Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Community Center for Education Results

Ccer drives systems change in education by centering student experiences, propelling robust research, and partnering with communities to transform washington state schools.

$694k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$171k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

Education$3.5MCommunity Improvement$2.6MHuman Services$291kMembership Benefit$273kYouth Development$107kCrime & Legal$67kArts & Culture$61kHousing & Shelter$56kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $40k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $654k
$91,628
Median grant
3
States reached
$907k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EDUCATION NORTHWEST (EDNW)$171,019
WEST ED$156,500
OPEN DOORS FOR MULTICULTURAL FAMILIES$99,817
EAST AFRICAN COMMUNITY SERVICES (EACS)$91,628
VILLA COMUNITARIA$68,523
SOUTH KING COUNTY DISCIPLINE COALITION$66,700
WASHINGTON STATE PARENT AMBASSADORS$40,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $526k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%THE VILLAGE OF HOPE: $15k → 9%THE SILENT TASK FORCE: $72k → 9%THE SILENT TASK FORCE: $70k → 9%OPEN DOORS FOR MULTICULTURAL FAMILIES: $100k → 9%THE SILENT TASK FORCE: $58k → 9%THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $40k → 9%THE SILENT TASK FORCE: $25k → 9%THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $24k → 9%THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $17k → 9%TUKWILA CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $14k → 9%EAST AFRICAN COMMUNITY SERVICES (EACS): $92k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$6.2M · 21 repeat orgs$745k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +9% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

21 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 19 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
11

Total granted

$6.2M
$378k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
0%

Still filing today

67%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $367k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureMembership BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RVC SEATTLE
    4× · 2019–2022 · $955k · revenue +336%
  • EN
    EDUCATION NORTHWEST
    2× · 2023–2024 · $369k · revenue +9%
  • BELONG Partners
    4× · 2019–2022 · $256k · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • HP
    HIGHLINE PUBLIC SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2023 · $116k
  • AS
    AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2023 · $84k
  • NB
    NATIONAL BLACK CHILD DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE INC
    one grant, 2021 · $40k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Washington Ethnic Studies Now

Washington Ethnic Studies Now WAESN is a multigenerational majority POC-led nonprofit advancing Ethnic Studies and racial justice in Washington. We center people of color build youth-centered leadership and learning and organize…

Education
2
Rainier Beach Cummunity Empowerment Coalition

Rainier Beach Action Coalition is a grassroot, Black-led organization devoted to locally driven development. It promotes quality education, living wage jobs, affordable transportation and housing, and building community capacity in…

Community Improvement
3
Seattle Amistad School

At Seattle Amistad School, we foster community integrity through rigorous bilingual and bicultural education, developing our students' academic strengths and cultural sensibilities, while nurturing compassionate and engaged citizens.

Education
4
Brightspark Early Learning Services

To nurture and sustain child-centered, antiracist early learning communities.Our work is to:1) Help families access high quality childcare and after-school care.2) Increase the availability of high-quality care through coaching and…

Human Services
5
Puget Sound Community School

Founded in 1994, PSCS is a small, independent middle and high school located in the Chinatown/International District of downtown Seattle. PSCS is committed to co-creating a brave space for community-centered education, critical curriculum,…

6
Rainier Scholars

Cultivates the academic potential and leadership skills of underrepresented students. by creating access to opportunities and holistic support, we increase college graduation rates and empower new generations of leaders.

Education
7
Washington State Family and Community Engagement Trust

Washington Family Engagement fosters social transformation by supporting the development of mulitgenerational leaders from diverse backgrounds to become actively engaged in schools and communities in Washington State.

Philanthropy
8
Seattle Institute for Early Childhood Development

Hilltop is transforming early childhood education through play, collaboration, and reflection: in our classrooms with children, partnerships with families, and professional development with educators.

Education
9
Reclaiming Our Greatness

Reclaiming Our Greatness's mission is to create transformative outcomes for the families we serve by providing proactive case management coupled with creative resource development.

Housing & Shelter
10
Seattle JazzED

Through Jazz education that liberates and inspires, Seattle JazzED increase access in the music room, celebrates student expression, and builds lasting connection rooted in community.

Arts & Culture
11
Community Cafe Collaborative

Community based work, focused on strengthening families and youth through community cafe sessions.

Public Benefit
12
Southeast Seattle Education Coalition

The mission of SESEC is to convene and resource communities of color to advocate for an equitable education system.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rvc Seattle and the most unlike its peers is Glover Empowermentoring. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyEarly Childhood Development…Professional & Trade Associ…College Foundation SupportImmigrant & Refugee Communi…Youth Music Education & Per…Youth & Family Support Serv…International Development A…Homeless Services & ShelterSupportive Housing & Servic…Washington Stem Education A…Youth Sports Leagues
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 22 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%4%<5yr15%21%5–10yr19%21%10–20yr19%29%20–35yr12%17%35–55yr12%8%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr15%31%5–10yr19%45%10–20yr19%11%20–35yr12%2%35–55yr12%11%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 5% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
5%
2/37
the rest of the field
14%
1,717/12,702

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/27
Grantees still filing
10/27
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT #403 — $2,006,192 · OtherRENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT #403WESTED — $368,400 · OtherWESTEDTHRIVE YOGA — $285,080 · OtherTHRIVE YOGAHIGHLINE PUBLIC SCHOOLS — $115,592 · Other+14 more — $589,941 · Other+14 moreRVC SEATTLE — $954,703 · Community ImprovementRVC SEATTLECIS OF GREATER KING COUNTY DBA COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS — $142,806 · Community ImprovementCIS OF GREATER KIN…TeamChild — $66,700 · Community ImprovementTeamChildTUKWILA SCHOOL DISTRICT INTEGRATED FUNDED HRA TRUST — $721,421 · Membership BenefitTUKWILA SCH…The Silent Task Force — $225,156 · Human ServicesOPEN DOORS FOR MULTICULTURAL FAMILIES — $99,817 · Human ServicesEast African Community Services — $91,628 · Human ServicesSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL COUNCIL O — $80,556 · Human Services+2 more — $28,500 · Human ServicesThe Backpack Academy — $265,000 · EducationTechbridge Girls — $81,556 · EducationTeam Read — $46,750 · EducationWashington State Association of Head State and ECEA Programs — $40,000 · EducationNORTHWEST EDUCATION ACCESS — $25,000 · EducationGreen River College Foundation — $20,000 · EducationEDUCATION NORTHWEST — $368,933 · Public BenefitBELONG Partners — $256,274 · Youth DevelopmentGLOVER EMPOWERMENTORING — $71,000 · Youth Development
Other$3,365,205Community Improvement$1,164,209Membership Benefit$721,421Human Services$525,657Education$478,306Public Benefit$368,933Youth Development$327,274

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetRVC SEATTLE — $954,703 over 4y, 15% of budgetEDUCATION NORTHWEST — $368,933 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetThe Backpack Academy — $265,000 over 3y, 8.2% of budgetBELONG Partners — $256,274 over 4y, 5.3% of budgetThe Silent Task Force — $225,156 over 4y, 21% of budgetCIS OF GREATER KING COUNTY DBA COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS — $142,806 over 4y, 3.9% of budgetOPEN DOORS FOR MULTICULTURAL FAMILIES — $99,817 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetEast African Community Services — $91,628 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetTechbridge Girls — $81,556 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL COUNCIL O — $80,556 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetGLOVER EMPOWERMENTORING — $71,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetVILLA COMUNITARIA — $68,523 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetSomali Youth & Family Club — $66,806 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetTeamChild — $66,700 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCHILDHAVEN — $57,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetAFRICAN COMMUNITY HOUSING & DEVELOPMENT — $55,556 over 3y, 6.0% of budgetTeam Read — $46,750 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetBrazil Center — $46,000 over 2y, 50% of budgetWashington State Association of Head State and ECEA Programs — $40,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetRENTON AREA YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES — $35,556 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetNORTHWEST EDUCATION ACCESS — $25,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetGreen River College Foundation — $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCITIESRISE INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetINTIMAN THEATRE — $15,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetVILLAGE OF HOPE — $15,000 over 1y, 8.6% of budgetTukwila Childrens Foundation — $13,500 over 1y, 7.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Seattle FoundationWA41.6× affinity22 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · United Way of King County · School's Out Washington · Gates Foundation · Renton Regional Community Fndn · The Norcliffe Foundation · Sheng-Yen Lu Foundation · Building Changes · Medina Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Stolte Family Foundation · Inatai Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Community Center for Education Results funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 44%
  • Education Northwest44% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Community Center for Education Results?

Find your warmest path to Community Center for Education Results through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph