· Public charity
Community Action Partnership of North Dakota Inc
Serve as a catalyst for training, technical assistance, program development, evaluation, research, fundraising, and public education for community action agencies in north dakota.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SENDCAA - FARGO & JAMESTOWN CAP | $672,953 |
| COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP | $411,477 |
| RED RIVER VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION - GRAND FORKS | $376,611 |
| COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP-MINOT REGION | $281,333 |
| COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP - BISMARCK | $250,783 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $8.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +45% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.
12 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SNSOUTHEASTERN NORTH DAKOTA COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY7× · 2018–2024 · $2.3M · revenue +35%
- CACOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP7× · 2018–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +4%
- RRRED RIVER VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION7× · 2018–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +14%
Funded once
- NCNATIONAL COMMUNITY ACTION FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2017 · $6k · revenue +18%
- OAOHIO ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCIESone grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue -66%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide a wide range of services in an effort to help improve the quality of life for people with an economic disadvantage.
The mission of community action for improvement, inc. is to build sustainable communities with partners by providing services and resources utilizing the whole family approach with low-income households to help reduce the burdens of…
Our mission is to reduce the causes and adverse consequences of poverty and to empower low-income individuals, families and communities to achieve self-sufficiency through advocacy, resource utilization and service delivery.
To assist individuals at or below the poverty line by providing resources, funding, and education.
Serve as a catalyst for training, technical assistance, program development, evaluation, research, fundraising, and public education for community action agencies in north dakota.
Mission: community action of nebraska strives to alleviate poverty through enhancing program development, providing technical assistance, and advocating public policy to support all community action agencies in nebraska.
The organization is dedicated to alleviating the conditions and causes of poverty by building partnerships and strengthening people through quality services. community action of southeast iowa administers programs funded or supported by…
Empowering people while providing services and resources that impact individuals and communities.
Administers grants and contracts to help the lives of those individuals who fall below the poverty level.
In partnership with state and federal government, our mission is to administer programs designed to help residents in our 10-county region of southwest iowa achieve self-sufficiency.
Agency provides community assistance to low income families and individuals including assistance with utility bills, home weatherization, emergency housing
To strengthen the capacity of its member agencies to achieve their poverty-fighting missions, through influential advocacy, collaboration, and training.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Action Region Vi and the most unlike its peers is Western States Learning Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SOUTHEASTERN NORTH DAKOTA COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP ↗
- Who funds RED RIVER VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP - MINOT REGION ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM REGION VII INC ↗
- Who funds DAKOTA PRAIRIE COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION REGION VI ↗
- Who funds COLORADO COMMUNITY ACTION ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds INTER-LAKES COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds UTAH COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds WESTERN STATES LEARNING CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds MONTANA HRDC DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL COMMUNITY ACTION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds OHIO ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCIES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Great Plains Food Bank · Otto Bremer Trust · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Community Action Partnership of North Dakota Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Community Action Partnership of North Dakota Inc?
Find your warmest path to Community Action Partnership of North Dakota Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.