Skip to content
Community Foundation Partnership Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Community foundation

Community Foundation Partnership Inc

To improve the quality of life by providing philanthropic leadership and building permanent endowments that enable donors to make lasting investments in lawrence and martin counties.

$1.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
39
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$210k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$3.7MPublic Benefit$984kReligion$723kRecreation & Sports$356kArts & Culture$263kYouth Development$254kCommunity Improvement$151kFood & Nutrition$150kOther$0
02FY2024 · 39 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 39 grants below total $1,059,471, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,502,095 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $442,624 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k11 grants · $72k
  • $10k–50k23 grants · $428k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $559k
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$33M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SHOALS PUBLIC LIBRARY$210,012
SHOALS COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION$129,048
LOOGOOTEE METHODIST CHURCH$83,415
SHOALS UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$82,162
NORTH LAWRENCE COMMUNITY SCHOOLS$54,274
MARTIN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY$32,974
GOODWILL CEMETERY ASSOCIATION$31,554
LOOGOOTEE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT LADIES AUXILLARY$30,000
RADIUS INDIANA$25,000
HOOSIER UPLANDS DEVELOPEMNT CORPORATION$24,697
ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY$24,295
LOOGOOTEE COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION$24,019
CITY OF LOOGOOTEE$20,142
MARTIN COUNTY TREASURER$20,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF LAWRENCE COUNTY$19,990
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–23, $62k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%SOUTHERN INDIANA CENTER (SIAGS): $32k → 12%SOUTHERN INDIANA CENTER: $8k → 12%SOLUTIONS CENTER: $6k → 12%LAW COUNTY CANCER PATIENTS SERVICES: $8k → 12%LAWRENCE COUNTY CANCER PATIENT SERV: $8k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.6M · 52 repeat orgs$692k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +21% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

52 repeat relationships: 30 still active in FY2024, 22 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

52
33

Total granted

$6.6M
$607k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+15%

Still filing today

38%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $85k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationCommunity ImprovementHealthFood & NutritionPublic Safety & DisasterHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BN
    BEDFORD NORTH LAWRENCE SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2017–2022 · $122k · revenue +88%
  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF LAWRENCE CO
    4× · 2021–2024 · $82k · revenue +26%
  • HU
    HOOSIER UPLANDS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
    5× · 2017–2024 · $74k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • MT
    MARSHALL TOWNSHIP TRUSTEE
    one grant, 2022 · $128k
  • LP
    LOOGOOTEE PICKLEBALL
    one grant, 2023 · $65k
  • SC
    STONE CITY ALLIANCE FOR RECOVERY & HOPE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $56k · revenue +26%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lawrence County Industrial Development Council

To promote business development within lawrence county, illinois.

—
2
Washington Township Volunteer Fire Department of Starke County Indiana

Volunteer fire department

—
3
Indiana University Health Morgan Inc
—
4
Indiana Agribusiness Council Inc

An agribusiness network advocate, representing members' interests within all levels of government and keeping members informed of the latest industry trends and news.

—
5
Raleigh Fire Department Inc

Provide fire and EMS services to all or part of 5 townships in Rush Co. IN

—
6
Martin County Senior Citizens Housing Inc

Provide housing for senior citizens of Martin County Indiana

—
7
Starke County Historical Society

Preserve history of starke county indiana

—
8
East Central Indiana (Eci) Regional

Rgional vision, providing collaborative leadership and professional services to develop effective solutions and maximize economic

Philanthropy
9
United Way of Indiana County

The mission of the united way of indiana county is to meet critical needs and improve the quality of life throughout indiana county by inspiring and uniting its residents.

Philanthropy
10
Hoosier Outreach Inc the Hoosier Outreach Project
—
11
Meals On Wheels Association of Howard County Indiana Inc

Meals on Wheels of Howard County focuses on providing affordable or free meals to the shut-ins or medically recuperating residents of Howard County, Indiana. Meals on Wheels provides hot and cold meals that are healthy and affordable.…

—
12
Starke County Humane Society Inc

Animal shelter

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hoosier Uplands Economic Development Corporation; the most unlike its peers is Hope Resource Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 93 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
37/37
Grantees still filing
21/37
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OPERATING GRANTS5000: $1,484,422 · OtherOPERATING GRANTS5000VARIOUS AVAILABLE UPON REQ 5000: $785,230 · OtherVARIOUS AVAILABLE UPON REQ 5000CITY OF LOOGOOTEE: $601,700 · OtherCITY OF LOOGOOTEELOOGOOTEE METHODIST CHURCH: $292,071 · OtherSHOALS PUBLIC LIBRARY: $283,421 · OtherSHOALS UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $244,958 · OtherTOWN OF SHOALS: $244,163 · Other+70 more: $2,687,405 · Other+70 moreBEDFORD NORTH LAWRENCE SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC: $122,246 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN INDIANA FOUNDATION INC: $19,843 · EducationMUSIC BOOSTER CLUB OF BEDFORD NORTH LAWRENCE: $16,283 · EducationLAWRENCE COUNTY 4-H CLUBS & FAIR ASSOCIATION INC: $7,000 · EducationHOOSIER UPLANDS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $74,138 · Community ImprovementMARTIN COUNTY ALLIANCE FOR ECONOMIC GROWTH INC: $30,500 · Community ImprovementLAWRENCE COUNTY ECONOMIC GROWTH COUNCIL INC: $27,025 · Community ImprovementRADIUS INDIANA INC: $25,000 · Community ImprovementBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF LAWRENCE CO: $82,005 · Youth DevelopmentTRUSTEES OF PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $28,113 · Youth DevelopmentHOOSIER HILLS FOOD BANK INC: $58,500 · Food & NutritionBERTHA'S MISSION INC: $40,798 · Food & NutritionSOUTHERN INDIANA CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING INC: $45,709 · Human ServicesLAWRENCE COUNTY CANCER PATIENT SERVICES INC: $15,845 · Human ServicesSHAWSWICK VOLUNTEER FIRE FIGHTERS ASSOCIATION INC: $30,922 · Public Safety & DisasterPERRY TOWNSHIP VOLUNTEER FIRE-EMS INC: $24,820 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$6,623,370Education$165,372Community Improvement$156,663Youth Development$110,118Food & Nutrition$99,298Human Services$61,554Public Safety & Disaster$55,742

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBEDFORD NORTH LAWRENCE SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC: $122,246 over 5y, 11% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF LAWRENCE CO: $82,005 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetHOOSIER UPLANDS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $74,138 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHOOSIER HILLS FOOD BANK INC: $58,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetSTONE CITY ALLIANCE FOR RECOVERY & HOPE INC: $56,280 over 1y, 21% of budgetDISTRICT OF WASHINGTON OF THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DEPAUL INC: $51,151 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetLAWRENCE COUNTY HISTORICAL & GENEALOGICAL SOCIETY INC: $46,019 over 5y, 8.4% of budgetSOUTHERN INDIANA CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING INC: $45,709 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetCatholic Charities Bloomington Inc: $42,826 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetBERTHA'S MISSION INC: $40,798 over 4y, 10% of budgetMARTIN COUNTY 4-H COUNCIL CLUB FUND INC: $39,641 over 4y, 5.3% of budgetSHAWSWICK VOLUNTEER FIRE FIGHTERS ASSOCIATION INC: $30,922 over 3y, 14% of budgetMARTIN COUNTY ALLIANCE FOR ECONOMIC GROWTH INC: $30,500 over 2y, 8.4% of budgetLAWRENCE INTERFAITH ENDEAVOR INC: $27,411 over 3y, 7.0% of budgetLAWRENCE COUNTY ECONOMIC GROWTH COUNCIL INC: $27,025 over 2y, 5.7% of budgetRADIUS INDIANA INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUnited Way of Lawrence County Inc: $24,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetWHITE RIVER HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $22,623 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN INDIANA FOUNDATION INC: $19,843 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMUSIC BOOSTER CLUB OF BEDFORD NORTH LAWRENCE: $16,283 over 2y, 13% of budgetLAWRENCE COUNTY CANCER PATIENT SERVICES INC: $15,845 over 2y, 9.5% of budgetMartin County Council On Aging Inc: $15,553 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetBehind the Wire Ministries Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetYOUTH FIRST: $11,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetINDIAN CREEK TOWNSHIP VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPTMENT INC: $10,803 over 1y, 10% of budgetMARTIN COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $10,500 over 1y, 7.9% of budgetIndiana University Health Foundation Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAWRENCE COUNTY 4-H CLUBS & FAIR ASSOCIATION INC: $7,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetINDIANA SPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $7,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPRISONER AND COMMUNITY TOGETHER PACT INC: $6,569 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOOSIER TRAILS COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $6,461 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGREEN HILL CEMETERY ASSN: $6,300 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetMARTIN COUNTY CANCER PATIENT SERVICES: $5,500 over 1y, 10% of budgetHOPE RESOURCE CENTER INC: $5,241 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF SOUTH CENTRAL INDIANA: $5,065 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BEDFORD NORTH LAWRENCE SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF LAWRENCE CO ↗
  • Who funds HOOSIER UPLANDS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds HOOSIER HILLS FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds STONE CITY ALLIANCE FOR RECOVERY & HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON OF THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DEPAUL INC ↗
  • Who funds LAWRENCE COUNTY HISTORICAL & GENEALOGICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN INDIANA CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds Catholic Charities Bloomington Inc ↗
  • Who funds BERTHA'S MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds MARTIN COUNTY 4-H COUNCIL CLUB FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds SHAWSWICK VOLUNTEER FIRE FIGHTERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hoosier Uplands Econo…The Smithville Charit…Lilly Endowment IncRegional Opportunity …United Way of South C…University of Indiana…Duke Energy FoundationCenterpoint Energy Fo…Central Indiana Commu…Community Foundation …United Way of Lawrenc…Cicp Foundation Inc
Hoosier Uplands Economic Development CorporationIN45× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hoosier Uplands Economic Development Corporation · The Smithville Charitable Foundation Inc · Lilly Endowment Inc · Regional Opportunity Initiatives Inc · United Way of South Central Indiana · University of Indianapolis · Duke Energy Foundation · Centerpoint Energy Foundation Inc · Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · Community Foundation Alliance Inc · United Way of Lawrence County Inc · Cicp Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Community Foundation Partnership Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Community Foundation Partnership Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 93 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Community Foundation Partnership’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home