· Public charity
Community Care of North Carolina Inc
To foster and enhance quality, efficiency and access to health care services for patients in need of such services, particularly patient populations that are vulnerable and/or underserved.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 314 grants below total $14,203,924 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $15,168,897 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $964,973 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k68 grants · $487k
- $10k–50k157 grants · $3.7M
- $50k–250k82 grants · $7.4M
- $250k+7 grants · $2.6M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| KINTEGRA HEALTH | $543,708 |
| GOSHEN MEDICAL CENTER | $466,035 |
| GOLDSBORO PEDIATRICS PA | $373,258 |
| PIEDMONT HEALTH SERVICES INC | $338,545 |
| MED FIRST IMMEDIATE CARE AND FAMILY PRACTICE | $313,674 |
| CAROMONT MEDICAL GROUP | $304,555 |
| UNC FOUNDATION INC | $250,000 |
| SANDHILLS PEDIATRICS | $207,079 |
| KIDS FIRST PEDIATRICS OF RAEFORD PC | $183,083 |
| BETHANY MEDICAL CENTER | $177,398 |
| CORNELIUS F CATHACART PEDIATRICS PA HENDERSON | $173,319 |
| EASTERN CAROLINA PEDIATRICS PA | $169,003 |
| MIDCAROLINA PEDIATRICS PA | $166,673 |
| RAINBOW PEDIATRICS OF FAYETTEVILLE | $156,325 |
| FHPG LLC | $155,969 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–25, $75k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 29% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
251 repeat relationships — 249 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 65 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.7M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NCNORTH CAROLINA ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS FOUNDATION3× · 2022–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +240% · 60% of their budget
Reinvestment Partners4× · 2022–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +74%- NCNORTH CAROLINA PEDIATRIC SOCIETY INC2× · 2023–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +69% · 56% of their budget
Funded once
- ECEAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITYone grant, 2023 · $150k
- CUCPESN USAone grant, 2023 · $150k
- FOFIRSTHEALTH OF THE CAROLINAS INCone grant, 2024 · $100k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Carolina Family Health Centers, Inc. provides accessible and affordable health care with excellence...where patients come FIRST
Providing healthcare to the underserved population of Harnett County NC and the surrounding area.
Carolina health centers offers primary care and patient support services to improve health, well-being and quality of life throughout the communities we serve.
WNC Health Network, Inc supports people and organizations to improve community health and wellbeing across Western North Carolina.
To increase access to quality healthcare and improve the overall health of the community.
The purpose of the corporation is to engage in charitable efforts and to support granville health system in providing healthcare and related services to the citizens and residents of granville county and the surrounding community.
Provide total quality and accessible community oriented health care
To provide patient-centered healthcare with excellence in quality, service and access.
To improve the health and well-being of eastern north carolina.
To educate, advocate, and innovate for a better healthcare delivery system in nc.
Cumberland Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of the patient's ability to pay.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Goshen Medical Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 347 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NORTH CAROLINA ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Reinvestment Partners ↗
- Who funds NORTH CAROLINA PEDIATRIC SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds GASTON FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds GOSHEN MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds UNC HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CAROMONT MEDICAL GROUP INC ↗
- Who funds PIEDMONT HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds NORTH CAROLINA MEDICAL SOCIETY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds GREENE COUNTY HEALTH CARE INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds APPALACHIAN MOUNTAIN COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: North Carolina Community Care Networks Inc · Reach Out and Read Inc · The Golden Leaf Inc · North Carolina Public Health Association · North Carolina Community Health Center Assoc Inc · The Duke Endowment · North Carolina Medical Society Foundation Inc · Upstream USA Inc · Dogwood Health Trust · Delta Dental Fund · North Carolina Alliance of Public Health Agencies Inc · North Carolina Healthcare Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Community Care of North Carolina Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.