Skip to content
Community Health Network Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Community Health Network Inc

Community health network, inc.

$5.9M
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$4.8M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$31MEducation$7.2MHuman Services$791kCommunity Improvement$445kYouth Development$260kPhilanthropy$175kFood & Nutrition$159kCrime & Legal$125kOther$0
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 17 grants below total $5,397,170, the rows itemized in this filing. The $5,877,118 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $479,948 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k16 grants · $629k
  • $250k+1 grant · $4.8M
$45,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.0B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY HEALTH NETWORK FOUNDATION$4,768,621
MINORITY HEALTH COALITION OF MADISON COUNTY$45,000
THE GILEAD HOUSE$45,000
THE IMMIGRANT WELCOME CENTER INC$45,000
HORIZON HOUSE INC$45,000
JOHN H BONER COMMUNITY CENTER$45,000
LIFESMART YOUTH$45,000
SOUTHEAST COMMUNITY SERVICES$45,000
SHEPHERD COMMUNITY INC$45,000
WESTMINSTER NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES INC$45,000
SEKHEM INSTITUTE FOR HOLISTIC HEALING IN$45,000
GLEANERS FOOD BANK OF INDIANA$45,000
OPERATION LOVE MINISTRIES INC$40,000
STILL WATERS ADULT DAY CENTER$36,488
SAMARITAN CAREGIVERS INC$27,061
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $525k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%TURNING POINT SOC: $45k → 15%THE GILEAD HOUSE: $45k → 15%TURNING POINT SOC: $45k → 15%LUTHERAN CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES OF INKY INC: $45k → 16%THE GILEAD HOUSE: $45k → 15%KOKOMO RESCUE MISSION: $20k → 15%LUTHERAN CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES OF INKY INC: $45k → 16%YMCA OF GREATER INDIANAPOLIS: $45k → 16%WESTMINSTER NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES INC: $45k → 16%SHEPHERD COMMUNITY INC: $45k → 16%WESTMINSTER NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES INC: $45k → 16%YMCA OF GREATER INDIANAPOLIS: $15k → 16%COVERING KIDS AND FAMILIES OF INDIANA: $10k → 16%COVERING KIDS AND FAMILIES OF INDIANA: $10k → 16%COVERING KIDS AND FAMILIES OF INDIANA: $10k → 16%COVERING KIDS AND FAMILIES OF INDIANA: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$33M · 23 repeat orgs$7.7M to everyone else

23 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
17

Total granted

$33M
$7.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
+14%

Still filing today

100%
76%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $201k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationCrime & LegalPublic BenefitYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    COMMUNITY HEALTH NETWORK FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $29M · revenue +128% · 31% of their budget
  • JP
    JANE PAULEY COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $1.0M · revenue +116%
  • GI
    Greater Indianapolis Chamber of Commerce Inc
    3× · 2019–2021 · $300k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • IT
    IVY TECH FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $6.9M · revenue +4%
  • CF
    CENTER FOR LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT INC
    one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue -50%
  • CT
    CATHEDRAL TRUSTEES INC
    one grant, 2019 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
2
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
3
Indiana University Health West Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
4
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
5
Southern Indiana Community Health Care

To provide high-quality, comprehensive, community-sensitive health care utilizing christ-oriented principles. rooted in our faith-driven values, sichc serves as a pillar for accessible, comprehensive care of the whole person and a catalyst…

Health
6
Indiana University Health Frankfort Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
7
Indiana University Health Bedford Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
8
Indiana University Health Jay Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
9
Indiana University Health Care Associates Inc

To deliver preeminent medical care and service to our patients and communities through outstanding and innovative medical leadership and practice, while participating in and supporting excellence in education and research. We achieve this…

Health
10
Indiana University Health White Memorial Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
11
Union Hospital Inc

We exist to serve our patients with compassionate health care of the highest quality.

Health
12
Indiana University Health Foundation Inc

Indiana university health foundation leverages the power of philanthropy to support the iu health goal of making indiana one of the healthiest states in the nation.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Covering Kids & Families of Indiana Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Ross Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
40/40
Grantees still filing
25/40
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMMUNITY HEALTH NETWORK FOUNDATION INC: $28,642,123 · HealthCOMMUNITY HEALTH NETWORK FOUNDATION INC+9 more: $1,472,114 · HealthIVY TECH FOUNDATION INC: $6,900,000 · EducationIVY TECH FOUNDATION …+4 more: $215,000 · EducationGreater Indianapolis Chamber of Commerce Inc: $300,000 · OtherGLEANERS FOOD BANK OF INDIANA INC: $158,500 · OtherSOUTHEAST COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $135,000 · OtherOPERATION LOVE MINISTRIES INC: $95,000 · OtherJOHN H BONER COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $90,000 · OtherCATHEDRAL TRUSTEES INC: $50,000 · OtherSEKHEM INSTITUTE FOR HOLISTIC HEALING: $45,000 · OtherHORIZON HOUSE INC: $45,000 · OtherTHE IMMIGRANT WELCOME CENTER INC: $90,000 · OtherTHE ROSS FOUNDATION: $45,000 · Other+7 more: $162,738 · OtherIHA HOSPITAL ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC: $908,997 · Public BenefitCENTER FOR LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT INC: $100,000 · Public BenefitLUTHERAN CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES OF IN/KY INC: $90,000 · Human ServicesGilead House: $90,000 · Human ServicesWESTMINSTER NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES INC: $90,000 · Human ServicesTURNING POINT - SYSTEMS OF CARE: $90,000 · Human ServicesYoung Men's Christian Association of Greater Indianapolis: $60,000 · Human ServicesShepherd Community Inc: $45,000 · Human ServicesCOVERING KIDS & FAMILIES OF INDIANA INC: $40,000 · Human ServicesKOKOMO RESCUE MISSION INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL INDIANA INC: $175,000 · PhilanthropyPACE INC: $90,000 · Crime & LegalINDIANA COALITION TO END SEXUAL ASSAULT INC: $25,000 · Crime & LegalBONA VISTA PROGRAMS INC: $10,000 · Crime & Legal
Health$30,114,237Education$7,115,000Other$1,216,238Public Benefit$1,008,997Human Services$525,000Philanthropy$175,000Crime & Legal$125,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH NETWORK FOUNDATION INC: $28,642,123 over 8y, 31% of budgetIVY TECH FOUNDATION INC: $6,900,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetJANE PAULEY COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $1,000,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetIHA HOSPITAL ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC: $908,997 over 4y, 31% of budgetGreater Indianapolis Chamber of Commerce Inc: $300,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL INDIANA INC: $175,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGLEANERS FOOD BANK OF INDIANA INC: $158,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHEAST COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $135,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetMINORITY HEALTH COALITION OF MADISON COUNTY: $135,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetCENTER FOR LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT INC: $100,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetOPERATION LOVE MINISTRIES INC: $95,000 over 3y, 4.1% of budgetLUTHERAN CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES OF IN/KY INC: $90,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetSOCIAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF INDIANA INC: $90,000 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetTHE IMMIGRANT WELCOME CENTER INC: $90,000 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetJOHN H BONER COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $90,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetGilead House: $90,000 over 2y, 8.6% of budgetWESTMINSTER NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES INC: $90,000 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetTURNING POINT - SYSTEMS OF CARE: $90,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetCENTER OF WELLNESS FOR URBAN WOMEN INC: $90,000 over 2y, 7.0% of budgetPACE INC: $90,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetMarian University: $80,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of Greater Indianapolis: $60,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetIndiana Chamber of Commerce Foundation Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetTHE ROSS FOUNDATION: $45,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetWarren Arts and Education Foundation Inc: $45,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetCANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY INDIANA: $45,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetLITTLE RED DOOR CANCER AGENCY INC: $45,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetShepherd Community Inc: $45,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHORIZON HOUSE INC: $45,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSAMARITAN CAREGIVERS INC: $43,614 over 2y, 9.2% of budgetButler University: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOVERING KIDS & FAMILIES OF INDIANA INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetINDIANA COALITION TO END SEXUAL ASSAULT INC: $25,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetKOKOMO RESCUE MISSION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY HOSPITAL ANDERSON FOUNDATION INC: $17,500 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetALTERNATIVES INCORPORATED OF MADISON COUNTY: $16,250 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCICP FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBONA VISTA PROGRAMS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MILK BANK INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Central Indiana Commu…The Indianapolis Foun…United Way of Central…Lilly Endowment IncThe Brave Heart Found…Nicholas H Noyes Jr M…Hamilton County Commu…Second Helpings IncMaurer Family Foundat…Richard M Fairbanks F…Duke Energy FoundationCommunity Foundation …
Central Indiana Community Foundation IncIN42.2× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · The Indianapolis Foundation Inc · United Way of Central Indiana Inc · Lilly Endowment Inc · The Brave Heart Foundation Inc · Nicholas H Noyes Jr Memorial Foundation · Hamilton County Community Foundation Inc · Second Helpings Inc · Maurer Family Foundation Inc · Richard M Fairbanks Foundation Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · Community Foundation of Howard County

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Community Health Network Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Community Health Network Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    19report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Community Health Network’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home