· Community foundation
Community Foundation of Chippewa Co
To enable donors to achieve their philanthropic goals, to meet changing community needs, thereby benefiting the communities, people and other nonprofit organizations of chippewa county.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 34 grants below total $479,485 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $680,939 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $201,454 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k24 grants · $169k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $187k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $123k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHIPPEWA FALLS PARKS REC FORESTRY | $71,814 |
| MCDONELL AREA CATHOLIC SCHOOLS | $51,198 |
| CHIPPEWA FALLS AREA UNIFIED SCHOOL | $43,968 |
| FAMILY HEALTH CENTER - MARSHFIELD | $34,160 |
| MCDONELL HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION | $27,835 |
| DOVE HEALTHCARE COMMUNITY FOUNDATIO | $25,000 |
| CHIPPEWA COUNTY HUMANE ASSOCIATION | $24,269 |
| CHIPPEWA FALLS MUSIC ASSOCIATION | $11,815 |
| FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF CHIPPE | $10,313 |
| KIDS FOOD BASKET | $10,000 |
| ST CHARLES BORROMEO CATHOLIC CHURCH | $9,977 |
| YMCA OF THE CHIPPEWA VALLEY | $9,389 |
| CHIPPEWA VALLEY HEALTH COOPERATIVE | $9,166 |
| CHIPPEWA COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY | $9,089 |
| OUR NAWAKWA INC | $8,652 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $127k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 5% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 12% of Community Foundation of Chippewa Co’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 99% of the giving stays in WI; read by stated purpose it is 95% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
27 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $103k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MHMCDONELL HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC9× · 2017–2025 · $223k · revenue +191%
- CCCHIPPEWA COUNTY HUMANE ASSOCIATION9× · 2017–2025 · $168k · revenue +79%
- CFCHIPPEWA FALLS AREA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDATION INC7× · 2017–2025 · $85k · revenue +203%
Funded once
- MCMARSHFIELD CLINIC INCone grant, 2022 · $17k · revenue -11%
- SJSt Joseph's Hospital of the Hospital Sisters of the Third Order of St Franc isone grant, 2022 · $17k · revenue -92%
- DMDR MOON MEMORIAL LIBRARYone grant, 2022 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The organization was formed for the purpose of providing access to quality health care for uninsured residents of chippewa, luce and mackinac counties of michigan by coordinating health care providers.
To facilitate, coordinate and promote safe, nurturing, home-like care for residents placed for foster care and for any other charitable and educational purposes related to promoting well-being of children in foster care.
To enable donors to achieve their philanthropic goals, to meet changing community needs, thereby benefiting the communities, people and other nonprofit organizations of chippewa county.
To protect and restore central michigan's land, water, and wildlife resources to improve the quality of life for all.
To provide primary health care to residents of the greater se iowa region, especially those individuals/families with limited resources or with other barriers to health care. see schedule o for additional information.
Advocate for and support families who are homeless in our community by providing temporary housing and support services, and by fostering independence.
To improve health through the work of community health centers and their partners.
Advance the highest quality of home and community-based care.
Educational child care
We improve lives and build stronger chippewa valley communities by bringing resources together to advance the common good.
To protect and preserve natural and scenic land in chippewa county and the surrounding area.
To share christ's love as we serve the spiritual, physical, intellectual and emotional needs of people entrusted to our care and others whose lives we touch.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chippewa Valley Health Clinic Inc and the most unlike its peers is Chippewa Falls Music Association Ltd. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 11% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MCDONELL HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CHIPPEWA COUNTY HUMANE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds CHIPPEWA FALLS AREA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CHIPPEWA COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds FIRST UNITED PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH ↗
- Who funds CHIPPEWA FALLS MUSIC ASSOCIATION LTD ↗
- Who funds Hospital Sisters of St Francis Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE GREATER CHIPPEWA VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY HEALTH CENTER OF MARSHFIELD INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER ↗
- Who funds CHIPPEWA VALLEY CULTURAL ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds FEED MY PEOPLE INC ↗
- Who funds CHIPPEWA FALLS AREA SENIOR CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds HOPE VILLAGE - TINY HOUSING ALTERNATIVES INC ↗
- Who funds THE OPEN DOOR CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds DOVE HEALTHCARE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE CHIPPEWA VALLEY ↗
- Who funds LE PHILLIPS CAREER DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF WISCONSIN AND UPPER MICHIGAN INC ↗
- Who funds AGNES TABLE AND COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds PROFESSIONAL DENTAL HYGIENE EXPRESS INC ↗
- Who funds CHIPPEWA VALLEY HEALTH CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds MARSHFIELD CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds St Joseph's Hospital of the Hospital Sisters of the Third Order of St Franc is ↗
- Who funds SLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC ↗
- Who funds LITERACY CHIPPEWA VALLEY ↗
- Who funds KIDS' FOOD BASKET INC ↗
- Who funds Chippewa Valley Health Cooperative ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF D R MOON PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
- Who funds OUR NAWAKWA INC ↗
- Who funds VERITAS CLASSICAL ACADEMY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Edward and Hannah M Rutledge Charities Inc · United Way of the Greater Chippewa Valley Inc · Eau Claire Community Foundation · Mayo Clinic Group Return · Otto Bremer Trust · The Jamf Nation Global Foundation · Rcu Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Ba Mason Trust · Xcel Energy Foundation · The Nordson Corporation Foundation · The Casper Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Community Foundation of Chippewa Co funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.