Skip to content
Community Action Partnership of North Dakota Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Community Action Partnership of North Dakota Inc

Serve as a catalyst for training, technical assistance, program development, evaluation, research, fundraising, and public education for community action agencies in north dakota.

$2.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$673k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$8.2MCommunity Improvement$320kEmployment$65kPhilanthropy$6k
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$376,611
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SENDCAA - FARGO & JAMESTOWN CAP$672,953
COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP$411,477
RED RIVER VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION - GRAND FORKS$376,611
COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP-MINOT REGION$281,333
COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP - BISMARCK$250,783
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $8.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%UTAH COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $58k → 6%UTAH COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $16k → 8%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $411k → 9%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP-MINOT REGION: $301k → 10%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP - BISMARCK: $251k → 10%SENDCAA - FARGO & JAMESTOWN CAP: $673k → 12%DAKOTA PRAIRIE COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $148k → 13%RED RIVER VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION - GRAND FORKS: $377k → 13%INTER-LAKES COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $68k → 10%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $221k → 9%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP-MINOT REGION: $281k → 10%COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM REGION VII: $196k → 10%SENDCAA - FARGO & JAMESTOWN CAP: $569k → 12%DAKOTA PRAIRIE COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $124k → 13%RED RIVER VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION - GRAND FORKS: $247k → 13%INTER-LAKES COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $7k → 10%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $211k → 9%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP-MINOT REGION: $251k → 10%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP - BISMARCK: $170k → 10%SENDCAA - FARGO & JAMESTOWN CAP: $362k → 12%DAKOTA PRAIRIE COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $117k → 13%RED RIVER VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION - GRAND FORKS: $221k → 13%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $207k → 9%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP-MINOT REGION: $225k → 10%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP - BISMARCK: $167k → 10%SOUTHEASTERN NORTH DAKOTA COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $328k → 12%DAKOTA PRAIRIE COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $108k → 13%RED RIVER VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION: $218k → 13%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $193k → 9%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP-MINOT REGION: $161k → 10%COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM REGION VII: $158k → 10%SOUTHEASTERN NORTH DAKOTA COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $213k → 12%DAKOTA PRAIRIE COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $28k → 13%RED RIVER VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION: $158k → 13%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $154k → 9%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP-MINOT REGION: $101k → 10%COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM REGION VII: $98k → 10%SOUTHEASTERN NORTH DAKOTA COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $163k → 12%DAKOTA PRAIRIE COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $23k → 13%RED RIVER VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION: $130k → 13%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $47k → 9%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP-MINOT REGION: $22k → 10%COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM REGION VII: $20k → 10%SOUTHEASTERN NORTH DAKOTA COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $25k → 12%RED RIVER VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION: $28k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
ND
WY
SD
OH
UT
CO
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.6M · 12 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +45% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
2

Total granted

$8.6M
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+18%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SN
    SOUTHEASTERN NORTH DAKOTA COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY
    7× · 2018–2024 · $2.3M · revenue +35%
  • CA
    COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP
    7× · 2018–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +4%
  • RR
    RED RIVER VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION
    7× · 2018–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • NC
    NATIONAL COMMUNITY ACTION FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2017 · $6k · revenue +18%
  • OA
    OHIO ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCIES
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue -66%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
South Central Community Action Partnership Inc

To provide a wide range of services in an effort to help improve the quality of life for people with an economic disadvantage.

—
2
Community Action for Improvement Inc

The mission of community action for improvement, inc. is to build sustainable communities with partners by providing services and resources utilizing the whole family approach with low-income households to help reduce the burdens of…

—
3
Community Action Agency of Northwest Alabama Inc

Our mission is to reduce the causes and adverse consequences of poverty and to empower low-income individuals, families and communities to achieve self-sufficiency through advocacy, resource utilization and service delivery.

—
4
Community Action Agency of Northeast Alabama Inc

To assist individuals at or below the poverty line by providing resources, funding, and education.

Human Services
5
Community Action Partnership of North Dakota Inc

Serve as a catalyst for training, technical assistance, program development, evaluation, research, fundraising, and public education for community action agencies in north dakota.

Human Services
6
Community Action of Nebraska Inc

Mission: community action of nebraska strives to alleviate poverty through enhancing program development, providing technical assistance, and advocating public policy to support all community action agencies in nebraska.

Community Improvement
7
Community Action of Southeast Iowa

The organization is dedicated to alleviating the conditions and causes of poverty by building partnerships and strengthening people through quality services. community action of southeast iowa administers programs funded or supported by…

—
8
West Central Minnesota Communities Action Inc

Empowering people while providing services and resources that impact individuals and communities.

Community Improvement
9
Community Action Commission of Fayette County

Administers grants and contracts to help the lives of those individuals who fall below the poverty level.

—
10
West Central Community Action

In partnership with state and federal government, our mission is to administer programs designed to help residents in our 10-county region of southwest iowa achieve self-sufficiency.

Human Services
11
Community Action Partnership of Central Illinois Inc

Agency provides community assistance to low income families and individuals including assistance with utility bills, home weatherization, emergency housing

Human Services
12
Minnesota Community Action Partnership

To strengthen the capacity of its member agencies to achieve their poverty-fighting missions, through influential advocacy, collaboration, and training.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Action Region Vi; the most unlike its peers is Western States Learning Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
13/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SOUTHEASTERN NORTH DAKOTA COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $2,333,218 · Human ServicesSOUTHEASTERN NORTH DAKOTA COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCYCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $1,443,592 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIPRED RIVER VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION: $1,378,398 · Human ServicesRED RIVER VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTIONCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP - MINOT REGION: $1,343,092 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP - MINOT REGIONCOMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM REGION VII INC: $1,059,659 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM REGION VII INCDAKOTA PRAIRIE COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC: $548,077 · Human ServicesDAKOTA PRAIRIE COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC+2 more: $149,830 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY ACTION REGION VI: $100,286 · Housing & ShelterCOLORADO COMMUNITY ACTION ASSOCIATION INC: $95,594 · Community ImprovementMONTANA HRDC DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION: $65,420 · OtherNATIONAL COMMUNITY ACTION FOUNDATION INC: $6,322 · OtherOHIO ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCIES: $5,000 · OtherWESTERN STATES LEARNING CORPORATION: $69,611 · Education
Human Services$8,255,866Housing & Shelter$100,286Community Improvement$95,594Other$76,742Education$69,611

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSOUTHEASTERN NORTH DAKOTA COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $2,333,218 over 7y, 5.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $1,443,592 over 7y, 7.2% of budgetRED RIVER VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION: $1,378,398 over 7y, 11% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP - MINOT REGION: $1,343,092 over 7y, 11% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM REGION VII INC: $1,059,659 over 7y, 6.9% of budgetDAKOTA PRAIRIE COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC: $548,077 over 6y, 8.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION REGION VI: $100,286 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetCOLORADO COMMUNITY ACTION ASSOCIATION INC: $95,594 over 2y, 25% of budgetINTER-LAKES COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INC: $75,536 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetUTAH COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP ASSOCIATION INC: $74,294 over 2y, 14% of budgetWESTERN STATES LEARNING CORPORATION: $69,611 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetMONTANA HRDC DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION: $65,420 over 2y, 96% of budgetNATIONAL COMMUNITY ACTION FOUNDATION INC: $6,322 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetOHIO ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCIES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Great Plains Food BankOtto Bremer TrustAmazonsmile Foundation
Great Plains Food BankND15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Great Plains Food Bank · Otto Bremer Trust · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Community Action Partnership of North Dakota Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Community Action Partnership of North Dakota Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Community Action Partnership of North Dakota Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Community Action Partnership of North Dakota Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Community Action Partnership of North Dakota’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home