVES MATTER - NYC INC: $3,003 · Human ServicesWORLD BICYCLE RELIEF NFP: $14,500 · Public Safety & DisasterPackard Health Inc: $10,000 · HealthTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $3,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $500 · HealthTHE FATHER'S HEART MINISTRIES: $6,350 · ReligionGOTHAM FOOD PANTRY INC: $5,500 · Food & Nutrition
Other$474,982Youth Development$60,000Education$48,826Human Services$28,003Public Safety & Disaster$14,500Health$13,500Religion$6,350Food & Nutrition$5,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSHELTERING ARMS CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $66,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGIRLS GROUP: $45,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetST JOHN'S UNIVERSITY NEW YORK: $25,350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetASIAN AMERICAN FEDERATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CALHOUN SCHOOL INC: $23,476 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMANCHESTER POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE: $15,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetWORLD BICYCLE RELIEF NFP: $14,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPackard Health Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FATHER'S HEART MINISTRIES: $6,350 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetGOTHAM FOOD PANTRY INC: $5,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBLUE LIVES MATTER - NYC INC: $3,003 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SHELTERING ARMS CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS GROUP ↗
  • Who funds EPIPHANY COMMUNITY NURSERY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds ST JOHN'S UNIVERSITY NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds ASIAN AMERICAN FEDERATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CALHOUN SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds MANCHESTER POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds WORLD BICYCLE RELIEF NFP ↗
  • Who funds Packard Health Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE FATHER'S HEART MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds GOTHAM FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds BLUE LIVES MATTER - NYC INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gs Donor Advised Phil…Raymond James Charita…Paypal Charitable Giv…National Philanthropi…American Online Givin…The Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…Natl Christian Charit…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management IncNY11.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Conlin Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Conlin Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Conlin Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home