How much did COMMUNITY VISION CAPITAL & CONSULTING grant in FY2024?

Community Improvement$192kHousing & Shelter$156kEnvironment$92kEducation$40kPhilanthropy$30kCrime & Legal$30kEmployment$28kHealth$25kArts & Culture$20kOther$322k

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

—

2020

—

2021

blackcdfisfoundedfood systemfresnolandindigenous

2022

healthneighborhoodshousingeconomicneighborhoodhomeownershipstewardship

2023

advocateslittle manilacreatehistoriclandindigenoushealthy

2024

landindigenoussogoreanative

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

$10k–50k2 grants · $72k
$50k–250k1 grant · $57k

$35,775

Median grant

States reached

$162M

Total assets

Largest grants

REVOLUTIONARY ECONOMY FOR ALL LOCAL PEOPLE'S FUND$57,038
SOGOREA TE' LAND TRUST$35,775
FIRST NATIONS DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE$35,775

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13% — the area typically sits at 11%. 58% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Bay Area Community Land Trust

Support and develop low-income affordable cooperative housing.

Housing & Shelter

Northern California Land Trust

NCLT is dedicated to creating and preserving affordable housing for people with low to moderate incomes.

—

San Francisco Community Land Trust

To create permanent, affordable, resident-controlled housing for low to moderate income people in san francisco through community ownership of land.

Environment

Homes for California

Homes for Sonoma is a nonprofit developer creating quality workforce housing options that support safe and sustainable community, and finds efficient, scalable solutions to address the housing crisis in Sonoma County and throughout…

Housing & Shelter

Sacramento Neighborhood Housing

To improve and restore district-wide neighborhoods for the benefit of the residents.

Housing & Shelter

Central California Land Trust

The Central California Land Trust will create and preserve housing in Fresno, stewarding community ownership, and ensuring permanent affordability, long-term stability, and access to wealth-building in neighborhoods historically torn apart…

Housing & Shelter

California Housing Partner Corporation

The California Housing Partnership Corporation creates and preserves affordable and sustainable homes for Californians with low incomes by providing expert financial and policy solutions to nonprofit and public partners.

Unclassified

California Council of Land Trusts

To conserve California's extraordinary land and water resources through a strong network of land trusts with one cohesive voice across urban and rural communities.

Environment

California Yimby

California YIMBYs mission is to ensure that California is an affordable place to live, work, and raise a family. We advance our mission by:A.)addressing and correcting systemic inequities in California housing laws, and in related laws and…

Housing & Shelter

Housing Rights Committee of

The Housing Rights Committee of San Francisco is dedicated to combating the displacement crisis gripping our city by building the power of working-class tenants of color to take on the real estate industry and win housing justice for all.…

Education

Solano Affordable Housing Foundation

Housing & Shelter

San Francisco Housing Action Coalition

Promote public understanding of policies supporting the creation of well-designed, well-located housing at all levels of affordability for residents of the Bay Area, California.

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fideicomiso Comunitario Tierra Libre and the most unlike its peers is Solano Advocates for Victims. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 12 years old; the field is 13. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 13% of your grantees by number, and just 20% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 6% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

2/31

the rest of the field

13%

12,096/95,951

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

25 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

24/25

Grantees still filing

22/25

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$395,006Community Improvement$192,038Housing & Shelter$155,899Environment$91,513Education$40,000Philanthropy$30,000Crime & Legal$30,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Possibility LabsCA28.6× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Possibility Labs · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · The California Endowment · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · The Kresge Foundation · Enterprise Community Partners Inc · East Bay Community Foundation · Tides Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Oakland Community Land Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation COMMUNITY VISION CAPITAL & CONSULTING funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

04Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: SACRAMENTO COMMUNITY LAND TRUST.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~13 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 5 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

5 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 6.2× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 824955956 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on SACRAMENTO COMMUNITY LAND TRUST, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 13 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 15% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Community Vision Capital & Consulting?

Find your warmest path to Community Vision Capital & Consulting through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

COMMUNITY VISION CAPITAL & CONSULTING

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

25 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Community Vision Capital & Consulting?

More from the funding graph

COMMUNITY VISION CAPITAL & CONSULTING

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

25 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Community Vision Capital & Consulting?

More from the funding graph