Skip to content

· Public charity

Community Chest South Shore

To provide financial support to agencies within the Five Towns community.

$483k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$68k
Largest
01What it funds
0179% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Human Services$501kEducation$159kCrime & Legal$100kReligion$56kHealth$51kFood & Nutrition$47kYouth Development$40kInternational$23kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 23 grants below total $353,450, the rows itemized in this filing. The $482,950 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $129,500 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k22 grants · $286k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $68k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$67,950
Nassau County Aux Police$32,000
Collective Kindness Inc$30,000
Five Towns Early Learning Cen$18,000
Chabad of Five Towns$15,000
Work At It$13,500
Kulanu$12,500
Lawrence High School$12,500
HAFTR High School$12,000
Leon Mayar Fund$10,000
Rock and Wrap It Up Inc$10,000
Davis Memorial Fund$10,000
Lawrence Woodmere Academy$10,000
Shulamith School for Girls$10,000
Domestic Harmony Foundation$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $171k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 58% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Hebrew Free Loan Society: $100k → 17%SIBS Place: $11k → 6%Ani Ledodi Inc: $10k → 6%Davis Memorial Fund: $10k → 6%Ani Ledodi Inc: $10k → 6%Domestic Harmony Foundation: $10k → 6%Domestic Harmony Foundation: $10k → 6%Domestic Harmony Foundation: $10k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 21 repeat orgs$333k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
8

Total granted

$1.9M
$241k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+9%

Still filing today

43%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $93k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationEmploymentHealthCommunity ImprovementInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FT
    FIVE TOWNS EARLY LEARNING CENTER INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $209k · revenue +37%
  • WI
    WORKATIT INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $54k · revenue +59%
  • RO
    RAY OF HOPE INSTITUTE INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $50k · revenue +646%

Funded once

  • HF
    HEBREW FREE LOAN SOCIETY INC
    one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +9%
  • S
    SHOP
    one grant, 2018 · $50k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hannah Kosher Food Shabbat Fndt for Poor & Needy Women Corp

food pantry

Human Services
2
American Friends of Yeshivat Hesder Rishon Lezion Inc

To help school children in financial need

Religion
3
American Friends of Kiryat Chinuch Labonim Inc

To provide grants to institutions providing religious education, shelter,social & health services to underprivliged children

International
4
Friends of Harim Inc

Charitable grantmaking to religious institutions.

Religion
5
Zichron Meshilem Feish Inc

Provides finacial assistance to needy individuals and to religious, charitable organizations

—
6
Tat Family Relief Fund of Kolel Sha-Arei Shlomo Inc

To solicit funds for the needy English speaking immigrant families, mainly in Israel.

Philanthropy
7
Noam Shabbos Inc

To provide financial and other assistance to needy persons and families in Israel

Religion
8
Keren Dushinsky Inc

The organization provides charitable financial assistance to low-income families to help meet significant family expenses.

Human Services
9
Jewish Intuition Inc

Jewish Intuition Inc provides help to children who are struggling in their school home environment. We set the child up in their school environment or place them in a new school where they can better flourish

Education
10
Tzedek Vemunah Foundation
Religion
11
Avodah Shblayv

To provide charitable distributions to poverty stricken families in the new york area. this assistance consists of food packages before jewish holidays, financial aid to widows and impoverished families, help with medical bills, and…

Philanthropy
12
Kfar Yeladim David Inc

To care for the basic needs of disadvantaged children, to help them overcome trauma and rehabilitate them to become functional and productive members of society.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Five Towns Early Learning Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Lawrence Woodmere Academy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
11/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $800,118 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFIVE TOWNS EARLY LEARNING CENTER INC: $208,677 · OtherFIVE TOWNS EARLY LEARNING CENTER INCFIVE TOWNS COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $149,950 · OtherFIVE TOWNS COMMUNITY CENTER INCNassau County Aux Police: $132,000 · OtherNassau County Aux Police+20 more: $491,500 · Other+20 moreHEBREW FREE LOAN SOCIETY INC: $100,000 · Human ServicesDOMESTIC HARMONY FOUNDATION: $30,000 · Human ServicesAni Ledodi Inc: $20,000 · Human ServicesSIBS PLACE INC: $11,000 · Human ServicesDAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesWORKATIT INC: $53,500 · EmploymentRAY OF HOPE INSTITUTE INC: $50,000 · HealthROCK & WRAP IT UP INC: $46,000 · Community ImprovementKULANU INC: $35,000 · InternationalSHULAMITH SCHOOL FOR GIRLS INC: $22,500 · EducationLawrence Woodmere Academy: $10,000 · EducationCOLLECTIVE KINDNESS INC: $30,000 · Religion
Other$1,782,245Human Services$171,000Employment$53,500Health$50,000Community Improvement$46,000International$35,000Education$32,500Religion$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFIVE TOWNS EARLY LEARNING CENTER INC: $208,677 over 8y, 4.3% of budgetFIVE TOWNS COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $149,950 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetHEBREW FREE LOAN SOCIETY INC: $100,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetWORKATIT INC: $53,500 over 5y, 12% of budgetRAY OF HOPE INSTITUTE INC: $50,000 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetROCK & WRAP IT UP INC: $46,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetKULANU INC: $35,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetDOMESTIC HARMONY FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 3y, 10% of budgetCOLLECTIVE KINDNESS INC: $30,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetSHULAMITH SCHOOL FOR GIRLS INC: $22,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAni Ledodi Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSIBS PLACE INC: $11,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FIVE TOWNS EARLY LEARNING CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds FIVE TOWNS COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds HEBREW FREE LOAN SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds WORKATIT INC ↗
  • Who funds RAY OF HOPE INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds ROCK & WRAP IT UP INC ↗
  • Who funds KULANU INC ↗
  • Who funds DOMESTIC HARMONY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COLLECTIVE KINDNESS INC ↗
  • Who funds SHULAMITH SCHOOL FOR GIRLS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LEON MAYER FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Ani Ledodi Inc ↗
  • Who funds SIBS PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Lawrence Woodmere Academy ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY15× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Community Chest South Shore funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Community Chest South Shore. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Community Chest South Shore’s filings →

    More from the funding graph