Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Community Action Council of Lewis Mason & Thurston Counties

The community action council is a nonprofit agency committed to improving the quality of life for those in our community by helping meet the basic needs of housing, heating, safety, mental health, food and nutrition for families and individuals and to lessen the impact of poverty.

$11M
Granted FY2023
13
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$67k
Largest
01What you fund
0177% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20212023.

Food & Nutrition$509kHuman Services$120kReligion$8kOther$189k
02FY2023 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 13 grants below total $249,784 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $11,022,327 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $10,772,543 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k8 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $42k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $181k
$6,697
Median grant
1
States reached
$16M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THURSTON COUNTY FOOD BANK$67,288
THE SAINTS' PANTRY$59,547
HOOD CANAL FOOD BANK$53,989
YELM COMMUNITY SERVICES$30,939
NORTH MASON FOOD BANK$11,089
MATLOCK COMMUNITY CHURCH$8,459
NORTH KITSAP FISHLINE$6,697
BREMERTON FOODLINE$6,161
LEWIS COUNTY FOOD BANK COALITION$2,295
BRIDGE COMMUNITY CHURCH (PIONEER FOOD BANK)$1,587
WINLOCK-VADER FOOD BANK$867
LEWIS COUNTY GOSPEL MISSION$762
SPIRIT OF LIFE LUTHERAN CHURCH (LIFECARE COMMUNITY FOOD BANK)$104
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–23, $120k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 7% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%YELM COMMUNITY SERVICES: $31k → 9%YELM COMMUNITY SERVICES: $31k → 9%SOUTH KITSAP HELPLINE: $5k → 10%YELM COMMUNITY SERVICES: $17k → 9%NORTH KITSAP FISHLINE: $13k → 10%WINLOCK-VADER FOOD BANK: $8k → 12%NORTH KITSAP FISHLINE: $7k → 10%WINLOCK-VADER FOOD BANK: $867 → 12%NORTH KITSAP FISHLINE: $7k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$771k · 11 repeat orgs$55k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +50% since the first grant, against +2% for the ones you funded once.

11 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2023, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
4

Total granted

$771k
$52k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+2%

Still filing today

82%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23
Food & NutritionHuman ServicesReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THURSTON COUNTY FOOD BANK
    7× · 2017–2023 · $320k · revenue +118%
  • TS
    THE SAINT'S PANTRY FOOD BANK
    8× · 2017–2024 · $119k · revenue ×12
  • HC
    Hood Canal Food Bank
    8× · 2017–2024 · $115k · revenue +50% · 67% of their budget

Funded once

  • SF
    Sharenet Food Bankgraduated
    3× · 2021–2023 · $39k · revenue +110%
  • SV
    SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL CONFERENCE OF OUR LADY STAR
    7× · 2017–2023 · $7k · revenue +2%
  • SK
    SOUTH KITSAP HELPLINE
    7× · 2017–2023 · $5k · revenue -30%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Snohomish Community Food Bank

To provide food and services in a caring and dignified manner to neighbors in need

2
Lake Chelan Food Bank

The mission of Lake Chelan Food Bank is to treat each person we serve with dignity and respect and to provide balanced and varied options that give each person the liberty to meet the specific food needs for themsevles and/or their family.

Food & Nutrition
3
West Seattle Food Bank

West Seattle Food Bank strengthens the community through the power of neighbors helping neighbors, working to ensure all in our community have access to the essential necessities of living.

Food & Nutrition
4
Washington County Food Bank Inc

Food distribution to needy individuals and families.

Food & Nutrition
5
Port Angeles Food Bank

Nourishing our community. the port angeles food bank is the main food bank in clallam county, providing food to 13 other area pantries and meal programs as well as providing food to over 5,000 individuals per month.

Food & Nutrition
6
Nooksack Valley Food Bank Association

Our mission is to provide a variety of food products to families and individuals who are in need. We are open one day a week.

Food & Nutrition
7
South Corvallis Food Bank

Increase sustainable food security in South Corvallis by providing emergency food and supplies.

Food & Nutrition
8
Hoquiam Food and Clothing Bank

To provide food and clothing assistance to person in need.

Health
9
Sequim Food Bank

To provide food and assistance to individuals and organizations within our community so that "no one goes hungry in Sequim".Our 5 core values that guide our work:1. Compassion and Respect: Turn no one away from services and always…

10
Siskiyou Community Food Bank

We provided free healthy food to low-income families and individuals in need.

Food & Nutrition
11
Friday Harbor Food Bank

Collection and distribution of food for needy families

12
Snoqualmie Valley Food Bank

Our mission is to provide food and key resources to help our neighbors and community thrive. we lead the effort to feed, educated and advocate ending hunger in the snoqualmie valley and beyond.

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is North Kitsap Fishline and the most unlike its peers is Lewis County Food Bank Coalition. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%6%<5yr13%9%5–10yr20%9%10–20yr18%18%20–35yr13%38%35–55yr16%21%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr13%7%5–10yr20%14%10–20yr18%7%20–35yr13%72%35–55yr16%0%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/39
the rest of the field
12%
262/2,269

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
15/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THURSTON COUNTY FOOD BANK — $320,423 · Food & NutritionTHURSTON COUNTY FOOD BANKTHE SAINT'S PANTRY FOOD BANK — $119,094 · Food & NutritionTHE SAINT'S PANTRY FOOD BANKSharenet Food Bank — $39,401 · Food & NutritionSharenet Food BankNORTH MASON FOOD BANK — $30,021 · Food & NutritionNORTH MASON FOOD BANKHood Canal Food Bank — $114,989 · OtherHood Canal Food BankBremerton Foodline — $28,450 · OtherBremerton FoodlineMATLOCK COMMUNITY CHURCH — $26,565 · OtherMATLOCK COMMUNITY CHURCHSPIRIT OF LIFE LUTHERAN CHURCH — $9,361 · OtherLEWIS COUNTY FOOD BANK COALITION — $7,700 · Other+2 more — $2,171 · OtherYELM COMMUNITY SERVICES — $79,138 · Human ServicesYELM COMMUNITY S…NORTH KITSAP FISHLINE — $26,482 · Human ServicesNORTH KITSAP FIS…Winlock-Vader Food Bank — $8,947 · Human ServicesWinlock-Vader Fo…SOUTH KITSAP HELPLINE — $5,129 · Human ServicesSAINT VINCENT DE PAUL CONFERENCE OF OUR LADY STAR — $7,203 · ReligionLEWIS COUNTY GOSPEL MISSION — $762 · Religion
Food & Nutrition$508,939Other$189,236Human Services$119,696Religion$7,965

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHURSTON COUNTY FOOD BANK — $320,423 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetTHE SAINT'S PANTRY FOOD BANK — $119,094 over 8y, 3.2% of budgetHood Canal Food Bank — $114,989 over 8y, 67% of budgetYELM COMMUNITY SERVICES — $79,138 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetSharenet Food Bank — $39,401 over 3y, 7.0% of budgetNORTH MASON FOOD BANK — $30,021 over 8y, 2.4% of budgetBremerton Foodline — $28,450 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetNORTH KITSAP FISHLINE — $26,482 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetWinlock-Vader Food Bank — $8,947 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetLEWIS COUNTY FOOD BANK COALITION — $7,700 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetSAINT VINCENT DE PAUL CONFERENCE OF OUR LADY STAR — $7,203 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetSOUTH KITSAP HELPLINE — $5,129 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetLEWIS COUNTY GOSPEL MISSION — $762 over 6y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THURSTON COUNTY FOOD BANK
  • Who funds THE SAINT'S PANTRY FOOD BANK
  • Who funds Hood Canal Food Bank
  • Who funds YELM COMMUNITY SERVICES
  • Who funds Sharenet Food Bank
  • Who funds NORTH MASON FOOD BANK
  • Who funds Bremerton Foodline
  • Who funds NORTH KITSAP FISHLINE
  • Who funds Winlock-Vader Food Bank
  • Who funds LEWIS COUNTY FOOD BANK COALITION
  • Who funds SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL CONFERENCE OF OUR LADY STAR
  • Who funds SOUTH KITSAP HELPLINE
  • Who funds LEWIS COUNTY GOSPEL MISSION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Food LifelineWA50.6× affinity22 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Food Lifeline · Northwest Harvest Emm · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Kitsap Community Foundation · The Community Foundation of South Puget Sound · Kitsap Credit Union · First Fed Foundation · Coastal Harvest · United Way of Kitsap County · Fred H & Mary S Dore Charitable Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · Give Back Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Community Action Council of Lewis Mason & Thurston Counties funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $8.2M of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph