Skip to content

· Private foundation

Conboy Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$240k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$814kHuman Services$430kPhilanthropy$325kCivil Rights$190kEducation$156kHealth$45kYouth Development$44kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $40k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $200k
$100,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CITY HEARTS KIDS SAY YES TO THE ARTS$100,000
UNCHAINED AT LAST$100,000
THE HARMONY PROJECT$20,000
CAPE IVE$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $430k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%UNCHAINED AT LAST: $150k → 10%UNCHAINED AT LAST: $100k → 10%UNCHAINED AT LAST: $100k → 10%UNCHAINED AT LAST: $80k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
NY
NJ
RI
CA
CO
MO
VA
MS
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 13 repeat orgs$365k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
9

Total granted

$1.9M
$345k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+36%

Still filing today

62%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementHealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UA
    UNCHAINED AT LAST INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $430k · revenue +20%
  • PP
    PRISON PERFORMING ARTS
    4× · 2019–2022 · $195k · revenue +12%
  • WC
    WILFANDEL CLUB
    3× · 2021–2024 · $159k · revenue +893%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $130k
  • RT
    ROSIE'S THEATER KIDS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $45k · revenue +36%
  • CH
    CITY HEARTS SAY YES TO ARTS
    one grant, 2023 · $40k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Project Performing Arts Inc

Provide high quality low cost performing arts classes to underserved children in Harlem and the surrounding neigborhoods.

Arts & Culture
2
Connecting Through the Arts and Edu
—
3
The Performance Project Inc

A not for profit cultural organization dedicated to providing quality performing arts experiences and educational children theatre and a school for the arts

Arts & Culture
4
Children Theater Project

To enhance young peoples minds through education, application and exploration of the Performing Arts. It further strives to provide each child with a feeling of self-identity and purpose.

Arts & Culture
5
Lachey Arts Inc

Lachey arts, inc. is focused on using the arts to build a diverse community of young artists, empowering the creative spirit and giving the confidence and tools to change the world.

Arts & Culture
6
Children Arts & More
Education
7
Limitless Performing Arts

Performing arts education to underrepresented populations

Arts & Culture
8
Inner-City Arts

Inner-city arts believes that the arts and creativity are transformational, and we envision a society that honors the human capacity for creativity, and values its cultivation in the education of young people. inner-city arts uses arts…

Arts & Culture
9
Christian Theater Arts Project

Ctap is committed to the higest ethical, moral, techical and artistic standard of excellance. ctap hopes to train children in the performing arts, build leadership skills, develop a sense of community and provide positive, godly role…

Arts & Culture
10
The H E Art Project dba Artworxla

Artworxla combats the high school dropout crisis by engaging students in a long-term, sequential arts program offering a pursuable life path that inspires them to stay in school, evolve as unique individuals and flourish as creative adults.

Arts & Culture
11
Rock Theatre

Instilling a desire in young people to learn to participate in live performances of song and dance.

—
12
Cliffside Artists Collaborative Inc
Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Harmony Project; the most unlike its peers is Cape Ivy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MCT INC: $200,000 · OtherMCT INCPRISON PERFORMING ARTS: $194,787 · OtherPRISON PERFORMING ARTSUNCHAINED AT LAST: $190,000 · OtherUNCHAINED AT LASTIndividual grant recipient: $130,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCITY ARTSKIDS SAY YES TO THE ARTS: $120,870 · OtherCITY ARTSKIDS SAY YES TO THE ARTSLAS CASAS FOUNDATIONS: $95,000 · OtherLAS CASAS FOUNDATIONSCITY HEARTS SAY YES TO ARTS: $40,000 · OtherMULTIPLE SCLEROSIS: $40,000 · Other+5 more: $100,000 · Other+5 moreUNCHAINED AT LAST INC: $430,000 · Human ServicesUNCHAINED AT LAST INCTHE CENTER FOR DYNAMIC LEARNING INC: $146,100 · Arts & CultureTHE CENTER FO…ROSIE'S THEATER KIDS INC: $45,000 · Arts & CultureROSIE'S THEAT…STREET SYMPHONY PROJECT INC: $45,000 · Arts & CultureSTREET SYMPHO…DRAWCHANGE INC: $30,000 · Arts & CultureDRAWCHANGE IN…CITY HEARTS KIDS SAY YES TO THE ARTS LA FRINGE THEATRE INC: $150,000 · Youth DevelopmentCITY HEAR…THE ACADEMY PROJECT: $44,267 · Youth DevelopmentTHE ACADE…WILFANDEL CLUB: $158,830 · Community ImprovementCAPE IVY: $45,000 · HealthHarmony Project: $20,000 · Education
Other$1,110,657Human Services$430,000Arts & Culture$266,100Youth Development$194,267Community Improvement$158,830Health$45,000Education$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNCHAINED AT LAST INC: $430,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetPRISON PERFORMING ARTS: $194,787 over 4y, 20% of budgetWILFANDEL CLUB: $158,830 over 3y, 12% of budgetCITY HEARTS KIDS SAY YES TO THE ARTS LA FRINGE THEATRE INC: $150,000 over 2y, 22% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR DYNAMIC LEARNING INC: $146,100 over 2y, 23% of budgetCAPE IVY: $45,000 over 4y, 28% of budgetROSIE'S THEATER KIDS INC: $45,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetSTREET SYMPHONY PROJECT INC: $45,000 over 2y, 7.4% of budgetDRAWCHANGE INC: $30,000 over 1y, 28% of budgetHarmony Project: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHATTIESBURG ARTS COUNCIL: $10,000 over 1y, 6.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNCHAINED AT LAST INC ↗
  • Who funds PRISON PERFORMING ARTS ↗
  • Who funds WILFANDEL CLUB ↗
  • Who funds CITY HEARTS KIDS SAY YES TO THE ARTS LA FRINGE THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR DYNAMIC LEARNING INC ↗
  • Who funds CAPE IVY ↗
  • Who funds ROSIE'S THEATER KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds STREET SYMPHONY PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ACADEMY PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds DRAWCHANGE INC ↗
  • Who funds Harmony Project ↗
  • Who funds HATTIESBURG ARTS COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds ST ELMO VILLAGE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community FoundationCA12.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Conboy Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Conboy Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Conboy Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Conboy Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Conboy’s filings →

    More from the funding graph