Skip to content
Community Hospital Health Services Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Community Hospital Health Services Foundation

To preserve reproductive services, to promote health and wellness and to advocate for quality healthcare through grant making and education.

$569k
Granted FY2025still arriving
27
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$87k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$1.8MFood & Nutrition$370kYouth Development$314kHousing & Shelter$229kHuman Services$202kCrime & Legal$163kEducation$143kRecreation & Sports$47kOther$0
02FY2025 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 27 grants below total $432,225, the rows itemized in this filing. The $569,442 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $137,217 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $57k
  • $10k–50k17 grants · $232k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $143k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$28M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ROCKING HORSE CENTER$87,000
CLARK COUNTY COMBINED HEALTH DISTRICT$56,000
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK$31,800
SPRINGFIELD CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT$18,500
CLARK COUNTY LITERACY COALITION$15,500
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$15,000
PREGNANCY RESOURCE CLINIC$15,000
BRAXTON MILLER FOUNDATION$13,500
JEFFERSON STREET OASIS$13,500
SPRINGFIELD PROMISE NEIGHBORHOOD$13,500
ST VINCENT DE PAUL$13,000
HOPE$13,000
ON-THE-RISE$10,000
CITILOOKOUT COUNSELING CENTER$10,000
MERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $289k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SHOES 4 THE SHOELESS: $10k → 14%CHAMPAIGN FAMILY YMCA: $8k → 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS MIAMI VALLEY CHAPTER: $8k → 14%CHAMPAIGN FAMILY YMCA: $7k → 10%catholic charities: $10k → 16%CHAMPAIGN FAMILY YMCA: $5k → 10%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $8k → 16%PROJECT WOMAN: $30k → 15%CITILOOKOUT COUNSELING CENTER: $25k → 15%CITILOOKOUT COUNSELING CENTER: $25k → 15%PROJECT WOMAN: $18k → 15%PROJECT WOMAN: $11k → 15%PROJECT WOMAN: $10k → 15%CITILOOKOUT COUNSELING CENTER: $10k → 15%project woman: $9k → 15%PROJECT WOMAN: $9k → 15%PROJECT WOMAN: $8k → 15%PROJECT WOMAN: $8k → 15%PROJECT WOMAN: $8k → 15%CITILOOKOUT COUNSELING CENTER: $6k → 15%FAMILY AND YOUTH INITIATIVES: $8k → 15%FAMILY AND YOUTH INITIATIVES: $8k → 15%PRECIOUS GIFTS DAYCARE AND LEARNING CENTER: $11k → 15%good samaritan outreach center of springfield: $6k → 15%ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $15k → 15%ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $13k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.2M · 42 repeat orgs$167k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +20% since the first grant, against +0% for those funded once.

42 repeat relationships: 24 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

42
21

Total granted

$3.2M
$154k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+0%

Still filing today

86%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentEducationFood & NutritionPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RH
    ROCKING HORSE CHILDREN'S HEALTH CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $821k · revenue +105%
  • CC
    CLARK COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATION
    7× · 2019–2025 · $496k · revenue +241% · 71% of their budget
  • SH
    SHARED HARVEST FOODBANK INC
    4× · 2019–2022 · $152k · revenue +116%

Funded once

  • SI
    SPRINGFIELD INITIATIVE
    one grant, 2021 · $12k
  • SC
    Springfield City Schools
    one grant, 2019 · $11k
  • PG
    PRECIOUS GIFTS DAY CARE & LEARNING CENTER
    one grant, 2021 · $11k · revenue -57%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Improvement Corporation of Springfield-Clark County

Economic development of springfield and clark county ohio.

Community Improvement
2
Springvale Health Centers Inc

Provide high quality integrated healthcare services to consumers and agencies primarily in tuscarawas and carroll counties.

Health
3
Community Shelter Board

The community shelter board is ending homelessness by creating collaborations, innovating solutions, and investing in quality programs.

—
4
Empowering and Strengthening Ohio's People Inc

Empowering and strengthening ohio's people (esop) helps adults in all stages of life achieve and maintain financial wellness and housing stability.

Housing & Shelter
5
Springwell Inc

Springwell helps individuals improve their quality of life and reduce their need for residential care by helping them access community resources. springwell works with individuals directly as well as with government agencies, health…

Human Services
6
Clermont Counseling Center

To ensure people with mental illness, addiction, and related challenges lead healthy and productive lives.

Health
7
Lutheran Social Services of Central Ohio Delaware Housing Inc

See schedule oto create a better world by serving people in need by operating food pantries, homeless shelters, a domestic violence shelter, affordable housing communities, senior living, assisted living and skilled care facilities, a home…

—
8
Clark Community Mental Health Center

Reduce the stigma and promote awareness surrounding mental health within the communities we serve, promote wellness, and provide individualized care with an integrated approach.

Health
9
The Women's Clinic of Columbus

Women's health clinic focusing on helping at-risk parents deal with issues related to prenancy and parenting.

Health
10
School Choice Ohio Inc

The mission of school choice ohio is to protect and expand children's educational options through ensuring choice in quality schools and other places of learning, thereby supporting systemic reform of k-12 education across the state.

Education
11
Circle Health Services

Circle Health fights for equity by healing, teaching, and inspiring individuals and families to reach their full potential.

—
12
Ohio Hills Health Services

Ohio hills health services is a non-profit health care operation, organized by communities in eastern ohio to promote healthy lifestyles and to provide preventative and comprehensive medical and dental care for area residents. the primary…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Springfield City Youth Mission; the most unlike its peers is The Arthur Morgan Institute for Community Solutions. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

54 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 54 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
52/54
Grantees still filing
35/54
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ROCKING HORSE CHILDREN'S HEALTH CENTER: $821,150 · HealthROCKING HORSE CHILDREN'S HEALTH CENTERCLARK COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $496,200 · HealthCLARK COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATIONPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHWEST OHIO REGION: $107,250 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHWEST OHIO REGIONPREGNANCY RESOURCE CLINIC OF CLARK COUNTY INC: $103,750 · HealthPREGNANCY RESOURCE CLINIC OF CLARK COUNTY INC+6 more: $72,280 · HealthSHARED HARVEST FOODBANK INC: $152,250 · OtherSHARED HARVEST FOODBANK INCSHELTERED INC: $94,250 · OtherSHELTERED INCWELLSPRING: $65,100 · OtherWELLSPRINGSPRINGFIELD SCHOOL DISTRICT: $59,500 · OtherSPRINGFIELD SCHOOL DISTRICTBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SPRINGFIELD INC: $56,250 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF…COMMUNITY MERCY FOUNDATION: $31,000 · OtherTHE UNITED WAY OF CLARK CHAMPAIGN & MADISON COUNTIES INC: $40,730 · OtherTHE BRAXTON MILLER FOUNDATION: $35,500 · OtherHELPING OUR YOUNG PEOPLE CONNECT WITH GOD: $47,000 · OtherHELPING OUR YOUNG PEOPLE CO…+21 more: $249,474 · Other+21 morePROJECT WOMAN OF SPRINGFIELD & CLARK COUNTY: $108,639 · Human ServicesPROJECT W…CITILOOKOUT: $65,500 · Human ServicesCITILOOKO…DISTRICT COUNCIL OF SPRINGFIELD OHIO SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $28,000 · Human ServicesDISTRICT …CHAMPAIGN FAMILY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN A: $19,500 · Human ServicesCHAMPAIGN…Catholic Charities Southwestern Ohio: $17,500 · Human ServicesCatholic …FAMILY AND YOUTH INITIATIVES: $15,000 · Human ServicesPRECIOUS GIFTS DAY CARE & LEARNING CENTER: $10,500 · Human ServicesSHOES 4 THE SHOELESS INC: $10,000 · Human Services+2 more: $14,000 · Human ServicesON-THE-RISE: $82,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRLS ON THE RUN OF DAYTON: $44,250 · Youth DevelopmentSPRINGFIELD CITY YOUTH MISSION: $36,500 · Youth DevelopmentGirl Scouts of Western Ohio: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentRULING OUR EXPERIENCES INC: $11,775 · Youth Development+1 more: $6,000 · Youth DevelopmentOHIO TRI COUNTY FOOD ALLIANCE DBA SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $82,800 · Food & NutritionJEFFERSON STREET OASIS COMMUNITY GARDEN: $47,500 · Food & NutritionCHILDREN'S HUNGER ALLIANCE: $25,000 · Food & NutritionLIFECARE ALLIANCE: $22,500 · Food & NutritionASPIRE P16 COLLABORATIVE: $62,200 · EducationCLARK STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $37,650 · EducationCLARK COUNTY LITERACY COALITION: $34,500 · EducationCRAYONS TO CLASSROOMS: $5,000 · Education1159 SOUTH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $90,000 · Community ImprovementNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING PARTNERSHIP OF GREATER SPRINGFIELD: $39,500 · Community Improvement
Health$1,600,630Other$831,054Human Services$288,639Youth Development$205,525Food & Nutrition$177,800Education$139,350Community Improvement$129,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetROCKING HORSE CHILDREN'S HEALTH CENTER: $821,150 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetCLARK COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $496,200 over 7y, 71% of budgetSHARED HARVEST FOODBANK INC: $152,250 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetPROJECT WOMAN OF SPRINGFIELD & CLARK COUNTY: $108,639 over 9y, 1.8% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHWEST OHIO REGION: $107,250 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetPREGNANCY RESOURCE CLINIC OF CLARK COUNTY INC: $103,750 over 9y, 3.4% of budgetSHELTERED INC: $94,250 over 6y, 0.7% of budget1159 SOUTH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $90,000 over 3y, 16% of budgetOHIO TRI COUNTY FOOD ALLIANCE DBA SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $82,800 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetON-THE-RISE: $82,000 over 9y, 5.7% of budgetCITILOOKOUT: $65,500 over 4y, 4.1% of budgetWELLSPRING: $65,100 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetASPIRE P16 COLLABORATIVE: $62,200 over 7y, 3.4% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SPRINGFIELD INC: $56,250 over 6y, 25% of budgetJEFFERSON STREET OASIS COMMUNITY GARDEN: $47,500 over 5y, 19% of budgetHELPING OUR YOUNG PEOPLE CONNECT WITH GOD: $47,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetGIRLS ON THE RUN OF DAYTON: $44,250 over 5y, 7.1% of budgetTHE UNITED WAY OF CLARK CHAMPAIGN & MADISON COUNTIES INC: $40,730 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING PARTNERSHIP OF GREATER SPRINGFIELD: $39,500 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetMCKINLEY HALL INC: $39,400 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCLARK STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $37,650 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetSPRINGFIELD CITY YOUTH MISSION: $36,500 over 6y, 3.4% of budgetTHE BRAXTON MILLER FOUNDATION: $35,500 over 3y, 8.9% of budgetCLARK COUNTY LITERACY COALITION: $34,500 over 4y, 3.6% of budgetDISTRICT COUNCIL OF SPRINGFIELD OHIO SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $28,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetELDERLY UNITED OF SPRINGFIELD & CLARK COUNTY OHIO INC: $27,120 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S HUNGER ALLIANCE: $25,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGirl Scouts of Western Ohio: $25,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLIFECARE ALLIANCE: $22,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetOESTERLEN - SERVICES FOR YOUTH FOUNDATION INC: $21,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCHAMPAIGN FAMILY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN A: $19,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCatholic Charities Southwestern Ohio: $17,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $16,800 over 2y, 20% of budgetSIFI MINISTRY dba SAFE HARBOR HOUSE: $15,000 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetADVOCATES FOR BASIC LEGAL EQUALITY INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY AND YOUTH INITIATIVES: $15,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetRULING OUR EXPERIENCES INC: $11,775 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPRECIOUS GIFTS DAY CARE & LEARNING CENTER: $10,500 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetSHOES 4 THE SHOELESS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetSPRINGFIELD MUSEUM OF ART: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHE ARTHUR MORGAN INSTITUTE FOR COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS: $8,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHER STORY INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetEPISCOPAL RETIREMENT SERVICES: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRECOVERY ZONE: $7,500 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetNAMI National: $6,380 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGood Samaritan Outreach Center: $6,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetAUTUMN TRAILS STABLE: $6,000 over 1y, 6.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Springfield Found…The United Way of Cla…Della Selsor Tr UwDayton Foundation Dep…Harry and Violet Turn…Wilson Sheehan Founda…The Dayton FoundationCrabill Family Founda…Assurant FoundationCarleton F and Ruth T…Springfield Eagles Ch…The Nehemiah Foundati…
The Springfield FoundationOH86.3× affinity39 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Springfield Foundation · The United Way of Clark Champaign & Madison Counties Inc · Della Selsor Tr Uw · Dayton Foundation Depository · Harry and Violet Turner 95 Charitable Trust · Wilson Sheehan Foundation · The Dayton Foundation · Crabill Family Foundation · Assurant Foundation · Carleton F and Ruth T Davidson Trust · Springfield Eagles Charity Inc · The Nehemiah Foundation of Springfield/Clark County

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Community Hospital Health Services Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Community Hospital Health Services Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    21report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 66 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Community Hospital Health Services’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home