Skip to content
Community Health & Education Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Community Health & Education Foundation

To raise funds to promote and improve health and education in local communities.

$1.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$151k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$1.1MHuman Services$495kFood & Nutrition$480kCommunity Improvement$345kReligion$289kHousing & Shelter$202kPhilanthropy$186kHealth$107kOther$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $322k
  • $50k–250k12 grants · $1.0M
$45,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Agape Villages Foster Family Agency$150,540
Pacific Chamber Orchestra$105,200
Livermore Valley Performing Arts Ce$90,500
Livermore Valley Opera$90,000
Tri Valley Nonprofit Alliance$84,543
Culinary Angels$80,159
Quest Science Center$75,625
Tri Valley Haven$75,000
Partners for Change$68,750
Individual grant recipient$68,750
Livermore Music$67,299
Pedrozzi Foundation$51,125
Granada MUsic Parents$45,000
Fertile Groundworkds$45,000
SS Parent Express$43,380
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $526k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Agape Villages Foster Family Agency: $151k → 9%Agape Villages Foster Family Agency: $30k → 9%Hively: $15k → 10%HIVELY: $9k → 10%HIVELY: $7k → 10%Goodness Village: $112k → 10%SPECTRUM COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $31k → 10%CITY SERVE OF THE TRI-VALLEY: $31k → 10%Monthly Miracles: $30k → 10%MONTHLY MIRACLES: $15k → 10%Monthly Miracles: $15k → 10%PARTNERS FOR CHANGE: $30k → 10%Partners for Change: $30k → 10%ENJOY LIFE MORE: $21k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.5M · 25 repeat orgs$1.3M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +29% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

25 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
26

Total granted

$2.5M
$953k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+18%

Still filing today

72%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $347k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationFood & NutritionHealthAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TN
    TRI-VALLEY NONPROFIT ALLIANCE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $345k · revenue +784%
  • FG
    Fertile GroundWorks
    6× · 2020–2025 · $212k · revenue +25% · 29% of their budget
  • LM
    Livermore Music
    6× · 2020–2025 · $146k · revenue +14% · 52% of their budget

Funded once

  • LV
    LIVERMORE VALLEY PERFORMING ARTS CENTER
    2× · 2020–2021 · $206k · revenue +10%
  • CO
    CHABAD OF THE TRI VALLEY
    2× · 2020–2021 · $122k
  • GV
    GOODNESS VILLAGE
    one grant, 2024 · $112k · revenue -15%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Vallejo Symphony Assoc

To present performances of symphonic music of the highest possible artistic excellance for the cityzens of vallejo and solano county; to cultivate and nurture the apperciation and enjoyment of classical music in people of all ages; and to…

—
2
Winchester Orchestra of San Jose

The mission of the Winchester Orchestra is to experience and share the joy of playing orchestral music with the people of San Jose in a friendly and enjoyable concert atmosphere.

Arts & Culture
3
San Bernardino Valley Concert Association
—
4
San Jose Chamber Orchestra

The mission of the San Jose Chamber Orchestra (SJCO) is to share exciting, though-provoking, and vibrant Music by contemporary and time-honored composers reflecting the cultural diversity of our everchanging community, and to support and…

Unclassified
5
Santa Clara Valley Performing Arts Association

Maintain chamber orchestra and operatic company for the presentation of symphonic music and opera

Arts & Culture
6
Diablo Symphony Association Dba Diablo Symphony Orchestra

Organize, manage, and support the Diablo Symphony.

Arts & Culture
7
San Lorenzo Valley Mountain Community Theater
Arts & Culture
8
Vivo Youth Orchestras

Vivo is a youth development program that helps students from underserved commmunities nurture safe relationships, develop mastery in music, and build community while being empowered to thrive and succeed in life.

Arts & Culture
9
Solano Winds

Performing arts

Arts & Culture
10
Voices of Silicon Valley

Community Music / Arts Organization

Arts & Culture
11
South Valley Symphony Association Inc

South Valley Symphony is a non-profit, volunteer community orchestra,dedicated to providing orchestral opportunities for local musicians, educational support/mentoring to students in music programs in South Bay school districts and…

Arts & Culture
12
San Jose Chamber Music Society

To present chamber music concerts in San Jose performed by top ensembles from the Bay Area, across America, and around the world. To enrich our audience experience through post-concert Q&As, program notes, and meet-the-composer…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Senior Support Program of the Tri-Valley; the most unlike its peers is Mario Pedrozzi Scholarship Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

7
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/34
Grantees still filing
23/34
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Livermore Valley Performing Arts Ce: $181,000 · OtherLivermore Valley Performing Arts CePartners for Change: $129,900 · OtherPartners for ChangeCHABAD OF THE TRI VALLEY: $122,304 · OtherCHABAD OF THE TRI VALLEYTri Valley Haven: $75,000 · OtherTri Valley HavenVINEYARD CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP OF PLEASANTON: $70,509 · OtherVINEYARD CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP OF PLEA…Individual grant recipient: $68,750 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLIVERMORE HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETIC FUND: $64,550 · OtherTRI-VALLEY INTERFAITH FELLOWSHIP: $55,697 · OtherHOLY CROSS LUTHERAN CHURCH: $46,379 · Other+26 more: $428,530 · Other+26 moreLIVERMORE VALLEY PERFORMING ARTS CENTER: $205,980 · Arts & CultureLIVERMORE VALLEY PERFO…SS PARENT EXPRESS: $135,431 · Arts & CultureSS PARENT EXPRESSPACIFIC CHAMBER ORCHESTRA: $120,200 · Arts & CulturePACIFIC CHAMBER ORCHES…GRANADA MUSIC PARENTS: $96,180 · Arts & CultureGRANADA MUSIC PARENTSLivermore Valley Opera: $90,000 · Arts & CultureLivermore Valley OperaVALLEY CONCERT CHORALE: $74,619 · Arts & CultureVALLEY CONCERT CHORALERoyal Theater Academy Inc: $31,400 · Arts & CultureTRI-VALLEY NONPROFIT ALLIANCE: $344,891 · EducationTRI-VALLEY NONPR…Livermore Music: $145,555 · EducationLivermore MusicMario Pedrozzi Scholarship Foundation: $56,375 · EducationMario Pedrozzi S…Agape Villages Inc: $180,540 · Human ServicesAgape Villages …GOODNESS VILLAGE: $111,933 · Human ServicesGOODNESS VILLAG…PARTNERS FOR CHANGE TRI-VALLEY: $60,290 · Human ServicesPARTNERS FOR CH…MONTHLY MIRACLES: $60,000 · Human ServicesMONTHLY MIRACLE…Enjoy Life More Inc: $51,650 · Human ServicesEnjoy Life More…HIVELY: $30,963 · Human ServicesHIVELYSPECTRUM COMMUNITY SERVICES: $30,500 · Human ServicesSPECTRUM COMMUN…Fertile GroundWorks: $211,511 · Food & NutritionFertile Ground…Culinary Angels: $136,972 · Food & NutritionCulinary Angel…OPEN HEART KITCHEN OF LIVERMORE INC: $131,450 · Food & NutritionOPEN HEART KIT…SUNFLOWER HILL: $42,669 · HealthAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $40,395 · HealthAXIS COMMUNITY HEALTH INC: $38,000 · HealthQUEST SCIENCE CENTER: $90,625 · Science & Tech
Other$1,242,619Arts & Culture$753,810Education$546,821Human Services$525,876Food & Nutrition$479,933Health$121,064Science & Tech$90,625

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTRI-VALLEY NONPROFIT ALLIANCE: $344,891 over 6y, 16% of budgetFertile GroundWorks: $211,511 over 6y, 29% of budgetLIVERMORE VALLEY PERFORMING ARTS CENTER: $205,980 over 2y, 6.1% of budgetAgape Villages Inc: $180,540 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetLivermore Music: $145,555 over 6y, 52% of budgetCulinary Angels: $136,972 over 6y, 17% of budgetOPEN HEART KITCHEN OF LIVERMORE INC: $131,450 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetPACIFIC CHAMBER ORCHESTRA: $120,200 over 2y, 32% of budgetGOODNESS VILLAGE: $111,933 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetGRANADA MUSIC PARENTS: $96,180 over 6y, 45% of budgetQUEST SCIENCE CENTER: $90,625 over 2y, 11% of budgetLivermore Valley Opera: $90,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetVALLEY CONCERT CHORALE: $74,619 over 4y, 54% of budgetPARTNERS FOR CHANGE TRI-VALLEY: $60,290 over 3y, 40% of budgetMONTHLY MIRACLES: $60,000 over 3y, 6.6% of budgetMario Pedrozzi Scholarship Foundation: $56,375 over 3y, 7.0% of budgetEnjoy Life More Inc: $51,650 over 2y, 5.7% of budgetSUNFLOWER HILL: $42,669 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $40,395 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAXIS COMMUNITY HEALTH INC: $38,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetALLIES PALS CAT RESCUE: $34,025 over 4y, 19% of budgetRoyal Theater Academy Inc: $31,400 over 1y, 8.9% of budgetPaws In Need: $31,010 over 1y, 11% of budgetHIVELY: $30,963 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTri-Valley Haven For Women: $30,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSPECTRUM COMMUNITY SERVICES: $30,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSENIOR SUPPORT PROGRAM OF THE TRI-VALLEY: $30,500 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetLIVERMORE AREA RECREATION AND PARK DISTRICT FOUNDATION LARPD FOUNDATION: $20,150 over 1y, 29% of budgetSANDRA J WING HEALING THERAPIES FOUNDATION: $16,400 over 2y, 6.5% of budgetLIVERMORE-AMADOR SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION: $10,163 over 2y, 8.4% of budgetWEST COAST SOCCER CLUB: $8,750 over 2y, 1.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rotarian Foundation o…Three Valleys Communi…Fremont Bank Foundati…San Jose Mercury News…East Bay Community Fo…Kaiser Foundation Hos…Summit Financial Foun…Workday FoundationChamberlin Family Phi…Tri-Valley Nonprofit …Rotary Club of Pleasa…Livermore Valley Wine…
Rotarian Foundation of LivermoreCA28.5× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rotarian Foundation of Livermore · Three Valleys Community Foundation · Fremont Bank Foundation · San Jose Mercury News Wish Book Fund Inc · East Bay Community Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Summit Financial Foundation · Workday Foundation · Chamberlin Family Philanthropy · Tri-Valley Nonprofit Alliance · Rotary Club of Pleasanton North Foundati · Livermore Valley Winegrowers Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Community Health & Education Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Community Health & Education Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Community Health & Education Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Community Health & Education Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Community Health & Education’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home