Skip to content

· Public charity

Confrerie de La Chaine Des Rotisseurs Foundation Inc

To promote and foster the culinary arts and wine knowledge by supporting university level and similar educational programs throughout the country.

$122k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$21k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$516kFood & Nutrition$35k
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $56,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $122,020 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $66,020 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$20,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$509k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JOHNSON & WALES University$21,000
Renton Technical College Foundation$20,000
FAIRLEIGH DICKINSON UNIVERSITY$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 44% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%PITTSBURG TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $25k → 11%WALNUT HILL COLLEGE: $10k → 22%Glancy Wine Education Foundation: $10k → 12%CULINARY INSTITUTE OF AMERICA: $31k → 9%SUNY Cobleskill Foundation: $10k → 10%DCCC Foundation: $6k → 14%AMERICAN CULINARY FEDERATION: $10k → 6%Des Moines Area Community College Foundation: $9k → 10%Madison Area Technical College Foundation: $20k → 10%JOHNSON & WALES: $26k → 14%BWANA Organization: $20k → 14%IVY TECH FOUNDATION: $12k → 16%Cincinnati State Foundation: $10k → 16%Renton Technical College Foundation: $20k → 9%FAIRLEIGH DICKINSON UNIVERSITY: $25k → 4%L'ACADEMIE DE CUISINE: $25k → 8%CULINARY INSTITUTE OF AMERICA: $25k → 9%AMERICAN CULINARY FEDERATION: $10k → 6%JOHNSON & WALES: $25k → 14%RENTON TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $10k → 9%FAIRLEIGH DICKINSON UNIVERSITY: $15k → 4%CULINARY INSTITUTE OF AMERICA: $25k → 9%AMERICAN CULINARY FEDERATION: $10k → 6%JOHNSON & WALES University: $21k → 14%FAIRLEIGH DICKINSON UNIVERSITY: $15k → 4%CULINARY INSTITUTE OF AMERICA: $15k → 9%JOHNSON & WALES University: $15k → 14%FAIRLEIGH DICKINSON UNIVERSITY: $15k → 4%FAIRLEIGH DICKINSON UNIVERSITY: $10k → 4%FAIRLEIGH DICKINSON UNIVERSITY: $10k → 4%FAIRLEIGH DICKINSON UNIVERSITY: $8k → 4%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
WI
NY
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
RI
CA
MD
KS
SC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$340k · 5 repeat orgs$211k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
14

Total granted

$340k
$211k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-6%
+60%

Still filing today

100%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Fairleigh Dickinson University
    7× · 2017–2024 · $98k · revenue -6%
  • CULINARY INSTITUTE OF AMERICA
    4× · 2017–2022 · $96k · revenue +29%
  • JW
    JOHNSON & WALES UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2017–2024 · $87k · revenue -33%

Funded once

  • TT
    TRIDENT TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue +21%
  • PT
    PITTSBURGH TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC
    one grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue -35%
  • LD
    L'ACADEMIE DE CUISINE
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Foundation for Florida Gateway College Inc

The foundation provides academic scholarships and financial support to the college.

Education
2
Dunwoody College of Technology

Dunwoody college changes lives by building opportunities for graduates to have successful careers, to develop into leaders and entrepreneurs, and to engage in "the better performance of life's duties." quote is from the last will and…

Education
3
Southwest Wisconsin Technical College Foundation Inc

Provide scholarships and assistance to students and faculty for the primary benefit of southwest wisconsin technical college.

—
4
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
5
Northcentral Technical College Foundation Inc

The ntc foundation develops relationships that enable individuals, businesses and the community to advocate for and provide resources in support of northcentral technical college in accomplishing its mission.

—
6
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
7
Dakota County Technical College Foundation

The dctc foundation's mission is to foster student success and elevate the academic experience at dakota county technical college by securing resources through strong partnerships with employers, alumni, and the community.

—
8
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

—
9
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
10
St Francis College

St. francis college is an independent, coeducational institution of higher education chartered by an act of the regents of the university of the state of new york on april 10, 1957.

Education
11
Cornell College

Cornell college offers an innovative and rigorous learning community where faculty and staff collaborate with students to develop the intellectual curiosity, creativity and moral courage necessary for a lifetime of learning and engaged…

Education
12
Lafayette College

Chartered in 1826, lafayette college is dedicated to excellence in undergraduate education. students are engaged in a transformative educational experience that bridges the liberal arts, engineering, and interdisciplinary study. the…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Trident Technical College Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Cobleskill Community Activities Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
9/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Fairleigh Dickinson University: $97,500 · EducationFairleigh Dickinson UniversityCULINARY INSTITUTE OF AMERICA: $95,750 · EducationCULINARY INSTITUTE OF AMERICAJOHNSON & WALES UNIVERSITY: $86,500 · EducationJOHNSON & WALES UNIVERSITYRENTON TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $30,000 · EducationRENTON TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATIONTRIDENT TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · EducationTRIDENT TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INCPITTSBURGH TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC: $25,000 · EducationPITTSBURGH TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INCMADISON AREA TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · Education+6 more: $54,750 · Education+6 moreAmerican Culinary Federation Inc: $30,000 · OtherAmerican Culinary Fed…L'ACADEMIE DE CUISINE: $25,000 · OtherL'ACADEMIE DE CUISINEJOHNSON COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $21,000 · OtherJOHNSON COUNTY COMMUN…HOSPITALITY FORWARD CORPORATION: $20,000 · OtherHOSPITALITY FORWARD C…WALNUT HILL COLLEGE: $10,000 · OtherWALNUT HILL COLLEGECOBLESKILL COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Philanthropy
Education$434,500Other$106,000Philanthropy$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFairleigh Dickinson University: $97,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCULINARY INSTITUTE OF AMERICA: $95,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNSON & WALES UNIVERSITY: $86,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Culinary Federation Inc: $30,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetRENTON TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetTRIDENT TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetPITTSBURGH TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMADISON AREA TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetIVY TECH FOUNDATION INC: $12,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCINCINNATI STATE TECHNICAL AND COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOBLESKILL COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 37% of budgetGLANCY WINE EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 27% of budgetNational Louis University: $8,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDMACC FOUNDATION: $8,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDALLAS COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $5,750 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA6.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Confrerie de La Chaine Des Rotisseurs Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Confrerie de La Chaine Des Rotisseurs Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Fairleigh Dickinson University: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Confrerie de La Chaine Des Rotisseurs’ filings →

More from the funding graph