Skip to content
Community Care of North Carolina Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Community Care of North Carolina Inc

To foster and enhance quality, efficiency and access to health care services for patients in need of such services, particularly patient populations that are vulnerable and/or underserved.

$15M
Granted FY2025still arriving
314
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$544k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Health$25MFood & Nutrition$1.4MEmployment$500kEducation$414kPublic Safety & Disaster$100kHuman Services$15k
02FY2025 · 314 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 314 grants below total $14,203,924, the rows itemized in this filing. The $15,168,897 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $964,973 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k68 grants · $487k
  • $10k–50k157 grants · $3.7M
  • $50k–250k82 grants · $7.4M
  • $250k+7 grants · $2.6M
$23,167
Median grant
3
States reached
$191M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KINTEGRA HEALTH$543,708
GOSHEN MEDICAL CENTER$466,035
GOLDSBORO PEDIATRICS PA$373,258
PIEDMONT HEALTH SERVICES INC$338,545
MED FIRST IMMEDIATE CARE AND FAMILY PRACTICE$313,674
CAROMONT MEDICAL GROUP$304,555
UNC FOUNDATION INC$250,000
SANDHILLS PEDIATRICS$207,079
KIDS FIRST PEDIATRICS OF RAEFORD PC$183,083
BETHANY MEDICAL CENTER$177,398
CORNELIUS F CATHACART PEDIATRICS PA HENDERSON$173,319
EASTERN CAROLINA PEDIATRICS PA$169,003
MIDCAROLINA PEDIATRICS PA$166,673
RAINBOW PEDIATRICS OF FAYETTEVILLE$156,325
FHPG LLC$155,969
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $75k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 29% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GRACE CLINIC OF YADKIN VALLEY: $7k → 17%FOSTER FAMILY ALLIANCE: $15k → 13%GALATIANS FOUNDATION: $31k → 8%GALATIANS FOUNDATION: $22k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$25M · 251 repeat orgs$2.7M to everyone else

251 repeat relationships: 249 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 65 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

251
31

Total granted

$25M
$998k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+2%
+6%

Still filing today

7%
23%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.7M went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NC
    NORTH CAROLINA ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS FOUNDATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +87% · 60% of their budget
  • Reinvestment Partners
    4× · 2022–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +74%
  • NC
    NORTH CAROLINA PEDIATRIC SOCIETY INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +69% · 56% of their budget

Funded once

  • EC
    EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2023 · $150k
  • CU
    CPESN USA
    one grant, 2023 · $150k
  • FO
    FIRSTHEALTH OF THE CAROLINAS INC
    one grant, 2024 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Carolina Family Health Centers Inc

Carolina Family Health Centers, Inc. provides accessible and affordable health care with excellence...where patients come FIRST

—
2
Carolinas Center for Medical Excellence Found ation
Health
3
First Choice Community Health Ctrs

Providing healthcare to the underserved population of Harnett County NC and the surrounding area.

Health
4
Carolina Health Centers Inc

Carolina health centers offers primary care and patient support services to improve health, well-being and quality of life throughout the communities we serve.

Health
5
Wnc Health Network Inc

WNC Health Network, Inc supports people and organizations to improve community health and wellbeing across Western North Carolina.

Health
6
North Florida Medical Centers Inc

To increase access to quality healthcare and improve the overall health of the community.

Health
7
Granville Health Inc

The purpose of the corporation is to engage in charitable efforts and to support granville health system in providing healthcare and related services to the citizens and residents of granville county and the surrounding community.

Health
8
Anson Regional Medical Services Inc

Provide total quality and accessible community oriented health care

Health
9
Grace Health Inc

To provide patient-centered healthcare with excellence in quality, service and access.

Health
10
University Health Systems of Eastern Carolina Inc

To improve the health and well-being of eastern north carolina.

Health
11
North Carolina Business Group On Health Inc

To educate, advocate, and innovate for a better healthcare delivery system in nc.

Health
12
Cumberland Medical Center

Cumberland Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of the patient's ability to pay.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Goshen Medical Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 347 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/31
Grantees still filing
16/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GASTON FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES INC: $941,283 · OtherGOLDSBORO PEDIATRICS PA: $756,431 · Other+182 more: $16,817,429 · Other+182 moreNORTH CAROLINA ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS FOUNDATION: $1,450,000 · HealthNORTH CAROLINA ACADEM…NORTH CAROLINA PEDIATRIC SOCIETY INC: $1,150,000 · HealthNORTH CAROLINA PEDIAT…GOSHEN MEDICAL CENTER INC: $800,594 · HealthGOSHEN MEDICAL CENTER…CAROMONT MEDICAL GROUP INC: $494,473 · HealthCAROMONT MEDICAL GROU…PIEDMONT HEALTH SERVICES INC: $338,545 · HealthPIEDMONT HEALTH SERVI…GREENE COUNTY HEALTH CARE INCORPORATED: $196,661 · HealthAPPALACHIAN MOUNTAIN COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS: $184,859 · Health+4 more: $306,472 · Health+4 moreReinvestment Partners: $1,360,000 · Community ImprovementUNC HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $500,000 · EducationFAYETTEVILLE AREA HEALTH EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $94,310 · EducationAmity Medical Group Inc: $88,118 · EducationGALATIANS COMMUNITY HEALTH: $53,226 · Human Services
Other$18,515,143Health$4,921,604Community Improvement$1,360,000Education$682,428Human Services$53,226

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNORTH CAROLINA ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS FOUNDATION: $1,450,000 over 3y, 60% of budgetReinvestment Partners: $1,360,000 over 4y, 5.6% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA PEDIATRIC SOCIETY INC: $1,150,000 over 2y, 56% of budgetGASTON FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES INC: $941,283 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetGOSHEN MEDICAL CENTER INC: $800,594 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetUNC HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $500,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCAROMONT MEDICAL GROUP INC: $494,473 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA MEDICAL SOCIETY FOUNDATION INC: $250,000 over 2y, 7.7% of budgetGREENE COUNTY HEALTH CARE INCORPORATED: $196,661 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetAPPALACHIAN MOUNTAIN COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS: $184,859 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNorth Carolina Community Health Center Assoc Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFAYETTEVILLE AREA HEALTH EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $94,310 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMETROPOLITAN COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES INC: $91,052 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetAmity Medical Group Inc: $88,118 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHIGH COUNTRY COMMUNITY HEALTH INC: $76,665 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBLACK RIVER HEALTH SERVICES INC: $75,776 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetGALATIANS COMMUNITY HEALTH: $53,226 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetMt Olive Family Medicine Center Inc: $38,755 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetBENSON AREA MEDICAL CENTER INC: $37,410 over 2y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NORTH CAROLINA ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Reinvestment Partners ↗
  • Who funds NORTH CAROLINA PEDIATRIC SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds GASTON FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds GOSHEN MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds UNC HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CAROMONT MEDICAL GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds PIEDMONT HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH CAROLINA MEDICAL SOCIETY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GREENE COUNTY HEALTH CARE INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds APPALACHIAN MOUNTAIN COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

North Carolina Commun…Reach Out and Read IncThe Golden Leaf IncNorth Carolina Public…North Carolina Commun…The Duke EndowmentNorth Carolina Medica…Upstream USA IncDogwood Health TrustDelta Dental FundNorth Carolina Allian…North Carolina Health…
North Carolina Community Care Networks IncNC46.2× affinity20 shared granteesties to 6 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: North Carolina Community Care Networks Inc · Reach Out and Read Inc · The Golden Leaf Inc · North Carolina Public Health Association · North Carolina Community Health Center Assoc Inc · The Duke Endowment · North Carolina Medical Society Foundation Inc · Upstream USA Inc · Dogwood Health Trust · Delta Dental Fund · North Carolina Alliance of Public Health Agencies Inc · North Carolina Healthcare Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Community Care of North Carolina Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Community Care of North Carolina Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 347 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Community Care of North Carolina’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home