Skip to content

· Public charity

Community Alliance With Family Farmers

CAFF's mission is to build sustainable food and farming systems through policy advocacy and on-the-ground programs that create more resilient family farms, communities, and ecosystems.

$1.9M
Granted FY2024still arriving
68
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$1.1MPublic Safety & Disaster$240kEducation$68kInternational$41kEnvironment$32kCommunity Improvement$31kHealth$20kScience & Tech$18kOther$0
02FY2024 · 68 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 68 grants below total $959,149, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,892,899 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $933,750 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k32 grants · $225k
  • $10k–50k35 grants · $674k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$7.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UC Regents$60,253
Multiplier$37,945
Central Coast Aliance United for a Sustainable Economy$26,000
Centro Binacional de Desarrollo Indigena Oaxaqueno$26,000
Central CA Environmental Justice Network$26,000
MMC Organic Farms$20,200
Guan Huanlun$20,000
Papa Joe Farm$20,000
Three Springs Community Farm Foundation Inc$20,000
Rainwater Ranch LLC$20,000
Seven Moons Farm LLC$20,000
Laguna Farm CSA Ignacio Romero$20,000
BENISE MANAGEMENT LLC$20,000
Mei Huan Huang$20,000
Tollgate Partners$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 63% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%The Tides Center: $8k → 10%Sacred Heart Community Service: $8k → 8%Special Service for Groups Inc: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Urban Tilth

Urban Tilth is a California nonprofit organization committed to educate diverse communities about organic gardening and to support a network of gardens dedicated to sustainable, local food production. Urban Tilth insipires, hires, and…

Environment
2
Smart Yards Education

To improve the living standards of low income, unskilled workers in silicon valley by offering education in ecological landscaping and cooperative business models

Environment
3
Valley Verde

Valley verde increases self-sufficiency, health, and resilience, through a culturally informed community based food system to promote food justice.

Human Services
4
Black Seeds

prove asset to organic food

Food & Nutrition
5
Homegrown Inc

We provide education regarding Agriculture and nutrition for underserved individuals and communities. Last year we engages and taught over 50 children from 3-13 years of age from such communities. As well as provided discounted rated for…

Education
6
Sustainable Growers
—
7
Ourfoods Us Bod

Agricultural education

—
8
Center for the study of the Americas

Within the Americas promoting dialogue and research, producing studies and reports, conducting courses and conferences particularly in the areas of agroecology and food security

—
9
Arif Urban Agrarian Collective

Part III Program Services Accomplishments - Arif Urban Agrarian Collective (AUAC) provides urban agriculture education to the City Heights neighborhood of San Diego.

Education
10
Coastal Roots Farm

Coastal roots farm cultivates healthy, connected communities by integrating sustainable agriculture, food justice, and ancient jewish wisdom.

—
11
Ujamaa Farmer Collective Association

Carrying out the policy of Californias to support socially disadvantaged farmers through The Farmers Equity Act and with pending state funding, the mission of Ujamaa Farmer Collective Association is empowering historically underserved…

Community Improvement
12
Black Urban Farmers Association
Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shift Our Ways Collective; the most unlike its peers is Renaissance Parents of Success. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 150 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
9/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS: $60,253 · Other+128 more: $1,181,550 · Other+128 moreKITCHEN TABLE ADVISORS: $37,945 · Food & NutritionTHREE SPRINGS COMMUNITY FARM FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · Food & NutritionSOLUTIONS FOR URBAN AGRICULTURE: $7,500 · Food & NutritionFARM TO FIGHT HUNGER: $7,500 · Food & NutritionEco Urban Gardens: $7,500 · Food & NutritionALMA BACKYARD FARM: $7,500 · Food & NutritionGrowing Roots: $7,500 · Food & NutritionPEOPLE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $7,500 · Food & NutritionCentral California Environmental Justice Network: $26,000 · EnvironmentSHIFT OUR WAYS COLLECTIVE: $8,000 · EnvironmentECOCENTER INC: $7,650 · EnvironmentCOMMON VISION: $7,500 · EnvironmentCentro Binacional Para El Desarrollo Indigena Oaxaqueno: $46,000 · InternationalCentral Coast Alliance United for a Sustainable Economy: $26,000 · Community ImprovementRural Communities Resource Center: $10,000 · Community ImprovementProvidence International Enterprises: $5,000 · Community ImprovementSACRED HEART COMMUNITY SERVICE: $7,500 · Human ServicesTIDES CENTER: $7,500 · Human ServicesSpecial Service for Groups Inc: $5,001 · Human ServicesDONORSCHOOSEORG: $7,500 · EducationRenaissance Parents of Success: $7,500 · Employment
Other$1,241,803Food & Nutrition$102,945Environment$49,150International$46,000Community Improvement$41,000Human Services$20,001Education$7,500Employment$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCentro Binacional Para El Desarrollo Indigena Oaxaqueno: $46,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetKITCHEN TABLE ADVISORS: $37,945 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCentral California Environmental Justice Network: $26,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCentral Coast Alliance United for a Sustainable Economy: $26,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHREE SPRINGS COMMUNITY FARM FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetRural Communities Resource Center: $10,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetSHIFT OUR WAYS COLLECTIVE: $8,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetECOCENTER INC: $7,650 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMON VISION: $7,500 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOLUTIONS FOR URBAN AGRICULTURE: $7,500 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetFARM TO FIGHT HUNGER: $7,500 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetEco Urban Gardens: $7,500 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetRenaissance Parents of Success: $7,500 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetALMA BACKYARD FARM: $7,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGrowing Roots: $7,500 over 1y, 8.0% of budgetSACRED HEART COMMUNITY SERVICE: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTIDES CENTER: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEOPLE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetSpecial Service for Groups Inc: $5,001 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetProvidence International Enterprises: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Centro Binacional Para El Desarrollo Indigena Oaxaqueno ↗
  • Who funds KITCHEN TABLE ADVISORS ↗
  • Who funds Central California Environmental Justice Network ↗
  • Who funds Central Coast Alliance United for a Sustainable Economy ↗
  • Who funds THREE SPRINGS COMMUNITY FARM FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

PatagoniaorgCA18.3× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Patagoniaorg · The California Wellness Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · The Schmidt Family Foundation · Liberty Hill Foundation · Public Health Institute · Clif Family Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · The James Irvine Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · California Community Foundation · East Bay Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Community Alliance With Family Farmers funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Community Alliance With Family Farmers. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 150 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Community Alliance With Family Farmers’ filings →

    More from the funding graph