Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Con Amor Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$34k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$445kReligion$84kEnvironment$10kInternational$9kHousing & Shelter$9kAnimals$4kPublic Safety & Disaster$4kScience & Tech$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$4,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$158k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$4,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
Conservation International$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Doctors Without Borders$1,000
World Wildlife Fund$500
W M Keck Observatory$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 94% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Spiritual Formation Society of Ariz: $5k → 11%Church Resources Ministry: $7k → 10%Jezebel Powers: $4k → 13%Evalani George: $7k → 15%Alycia Tingely: $4k → 13%Tionna Fenenigog: $4k → 14%The Field School: $5k → 14%Spiritual Formation Society of Ariz: $5k → 11%NOVA: $7k → 10%Jezebel Powers: $4k → 13%Betty Isaac: $7k → 15%Alycia Tingley: $4k → 13%Tionna Fenenigog: $4k → 14%NOVA: $7k → 10%JEZEBEL POWERS: $4k → 13%Keolohilani H Lopes Jr: $4k → 9%Leonard Panuelo: $4k → 15%Alycia Tingley: $4k → 13%Tionna Fenenigog: $4k → 14%NOVA: $7k → 10%Kesrinia Elidok: $4k → 15%Church Resources Ministry: $7k → 10%Nena Nena Jr: $4k → 15%Nora Hernandez: $4k → 10%Anntashia Rettin: $4k → 15%Nora Hernandez: $4k → 10%Emmanuel Faith Community Church: $9k → 11%KEOLOHILANI LOPES: $4k → 9%BASIL GEORGE: $4k → 15%Emmanuel Faith Community Church: $7k → 11%Keolohilani H Lopes Jr: $4k → 9%Trenay Helieisar: $4k → 15%Nora Hernandez: $4k → 10%Aldair Magadan: $6k → 11%Keolohilani H Lopes Jr: $4k → 9%NATRON ENDOR: $4k → 15%Emmanuel Faith Community Church: $5k → 11%Keolohilani H Lopes Jr: $4k → 9%Natron Endor: $4k → 15%Aldair Magadan: $4k → 11%Keolohilani H Lopes Jr: $4k → 9%Felix Shemar: $4k → 15%Katelyn Seward: $4k → 11%Keolohilani H Lopes Jr: $4k → 9%Singkitchy George: $4k → 15%Savannah Kahoopii: $6k → 9%Pacific Resources for Education Lea: $6k → 9%Savannah Kahoopii: $8k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
IL
NY
OR
CA
VA
MD
AZ
DC
HI
GA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 9% of Con Amor Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Con Amor Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$531k · 49 repeat orgs$63k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.

49 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 39 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

49
22

Total granted

$531k
$59k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+26%

Still filing today

18%
23%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsEnvironmentInternationalArts & CultureEducationReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    SPIRITUAL FORMATION SOCIETY OF ARIZONA
    3× · 2022–2024 · $13k · revenue +11%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $9k · revenue +98%
  • WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $5k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • PR
    Pacific Resources for Education Lea
    one grant, 2018 · $6k
  • FC
    Faith Christian Academy
    one grant, 2020 · $6k
  • TF
    THE FIELD SCHOOLgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +852%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
African Wildlife Foundation Inc

Awf's mission is to ensure wildlife and wild lands thrive in modern africa. we work to equip african governments, institutions, business, and communities with the tools, insights, and support they need to define, own, and realize a…

Animals
2
For the Fishes

To address, educate, coordinate, and enhance enforcement capacity to end teh trade in coral reef wildlife for household and other small display aquariums. our supply and demand side strategies are directed locally and globally to…

Animals
3
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
4
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
5
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals
6
Blue World Foundation Inc

To stabilize the population of marine species in danger, especially sharks and rays in the caribbean of guatemala; through science and community strengthening which will provide the creation of alternative livelihoods, which eventually…

Environment
7
Wildlife Conservation Society

The wildlife conservation society (wcs) saves wildlife and wild places worldwide through science, conservation action, education, and inspiring people to value nature.

Animals
8
Pacific Bird Conservation

To ensure the continued existence of pacific island birds that are under threat from introduced species and habitat loss.

Animals
9
Panthera Corporation

Panthera's mission is the conservation of the world's 40 wild cat species, many of which are endangered or threatened. panthera develops, implements and oversees wild cat conservation strategies on a global scale.

Animals
10
Ocean Conservancy

Ocean conservancy unites science, people, and policy to protect our ocean, today and for generations to come.

Environment
11
Rainforest Alliance Inc

RA works at the intersection of business, agriculture & forests to improve lives & protect nature by transforming how land is used, production of goods & consumer choices.

12
The Coral Reef and Marine Science Foundation Inc C/O James Bildner

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oceana Inc and the most unlike its peers is Cascade Aids Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 73 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
11/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $28,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $24,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $23,000 · OtherEMMANUEL FAITH COMMUNITY CHURCH INC — $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $20,000 · OtherNOVA — $19,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $19,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $19,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $18,500 · Other+51 more — $312,207 · Other+51 moreSPIRITUAL FORMATION SOCIETY OF ARIZONA — $13,000 · ReligionMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $9,000 · InternationalLIFESONG FOR ORPHANS INC — $400 · InternationalWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $4,600 · EnvironmentCONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION — $2,000 · EnvironmentOCEANA INC — $1,000 · EnvironmentTHE FIELD SCHOOL — $5,000 · EducationRAINBOW FRIENDS ANIMAL SANCTUARY — $1,400 · AnimalsZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO — $1,359 · AnimalsWILDLIFE ALLIANCE INC — $900 · AnimalsCALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH IN ASTRONOMY — $2,100 · Science & Tech
Other$553,207Religion$13,000International$9,400Environment$7,600Education$5,000Animals$3,659Science & Tech$2,100

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSPIRITUAL FORMATION SOCIETY OF ARIZONA — $13,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FIELD SCHOOL — $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $4,600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH IN ASTRONOMY — $2,100 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRAINBOW FRIENDS ANIMAL SANCTUARY — $1,400 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO — $1,359 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOCEANA INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWILDLIFE ALLIANCE INC — $900 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCASCADE AIDS PROJECT — $770 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKAMUELA PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA SOCIETY — $600 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetLIFESONG FOR ORPHANS INC — $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGALAPAGOS CONSERVANCY INC — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKahilu Theatre Foundation — $220 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SPIRITUAL FORMATION SOCIETY OF ARIZONA
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
  • Who funds THE FIELD SCHOOL
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN8.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Con Amor Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 13%
  • Cascade Aids Project13% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Con Amor Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Con Amor Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 73 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph