Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Community Economic Development Association of Michigan

The COMMUNITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION OF MICHIGAN (cedam) supports its diverse membership to create vibrant, sustainable and resilient communities.

$1.9M
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$550k
Largest
01What you fund
0189% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20182025.

Community Improvement$1.2MPhilanthropy$969kHuman Services$407kEmployment$196kHousing & Shelter$51kPublic Safety & Disaster$50kOther$372k
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 23 grants below total $1,721,840 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,931,342 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $209,502 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $252k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $885k
  • $250k+1 grant · $550k
$38,704
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ACCOUNTING AID SOCIETY$550,017
GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF CENTRAL MICHIGAN'S HEARTLAND$145,603
UNITED WAY OF SOUTH CENTRAL MICHIGAN$126,501
HEART OF WEST MICHIGAN UNITED WAY$125,039
NORTHWEST MICHIGAN COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY$116,000
WAYNE METROPOLITAN COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY$92,519
UNITED WAY OF MARQUETTE COUNTY$92,065
COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY$87,058
UNITED WAY FOR SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN$50,000
SOUTHWEST ORGANIZATIONS UNIFYING RESOURCES FOR OUR COMMUNITIES AND EMPLOYER$50,000
DEVOTA ADVOCACY SERVICES$45,000
MACOMB COUNTY VETERAN SERVICES$38,704
BARRY COUNTY UNITED WAY$35,677
GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF WEST MICHIGAN$35,000
MID MICHIGAN COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY$34,581
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $407k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 41% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 12%NORTHWEST MICHIGAN COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $116k → 9%NORTHWEST MICHIGAN COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC: $111k → 10%COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $87k → 13%NORTHWEST MICHIGAN COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $12k → 10%COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $68k → 13%COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $11k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.5M · 12 repeat orgs$556k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of -18% since the first grant, against -22% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
4

Total granted

$2.5M
$124k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-18%
-22%

Still filing today

75%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $432k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’22’23’24’25
PhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesEmploymentHousing & ShelterPublic Safety & DisasterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Accounting Aid Society
    4× · 2022–2025 · $952k · revenue +32%
  • UNITED WAY OF SOUTH CENTRAL MICHIGAN
    3× · 2022–2025 · $315k · revenue +119%
  • Wayne-Metropolitan Community Action Agency Inc
    3× · 2022–2025 · $263k · revenue -64%

Funded once

  • Michigan Association of United Ways Inc
    one grant, 2018 · $62k · revenue -88%
  • CA
    COMMUNITY ACTION HOUSE
    one grant, 2024 · $27k · revenue +21%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF GENESEE COUNTY
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue -22%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Way of Greater Central Michigan

United way provides leadership and resources to improve the quality of life in our community by generating revenue, creating awareness and engaging volunteers.

2
United Way of Southwest Michigan

United way of southwest michigan works in berrien, cass, and van buren counties to sustain a united community where everyone contributes, belongs, and thrives.

Philanthropy
3
Area Agency On Aging of Western Michigan Inc

Through internal expertise, external partnerships, and advocacy, the area agency on aging of western michigan provides older adults, adults with disabilities, and their caregivers equitable access to services that promote independence and…

Human Services
4
United Way of the Midlands

United way of the midlands mission is "we unite our community's caring spirit to build a stronger tomorrow".

Philanthropy
5
United Way Manitowoc County Inc

United way's mission is to improve lives.

Philanthropy
6
United Way of Wayne and Holmes Co

In order to mobilize community resources to help people measurably improve their lives - we work collaboratively with our community to identify priorities, and then decide which strategies, dollars, and partnerships should be used to bring…

Philanthropy
7
United Way of the Midlands

United way connects people and resources to improve the quality of life in the midlands. united way invests in a broad range of community programs that increase access to health care, improve student success, assist people in crisis to…

Philanthropy
8
United Way of the Greater Chippewa Valley Inc

We improve lives and build stronger chippewa valley communities by bringing resources together to advance the common good.

Philanthropy
9
Michigan State Afl-Cio Workforce Development Institute

To apply the principles of workforce development to grow michigan's economy while improving the lives of michigan workers.

Employment
10
Cedar Valley United Way

Uniting our community to empower individuals and families to thrive.

Philanthropy
11
United Way of Greater Lima Inc

United Way improves lives by uniting the caring power of our community.

12
United Way of East Central Iowa

Unite the caring power of communities to invest in effective solutions to improve people's lives.

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northwest Michigan Community Action and the most unlike its peers is Devota Advocacy Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 55 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%4%<5yr14%8%5–10yr19%0%10–20yr16%15%20–35yr14%23%35–55yr16%50%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%2%<5yr14%1%5–10yr19%0%10–20yr16%7%20–35yr14%41%35–55yr16%51%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/29
the rest of the field
14%
3,213/22,663

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
10/24
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Accounting Aid Society — $952,354 · Community ImprovementAccounting Aid SocietyWayne-Metropolitan Community Action Agency Inc — $263,105 · Community ImprovementWayne-Metropolitan Community Action Agency…UNITED WAY OF SOUTH CENTRAL MICHIGAN — $314,700 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF SOUTH CENTRAL MICHI…HEART OF WEST MICHIGAN UNITED WAY — $256,250 · PhilanthropyHEART OF WEST MICHIGAN UNITED WAYBARRY COUNTY UNITED WAY — $71,677 · PhilanthropyBARRY COUNTY UNITED WAYLAPEER COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $64,893 · PhilanthropyLAPEER COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATIO…Michigan Association of United Ways Inc — $62,000 · PhilanthropyMichigan Association of United Wa…COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR MUSKEGON COUNTY — $50,000 · PhilanthropyFremont Area Community Foundation — $50,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF LAPEER COUNTY — $41,685 · Philanthropy+3 more — $57,773 · Philanthropy+3 moreNORTHWEST MICHIGAN COMMUNITY ACTION — $239,893 · Human ServicesNORTHWEST MICH…COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY — $166,947 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY ACTI…UNITED WAY OF MARQUETTE COUNTY — $92,065 · OtherUNITED WAY O…Macomb Community Action — $87,277 · OtherMacomb Commu…CITY OF LANSING — $58,645 · OtherCITY OF LANS…MID MICHIGAN COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC — $40,467 · OtherMID MICHIGAN…GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF WEST MICHIGAN INC — $35,000 · OtherGOODWILL IND…COMMUNITY ACTION HOUSE — $26,776 · OtherCOMMUNITY AC…+3 more — $31,371 · Other+3 moreGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF CENTRAL MICHIGAN'S HEARTLAND INC — $145,603 · EmploymentSOUTHWEST ORGANIZATIONS UNIFYING RESOURCES FOR OUR COMMUNITY AND EMPLOYEE — $50,000 · EmploymentDevota Advocacy Services — $45,000 · Housing & ShelterALTERNATIVES FOR GIRLS — $5,709 · Housing & ShelterUNITED WAY FOR SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN — $50,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Community Improvement$1,215,459Philanthropy$968,978Human Services$406,840Other$371,601Employment$195,603Housing & Shelter$50,709Public Safety & Disaster$50,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAccounting Aid Society — $952,354 over 4y, 12% of budgetUNITED WAY OF SOUTH CENTRAL MICHIGAN — $314,700 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetWayne-Metropolitan Community Action Agency Inc — $263,105 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHEART OF WEST MICHIGAN UNITED WAY — $256,250 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetNORTHWEST MICHIGAN COMMUNITY ACTION — $239,893 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY — $166,947 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF CENTRAL MICHIGAN'S HEARTLAND INC — $145,603 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetUNITED WAY OF MARQUETTE COUNTY — $92,065 over 1y, 18% of budgetBARRY COUNTY UNITED WAY — $71,677 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetLAPEER COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $64,893 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetMichigan Association of United Ways Inc — $62,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR MUSKEGON COUNTY — $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFremont Area Community Foundation — $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDevota Advocacy Services — $45,000 over 1y, 38% of budgetUNITED WAY OF LAPEER COUNTY — $41,685 over 2y, 7.3% of budgetMID MICHIGAN COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC — $40,467 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION HOUSE — $26,776 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GENESEE COUNTY — $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMICHIGAN GATEWAY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $14,699 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetALTERNATIVES FOR GIRLS — $5,709 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Consumers Energy FoundationMI29.2× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Consumers Energy Foundation · Dte Energy Foundation · WK Kellogg Foundation · Flagstar Foundation Inc · Michigan Health Endowment Fund · United Way for Southeastern Michigan · Heart of West Michigan United Way · Tr Ua Fifth Third Foundation · Comerica Charitable Foundation · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Michigan Community Action Inc · Council of Michigan Foundations

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Community Economic Development Association of Michigan funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph