Skip to content

· Private foundation

Con Amor Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$34k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$445kReligion$84kEnvironment$10kInternational$9kHousing & Shelter$9kAnimals$4kPublic Safety & Disaster$4kScience & Tech$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$4,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$158k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$4,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Conservation International$2,000
Doctors Without Borders$1,000
W M Keck Observatory$500
World Wildlife Fund$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 94% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Spiritual Formation Society of Ariz: $5k → 11%NOVA: $7k → 10%Jezebel Powers: $4k → 13%Evalani George: $7k → 15%Alycia Tingley: $4k → 13%Tionna Fenenigog: $4k → 14%The Field School: $5k → 14%Spiritual Formation Society of Ariz: $5k → 11%NOVA: $7k → 10%Jezebel Powers: $4k → 13%Betty Isaac: $7k → 15%Alycia Tingley: $4k → 13%Tionna Fenenigog: $4k → 14%Church Resources Ministry: $7k → 10%JEZEBEL POWERS: $4k → 13%Keolohilani H Lopes Jr: $4k → 9%Natron Endor: $4k → 15%Alycia Tingely: $4k → 13%Tionna Fenenigog: $4k → 14%NOVA: $7k → 10%Kaichy George: $4k → 15%Church Resources Ministry: $7k → 10%Singkitchy George: $4k → 15%Nora Hernandez: $4k → 10%Trenay Helieisar: $4k → 15%Nora Hernandez: $4k → 10%Emmanuel Faith Community Church: $9k → 11%Keolohilani H Lopes Jr: $4k → 9%Natron Endor: $4k → 15%Emmanuel Faith Community Church: $7k → 11%KEOLOHILANI LOPES: $4k → 9%Marvin Ligohr: $4k → 15%Nora Hernandez: $4k → 10%Aldair Magadan: $6k → 11%Keolohilani H Lopes Jr: $4k → 9%Dartagnun Danny Fredrick: $4k → 15%Emmanuel Faith Community Church: $5k → 11%Keolohilani H Lopes Jr: $4k → 9%Nena Nena Jr: $4k → 15%Aldair Magadan: $4k → 11%Keolohilani H Lopes Jr: $4k → 9%KESRINIA ELIDOK: $4k → 15%Lynette Nguyen: $4k → 11%Keolohilani H Lopes Jr: $4k → 9%ANNTASHIA RETTIN: $4k → 15%Savannah Kahoopii: $6k → 9%Pacific Resources for Education Lea: $6k → 9%Savannah Kahoopii: $8k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
OR
CA
VA
MD
AZ
DC
HI
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 9% of Con Amor Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Con Amor Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$531k · 49 repeat orgs$63k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +28% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

49 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 39 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

49
22

Total granted

$531k
$59k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+26%

Still filing today

18%
23%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsEnvironmentInternationalArts & CultureEducationReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    SPIRITUAL FORMATION SOCIETY OF ARIZONA
    3× · 2022–2024 · $13k · revenue +11%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $9k · revenue +98%
  • WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $5k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • PR
    Pacific Resources for Education Lea
    one grant, 2018 · $6k
  • FC
    Faith Christian Academy
    one grant, 2020 · $6k
  • TF
    THE FIELD SCHOOLgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +852%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
African Wildlife Foundation Inc

Awf's mission is to ensure wildlife and wild lands thrive in modern africa. we work to equip african governments, institutions, business, and communities with the tools, insights, and support they need to define, own, and realize a…

Animals
2
For the Fishes

To address, educate, coordinate, and enhance enforcement capacity to end teh trade in coral reef wildlife for household and other small display aquariums. our supply and demand side strategies are directed locally and globally to…

Animals
3
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
4
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
5
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals
6
Blue World Foundation Inc

To stabilize the population of marine species in danger, especially sharks and rays in the caribbean of guatemala; through science and community strengthening which will provide the creation of alternative livelihoods, which eventually…

Environment
7
Wildlife Conservation Society

The wildlife conservation society (wcs) saves wildlife and wild places worldwide through science, conservation action, education, and inspiring people to value nature.

Animals
8
Pacific Bird Conservation

To ensure the continued existence of pacific island birds that are under threat from introduced species and habitat loss.

Animals
9
Panthera Corporation

Panthera's mission is the conservation of the world's 40 wild cat species, many of which are endangered or threatened. panthera develops, implements and oversees wild cat conservation strategies on a global scale.

Animals
10
Ocean Conservancy

Ocean conservancy unites science, people, and policy to protect our ocean, today and for generations to come.

Environment
11
Rainforest Alliance Inc

RA works at the intersection of business, agriculture & forests to improve lives & protect nature by transforming how land is used, production of goods & consumer choices.

—
12
The Coral Reef and Marine Science Foundation Inc C/O James Bildner
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oceana Inc; the most unlike its peers is Cascade Aids Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 73 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
10/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $28,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $24,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $23,000 · OtherEMMANUEL FAITH COMMUNITY CHURCH INC: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherNOVA: $19,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $19,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $19,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $18,500 · Other+51 more: $312,207 · Other+51 moreSPIRITUAL FORMATION SOCIETY OF ARIZONA: $13,000 · ReligionMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $9,000 · InternationalLIFESONG FOR ORPHANS INC: $400 · InternationalWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $4,600 · EnvironmentCONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $2,000 · EnvironmentOCEANA INC: $1,000 · EnvironmentTHE FIELD SCHOOL: $5,000 · EducationRAINBOW FRIENDS ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $1,400 · AnimalsZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO: $1,359 · AnimalsWILDLIFE ALLIANCE INC: $900 · AnimalsCALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH IN ASTRONOMY: $2,100 · Science & Tech
Other$553,207Religion$13,000International$9,400Environment$7,600Education$5,000Animals$3,659Science & Tech$2,100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSPIRITUAL FORMATION SOCIETY OF ARIZONA: $13,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FIELD SCHOOL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $4,600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH IN ASTRONOMY: $2,100 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRAINBOW FRIENDS ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $1,400 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO: $1,359 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOCEANA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWILDLIFE ALLIANCE INC: $900 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCASCADE AIDS PROJECT: $770 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKAMUELA PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA SOCIETY: $600 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetLIFESONG FOR ORPHANS INC: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGALAPAGOS CONSERVANCY INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKahilu Theatre Foundation: $220 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SPIRITUAL FORMATION SOCIETY OF ARIZONA ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FIELD SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN8.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Con Amor Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Con Amor Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 13%
  • Cascade Aids Project: 13% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Con Amor Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Con Amor Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 73 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Con Amor’s filings →

More from the funding graph