Skip to content
Community Fund Management Foundation Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Community Fund Management Foundation Inc

Community fund management foundation, inc.

$651k
Granted FY2024still arriving
24
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$27k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$558kHuman Services$450kHousing & Shelter$189kEmployment$142kRecreation & Sports$115kArts & Culture$99kEducation$50kFood & Nutrition$46kOther$0
02FY2024 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 24 grants below total $324,830, the rows itemized in this filing. The $651,160 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $326,330 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k19 grants · $285k
$10,065
Median grant
2
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOUTHEASTERN OHIO CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING INC$27,370
CAL RIPKEN SR FOUNDATION$20,000
NORTH COAST COMMUNITY HOMES$20,000
PLAYHOUSE SQUARE FOUNDATION$20,000
MOUNT ALOYSIUS CORP$20,000
UCO INDUSTRIES INC$20,000
THE TREEHOUSE OHIO$19,500
LIFECARE ALLIANCE$16,000
TOLEDO ZOO & AQUARIUM$15,740
WASCO INC$14,500
THE ARC OF OHIO$12,000
ACHIEVEMENT CENTERS FOR CHILDREN$10,065
ADULT GUARDIANSHIP SERVICES OF SUMMIT$10,000
HOPE HOMES FOUNDATION$10,000
INTEGRATED COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $604k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 80% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GOOD WORKS FARM INC: $20k → 6%MERCER RESIDENTIAL SERVICES INC: $20k → 8%SOUTHEASTERN OHIO CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING INC: $27k → 9%LUTHER HOME OF MERCY: $20k → 10%BUCKEYE VALLEY FAMILY YMCA: $10k → 10%ST JOHN'S VILLA: $15k → 12%HEINZERLING COMMUNITY: $20k → 13%THE ARC OF ALLEN COUNTY: $20k → 13%RESIDENT HOME ASSOCIATION (RHA) OF GREATER DAYTON INC: $13k → 14%ECHOING HILLS VILLAGE: $10k → 15%MOUNT ALOYSIUS CORP: $20k → 16%GOLDEN STRING INC: $8k → 19%INTEGRATED COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS: $10k → 7%MERCER RESIDENTIAL SERVICES INC: $8k → 8%TOWARD INDEPENDENCE: $4k → 9%THE ARC OF ALLEN COUNTY: $20k → 13%CHOICES IN COMMUNITY LIVING INC: $15k → 14%SERVICE FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING INC: $12k → 17%GOLDEN STRING INC: $8k → 19%HOPE HOMES FOUNDATION: $10k → 13%KEN ANDERSON ALLIANCE: $20k → 16%HELP FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%ZANE'S INC: $5k → 13%CHOICES IN COMMUNITY LIVING: $9k → 14%STEPPING STONES: $20k → 16%STEPPING STONES: $4k → 16%HELP FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 17%ADULT GUARDIANSHIP SERVICES OF SUMMIT: $10k → 13%PRO SENIORS INC: $24k → 16%ENVISION: $10k → 16%FAMILY HAVEN INC: $9k → 17%CINCINNATI ASSOCIATION OF THE BLIND & VISUALLY IMPAIRED: $10k → 16%NEW AVENUES TO INDEPENDENCE INC: $10k → 17%HEINZERLING COMMUNITY: $4k → 15%NEW AVENUES TO INDEPENDENCE: $10k → 17%NEW AVENUES TO INDEPENDENCE: $9k → 17%FARE-CLE COMMUNITY FUND: $22k → 17%FARE-CLE COMMUNITY FUND: $8k → 17%BIKUR CHOLIM OF CLEVELAND: $10k → 17%ROSE-MARY CENTER: $13k → 17%BIKUR CHOLIM OF CLEVELAND: $10k → 17%REC2CONNECT: $10k → 17%NORTH COAST COMMUNITY HOMES: $20k → 17%KOINONIA HOMES: $20k → 17%CLEVELAND SIGHT CENTER: $20k → 17%BLOSSOM HILL INC: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 5% of Community Fund Management Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 99% of the giving stays in OH; by stated purpose, 94%.

Community Fund Management Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 4.5% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

33%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$573k · 23 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +24% since the first grant, against +21% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 19 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
65

Total granted

$573k
$896k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+21%

Still filing today

96%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 11% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $288k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureEmploymentHousing & ShelterEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    CLEVELAND HEARING AND SPEECH CENTER
    3× · 2019–2023 · $49k · revenue +24%
  • TA
    THE ARC OF OHIO INC
    2× · 2020–2024 · $42k · revenue +186%
  • TA
    THE ARC OF ALLEN COUNTY
    2× · 2020–2022 · $40k · revenue +118%

Funded once

  • PB
    Peace by Piece Cleveland
    one grant, 2020 · $30k · revenue 0%
  • PS
    Pro Seniors Incgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $24k · revenue +124%
  • KA
    KEN ANDERSON ALLIANCE
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue -2%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arc Group Employment Services

To provide employment opportunities to central ohioans with developmental disabilities.

Employment
2
Autism Services Inc

To provide cost-effective residential, social, intellectual, physical and vocational services to individuals with autism in group homes and in home support.

—
3
The Arc of the Mid Ohio Valley Inc

Mission is to promote and advocate for the welfare of people with intellectual and other developmental disabilities.

—
4
Residential Home for the Developmentally Disabled Inc

Built on a foundation of compassion and integrity, rhdd is dedicated to supporting individuals with a disability, to live and work in their communities.safe in a family environment, individuals are empowered to achieve personal and…

—
5
Residential Services Inc

Residential Services, Inc. provides living options and related supports to people with intellectual and developmental disabilities of all ages.

Health
6
Cincinnati's Optimum Residential Environments Inc

Residential & Habilitative Svs. Provide residential and habilitative services to adults with developmental disabilities

Health
7
Community Residences Inc

Housing and programs for persons with intellectual disabilities.

Human Services
8
Aspire Inc

We empower adults with disabilities to lead fulfilling lives. We are committed to creating a community where all people are valued and accepted.

Employment
9
The Arc of the Capital Area

We empower central texans with intellectual and developmental disabilities and their families through compassionate case management and innovative programs.

—
10
Greene Arc Inc

Provider of vocational, residential, day support, mental health and advocacy for individuals with disabilities.

Human Services
11
Connections for Life

Empowering people with disabilities by providing services that promote independence, equality and intergration, enhancing their quality of life.

Health
12
Options Family of Services

Improve disabled persons quality of life.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Help Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Yesh Tikvah. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

105 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 105 of the 108 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
19
Early backer (in before they grew)
98/105
Grantees still filing
69/105
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE ARC OF ALLEN COUNTY: $40,000 · Human ServicesTHE ARC OF ALLEN COUNTYFARE-CLE COMMUNITY FUND INC: $29,509 · Human ServicesNEW AVENUES TO INDEPENDENCE INC: $29,044 · Human ServicesMERCER RESIDENTIAL SERVICES INC: $27,532 · Human ServicesSOUTHEASTERN OHIO CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING: $27,370 · Human ServicesCHOICES IN COMMUNITY LIVING INC: $24,000 · Human ServicesSTEPPING STONES INC: $23,796 · Human ServicesHEINZERLING COMMUNITY: $23,542 · Human ServicesPro Seniors Inc: $23,534 · Human Services+26 more: $355,976 · Human Services+26 moreCLEVELAND HEARING AND SPEECH CENTER: $48,664 · OtherCLEVELAND HEARING AND SPEECH CENTERTHE ARC OF OHIO INC: $42,000 · OtherTHE ARC OF OHIO INCEASTER SEALS NORTHERN OHIO INC: $22,066 · OtherCOMMUNITY COMPUTER ALLIANCE: $20,000 · OtherU-CO INDUSTRIES INC: $20,000 · OtherSUNSHINE COMMUNITIES: $20,000 · OtherFLAT ROCK HOMES INC: $20,000 · OtherUNITED DISABILITY SERVICES INC: $20,000 · OtherTHE GREATER CLEVELAND BEEPBALL LEAGUE: $20,000 · OtherBITTERSWEET INC: $20,000 · OtherPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA BUCKEYE CHAPTER INC: $20,000 · OtherYesh Tikvah: $20,000 · OtherLAWRENCE SCHOOL: $20,000 · OtherNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN - CLEVELAND: $20,000 · OtherADAPTIVE SPORTS PROGRAM OF OHIO: $20,000 · Other+22 more: $219,887 · Other+22 morePeace by Piece Cleveland: $30,000 · HealthPeace by Piece Cl…UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY ASSOCIATION OF GREATER CLEVELAND INC: $29,947 · HealthUNITED CEREBRAL P…AUTISM SOCIETY OF GREATER AKRON: $20,000 · HealthAUTISM SOCIETY OF…Deaf Services Center Inc: $20,000 · HealthDeaf Services Cen…COURAGEOUS COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $20,000 · HealthCOURAGEOUS COMMUN…CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $20,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPIT…BRAIN INJURY ASSOCIATION OF OHIO IN: $20,000 · HealthBRAIN INJURY ASSO…THE ALS ASSOCIATION NORTHERN OHIO CHAPTER: $20,000 · HealthTHE ALS ASSOCIATI…OhioGuidestone: $20,000 · HealthOhioGuidestoneTHE TREEHOUSE OHIO: $19,500 · HealthTHE TREEHOUSE OHI…PLAN OF SOUTHWEST OHIO INC: $15,000 · HealthPLAN OF SOUTHWEST…MILESTONES AUTISM RESOURCES: $12,400 · HealthAUTISM CONNECTIONS: $10,240 · Health+2 more: $10,103 · HealthFRENCH CREEK FOUNDATION: $20,000 · Arts & CultureVisionaries and Voices: $20,000 · Arts & CulturePlayhouse Square Foundation: $20,000 · Arts & CultureArt Sparks: $15,000 · Arts & CultureHOLMES CENTER FOR THE ARTS LTD: $10,568 · Arts & CultureVALLEY ART CENTER INC: $9,000 · Arts & CultureTHE CLEVELAND MUSIC SCHOOL SETTLEMENT: $7,200 · Arts & CultureLINKING EMPLOYMENT ABILITIES AND POTENTIAL: $20,000 · EmploymentGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF CENTRAL OHIO INC: $15,020 · EmploymentSandco Industries: $13,800 · EmploymentFIRST CAPITAL ENTERPRISES INC: $13,052 · EmploymentINNOVATIVE OPPORTUNITIES: $10,500 · EmploymentBELCO WORKS INC: $10,000 · EmploymentNewbridge Place: $24,800 · Housing & ShelterPEOPLE WORKING COOPERATIVELY INC: $20,000 · Housing & ShelterSUMMIT HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP: $20,000 · Housing & ShelterSOLON COMMUNITY LIVING INC: $15,155 · Housing & ShelterCAL RIPKEN SR FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · EducationLINDEN GROVE SCHOOL: $10,113 · EducationBOUNDLESS STRATEGIC RESOURCES INC: $10,000 · EducationCLI INCORPORATED: $7,500 · Education
Human Services$604,303Other$572,617Health$267,190Arts & Culture$101,768Employment$82,372Housing & Shelter$79,955Education$47,613

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCLEVELAND HEARING AND SPEECH CENTER: $48,664 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetTHE ARC OF OHIO INC: $42,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetTHE ARC OF ALLEN COUNTY: $40,000 over 2y, 5.3% of budgetPeace by Piece Cleveland: $30,000 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetUNITED CEREBRAL PALSY ASSOCIATION OF GREATER CLEVELAND INC: $29,947 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNEW AVENUES TO INDEPENDENCE INC: $29,044 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMERCER RESIDENTIAL SERVICES INC: $27,532 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetSOUTHEASTERN OHIO CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING: $27,370 over 1y, 8.6% of budgetNewbridge Place: $24,800 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetCHOICES IN COMMUNITY LIVING INC: $24,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSTEPPING STONES INC: $23,796 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetHEINZERLING COMMUNITY: $23,542 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPro Seniors Inc: $23,534 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetEASTER SEALS NORTHERN OHIO INC: $22,066 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetKEN ANDERSON ALLIANCE: $20,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetAUTISM SOCIETY OF GREATER AKRON: $20,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetDeaf Services Center Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetADAPTIVE SPORTS PROGRAM OF OHIO: $20,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetFRENCH CREEK FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 26% of budgetCOURAGEOUS COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $20,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetBIKUR CHOLIM OF CLEVELAND: $20,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY COMPUTER ALLIANCE: $20,000 over 1y, 8.1% of budgetVisionaries and Voices: $20,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetBRAIN INJURY ASSOCIATION OF OHIO IN: $20,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetLINKING EMPLOYMENT ABILITIES AND POTENTIAL: $20,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetHELP FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPlayhouse Square Foundation: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetU-CO INDUSTRIES INC: $20,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetCAL RIPKEN SR FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH COAST COMMUNITY HOMES INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE ALS ASSOCIATION NORTHERN OHIO CHAPTER: $20,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetCLEVELAND SOCIETY FOR THE BLIND: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSUNSHINE COMMUNITIES: $20,000 over 1y, 8.0% of budgetPEOPLE WORKING COOPERATIVELY INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetKOINONIA HOMES INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFLAT ROCK HOMES INC: $20,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetUNITED DISABILITY SERVICES INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGood Works Farm Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetBITTERSWEET INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA BUCKEYE CHAPTER INC: $20,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetLAWRENCE SCHOOL: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSUMMIT HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP: $20,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetOhioGuidestone: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNT ALOYSIUS CORP: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLUTHER HOME OF MERCY FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN - CLEVELAND: $20,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE TREEHOUSE OHIO: $19,500 over 1y, 18% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Good Shepherd Fdn of …The Cleveland Foundat…Akron Community Found…Gpd Group Employees F…The Louise H & David …Higley Fund of the Cl…Community West Founda…Robert H Reakirt Fdn …The Swagelok Foundati…The Helen F & Louis S…Firstenergy FoundationThe Sk Wellman Founda…
Good Shepherd Fdn of OhioNJ49.2× affinity21 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Good Shepherd Fdn of Ohio · The Cleveland Foundation · Akron Community Foundation · Gpd Group Employees Foundation Inc · The Louise H & David S Ingalls Fdn · Higley Fund of the Cleveland Foundation · Community West Foundation · Robert H Reakirt Fdn Equities · The Swagelok Foundation · The Helen F & Louis Stolier Family Foundation · Firstenergy Foundation · The Sk Wellman Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Community Fund Management Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Community Fund Management Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Cal Ripken Sr Foundation Inc: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
37report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Community Fund Management Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Community Fund Management Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 108 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Community Fund Management’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home