Skip to content
Confraternity of Our Lady of Grace at a glance

· Public charity

Confraternity of Our Lady of Grace

To provide opportunities for fellowship with other devoted members of the roman catholic church.

$62k
Granted FY2022
2
Grants FY2022
2
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Health$149kReligion$55kHuman Services$33kHousing & Shelter$11kPhilanthropy$5kPublic Safety & Disaster$1k
02FY2022 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $11,046, the rows itemized in this filing. The $62,296 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $51,250 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$6,046
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$6,046
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 47% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND: $3k → 10%LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND: $2k → 10%LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND: $2k → 10%CATHOLIC WORKERS: $4k → 7%CATHOLIC WORKERS: $3k → 7%CATHOLIC WORKERS: $2k → 7%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
PA
CA
MO
MD
TN
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$227k · 20 repeat orgs$23k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2022, 18 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
7

Total granted

$227k
$23k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+46%

Still filing today

60%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22
HealthHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    6× · 2017–2022 · $25k · revenue +33%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    5× · 2018–2022 · $21k · revenue +125%
  • AD
    ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC
    4× · 2018–2021 · $15k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • CC
    Catholic Charities San Bernardino & Riverside Counties
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue -19%
  • AA
    ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • SJ
    ST JUDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
2
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
3
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
4
Lehigh Valley Hospital

Our mission is to heal, comfort and care for the people of our community by providing advanced and compassionate health care of superior quality and value, supported by education and research.

Health
5
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
6
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
7
Baylor Research Institute

To improve the care and well being of our community, nationally and internationally, through innovative clinically relevant research that is consistent with the mission, vision and values of Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH).

Health
8
The Heart Foundation

The heart foundation (thf) was created to save lives from heart disease by increasing awareness, educating the public, and supporting innovative research at smidt heart institute at cedars-sinai medical center in los angeles, california.…

Philanthropy
9
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

As a leading academic healthcare organization, our mission is to elevate the health status of the communities we serve.(see schedule o for continuation)(continued)-we deliver exceptional healthcare enhanced by research and education-we…

Health
10
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
11
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
12
Lung Cancer Research Foundation

The mission of the lung cancer research foundation is to improve lung cancer outcomes by funding research for the prevention, diagnosis, treatment and cure of lung cancer.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Jude Children's Research Hospital Inc; the most unlike its peers is Catholic Worker Hospitality House. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
12/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CAPUCHIN FRANCISCANS WESTERN AMERICAN PROVINCE: $20,300 · OtherCAPUCHIN FRANCISCANS WESTERN AMERICAN PROVINCEEPILEPSY FOUNDATION: $19,300 · OtherEPILEPSY FOUNDATIONNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR CANCER RESEARCH: $19,000 · OtherNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR CANCER RESEARCHVeterans of Foreign Wars of The United States: $14,000 · OtherVeterans of Foreign Wars of The United StatesST ANTHONYS: $13,000 · OtherST ANTHONYSMONASTERY OF POOR CLARES: $11,000 · OtherMONASTERY OF POOR CLARESCatholic Charities San Bernardino & Riverside Counties: $10,000 · OtherCatholic Charities San Bernardino & Riverside CountiesALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION: $5,000 · OtherST JUDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $5,000 · Other+6 more: $10,900 · Other+6 moreAmerican Heart Association Inc: $25,046 · HealthAmerican Heart Association IncST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $21,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INCALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $15,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS A…Children's Hospital Los Angeles: $15,000 · HealthChildren's Hospital Los AngelesAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $7,000 · HealthAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATIONBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $5,000 · HealthThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $4,000 · Health+1 more: $2,000 · HealthCATHOLIC WORKER HOSPITALITY HOUSE: $9,000 · Human ServicesLIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED: $7,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,000 · Human ServicesShepherds Gate: $11,000 · Housing & ShelterNORTH VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Philanthropy
Other$127,500Health$94,046Human Services$17,000Housing & Shelter$11,000Philanthropy$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $25,046 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $21,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $15,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $15,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetVeterans of Foreign Wars of The United States: $14,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetShepherds Gate: $11,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCatholic Charities San Bernardino & Riverside Counties: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCATHOLIC WORKER HOSPITALITY HOUSE: $9,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $7,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED: $7,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetADULT CONGENITAL HEART ASSOCIATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles ↗
  • Who funds Veterans of Foreign Wars of The United States ↗
  • Who funds Shepherds Gate ↗
  • Who funds Catholic Charities San Bernardino & Riverside Counties ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC WORKER HOSPITALITY HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds ADULT CONGENITAL HEART ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charit…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Confraternity of Our Lady of Grace funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Confraternity of Our Lady of Grace. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $59k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Confraternity of Our Lady of Grace’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home