Skip to content
Community Education Group Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Community Education Group Inc

Education, creation, and expansion of programs and specialized projects addressing health, socio-economic, environmental, and systemic changes and disparties facing people of color and other vulnerable communities.

$21k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $16,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $20,818 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $4,318 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTH CAROLINA AIDS ACTION NETWORK$10,000
VIRGINIA RURAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION$6,500
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $80k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS: $50k → 21%THE HEALING HOUSE INC: $30k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Southwest Virginia Community Health Systems Inc

Provide comprehensive primary medical care to the communities served.

Health
2
Warren-Vance Community Health Center Inc

The clinic provides primary healthcare in a spirit of compassion to limited income persons who are without adequate health insurance benefits in warren and vance counties, north carolina.

Health
3
Neighborhood Health

To improve health and advance health equity in alexandria, arlington, and fairfax by providing high quality primary care regardless of ability to pay.

Health
4
Caring Hearts Free Clinic of Patrick County Inc

To provide free, non-judgmental, quality healthcare to those in need by using a solid base of culturally diverse community resources.

Health
5
Free Clinic of Central Virginia Inc

The primary exempt purpose of the free clinic of central virginia, inc. is to provide free medical, dental, and pharmaceutical care to indigent persons.

Health
6
Healthpoint Family Care Inc

To be the best provider of health services through compassion, innovation and excellence.

Health
7
West Virginia Local Health Inc

Strengthening public health agencies and the broader public health and health care systems in west virginia.

Health
8
Peninsula Institute for Community Health

Providing medical and dental care to indigent patients.

Health
9
Health Access Inc

Health access, inc. is a nonprofit community health care facility, organized as a charitable free clinic, that provides primary medical care and prescription medications to uninsured, low income, adults in a two county area of north…

Health
10
Tri-County Health Clinic

To provide a free health clinic and other similar services for relief of the poor, the distressed, or the underprivileged.

Health
11
Mountaineer Community Health Center

To provide primary medical care service in a rural community.

Health
12
Community Care of West Virginia Inc

The mission of ccwv is to help our communities live the healthiest lives possible by meeting their immediate and long-term healthcare needs. this mission is accomplished by providing high quality, accessible, comprehensive, culturally…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is West Virginia Health Right Inc; the most unlike its peers is Healing House. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/15
Grantees still filing
7/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMMUNITY EDUCATION GROUP INC: $250,000 · HealthCOMMUNITY EDUCATION GROUP INCMILAN PUSKAR HEALTH RIGHT INC: $170,000 · HealthMILAN PUSKAR HEALTH RIGHT INCBECKLEY HEALTH RIGHT INC: $50,000 · HealthBECKLEY HEALTH RIGHT INCSHENANDOAH VALLEY MEDICAL SYSTEM I: $50,000 · HealthSHENANDOAH VALLEY MEDICAL SYSTEM IGOOD SAMARITAN FREE CLINIC INC: $38,000 · HealthGOOD SAMARITAN FREE CLINIC INC+3 more: $26,500 · HealthWEST VIRGINIA HEALTH RIGHT INC: $170,000 · OtherWEST VIRGINIA HEALTH RIGHT INCBERKELEY COUNTY SCHOOLS: $50,000 · OtherBERKELEY COUNTY SCHOOLSCOVENANT HOUSE INC: $50,000 · OtherCOVENANT HOUSE INCWHEELING HEALTH RIGHT: $50,000 · OtherWHEELING HEALTH RIGHTANCHOR MEDICAL LLC: $50,000 · OtherANCHOR MEDICAL LLCCABELL COUNTY EMERGENCY MEDICAL DEPARTMENT: $50,000 · OtherCABELL COUNTY EMERGENCY MEDICAL DEPARTMENTJEFFERSON COUNTY COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INC: $50,000 · OtherJEFFERSON COUNTY COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INCCABELL-HUNTINGTON HEALTH DEPARTMENT: $30,000 · OtherCABELL-HUNTINGTON HEALTH DEPARTMENT+1 more: $6,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY CONNECTIONS INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesHEALING HOUSE: $30,000 · Human ServicesBRIGHT FUTURES NOW INC: $40,000 · Community ImprovementDALLAS PRIDE: $10,732 · Civil Rights
Health$584,500Other$506,000Human Services$80,000Community Improvement$40,000Civil Rights$10,732

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY EDUCATION GROUP INC: $250,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA HEALTH RIGHT INC: $170,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMILAN PUSKAR HEALTH RIGHT INC: $170,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE INC: $50,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetCOMMUNITY CONNECTIONS INC: $50,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetBECKLEY HEALTH RIGHT INC: $50,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetSHENANDOAH VALLEY MEDICAL SYSTEM I: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJEFFERSON COUNTY COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INC: $50,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetBRIGHT FUTURES NOW INC: $40,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetGOOD SAMARITAN FREE CLINIC INC: $38,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetHEALING HOUSE: $30,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetDALLAS PRIDE: $10,732 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetNorth Carolina Aids Action Network: $10,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetUS HELPING US PEOPLE INTO LIVING INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetVa Rural Health Association: $6,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Eastern West Virginia…The Greater Kanawha V…United Way of the Eas…Bowles Rice FoundationMilan Puskar Foundati…Truist West Virginia …Encova Foundation of …West Virginia Univers…Direct ReliefAmazonsmile Foundation
Eastern West Virginia Community FoundationWV15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Eastern West Virginia Community Foundation · The Greater Kanawha Valley Foundation · United Way of the Eastern Panhandle · Bowles Rice Foundation · Milan Puskar Foundation Inc · Truist West Virginia Foundation Inc · Encova Foundation of West Virginia · West Virginia University Research Corporation · Direct Relief · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Community Education Group Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Community Education Group Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Community Education Group Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Community Education Group Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Community Education Group’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home