· Private foundation
Concannon Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k15 grants · $42k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CCAE THEATRICALS | $25,000 |
| ECC CHARITABLE FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| COMMUNITY LUTHERAN CHURCH | $7,500 |
| THE UTAH FILM CENTER | $5,000 |
| SAN DIEGO CHILDREN'S MUSEUM | $5,000 |
| ESCONDIDO CREEK CONSERVANCY | $5,000 |
| JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES | $4,000 |
| MISSION TRAILS REGIONAL PARK FOUNDATION | $4,000 |
| SOUTHERN UTAH WILDERNESS ALLIANCE | $2,000 |
| THE BICYCLE COLLECTIVE SLC | $2,000 |
| ESCONDIDO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $2,000 |
| RURAL HEALTH CARE INITIATIVE | $1,500 |
| AMAZING SKI & SNOW PEOPLE | $1,000 |
| ACLU | $1,000 |
| ESCONDIDO EDUCATION FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–22, $47k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +63% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.
22 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SDSAN DIEGO CHILDREN'S DISCOVERY MUSEUM2× · 2023–2024 · $45k · revenue +4%
- SUSouthern Utah Wilderness Alliance7× · 2018–2025 · $27k · revenue +134%
- TITHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC4× · 2018–2022 · $24k · revenue +178%
Funded once
- ICInterfaith Community Services Incone grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue -20%
HEALTHRIGHT 360graduatedone grant, 2023 · $17k · revenue +35%- LCLorraine Civil Rights Museum Foundationgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $15k · revenue +125%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.
Acquire, manage and protect land in perpetuity that supports sensitive habitats and species, and to educate and inspire people and communities as stewards and advocates of their natural environment.
The Environmental Health Coalition is dedicated to achieving environmental and social justice. We believe that justice is accomplished by empowered communities acting together to make social change. We organize and advocate to protect…
On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…
Just safe's mission is to educate the public about the needs of communities most impacted by crime, violence, and incarceration; and promote new safety solutions through community-building, leadership development, grassroots mobilization,…
Sustainable Conservation advances the collaborative stewardship of Californias land, air, and water for the benefit of nature and people. For over three decades, Sustainable Conservation has built coalitions of people with different…
Nature collective's mission is to drive a passion for nature for all. we think inclusively and diversely when serving those devoid of nature those who remember nature and want to connect back to it and those who have an affinity with…
California Streets Initiative is a non-profit that practices solutions journalism at its five news websites listed above to educate inform and empower its readers.
To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.
To improve the quality of life for the diverse communities we serve providing affordable and comprehensive healthcare and education in a welcoming multi-cultural environment.
Conserving nature through science and discovery.
RTFH exists to reduce and end homelessness in San Diego, ensuring that if this situation does happen for anyone, it remains a rare, brief and non-recurring instance; not an outcome.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The San Diego Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Escondido Education Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 10% of your grantees by number, and just 18% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SAN DIEGO CHILDREN'S DISCOVERY MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds CCAE THEATRICALS INC ↗
- Who funds Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance ↗
- Who funds THE ESCONDIDO CREEK CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds Interfaith Community Services Inc ↗
- Who funds THE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds RURAL HEALTH CARE INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds HEALTHRIGHT 360 ↗
- Who funds 1IN6 INC ↗
- Who funds Lorraine Civil Rights Museum Foundation ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO ↗
- Who funds SAVING HUEY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The Street Dog Coalition ↗
- Who funds THORN ↗
- Who funds Catholics for Choice ↗
- Who funds Feeding America ↗
- Who funds WASATCH ADAPTIVE SPORTS INC ↗
- Who funds HUDSON LINK FOR HIGHER EDUCATION IN PRISON INC ↗
- Who funds UTAH FILM CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Mission Trails Regional Park Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds ESCONDIDO HISTORY CENTER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The San Diego Foundation · East County Economic Development Council · Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · Price Philanthropies Foundation · The Conrad Prebys Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Concannon Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Concannon Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Concannon Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.