Skip to content

· Public charity

Communities Unlimited Inc

Communities Unlimited connects rural Americans to solutions that sustain healthy businesses, healthy communities and healthy lives through programs focused on community sustainability, entrepreneurship, charitable lending, healthy food and water initiatives.

$1.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$259k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$392kFood & Nutrition$387kCommunity Improvement$197kSocial Science$111kScience & Tech$65kPublic Safety & Disaster$64kPhilanthropy$26kArts & Culture$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 18 grants below total $659,216, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,160,594 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $501,378 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $224k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $154k
  • $250k+1 grant · $259k
$22,517
Median grant
5
States reached
$46M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Lamar State College$259,400
WE Center$100,000
City of Crockett$53,800
Mississippi State University$25,740
City of Zavalla$25,000
SouthWay Foundation$25,000
FORGE$25,000
Mississippi Heritage Trust$25,000
Weakley County School Distrist$22,517
Belzoni Humphreys County Industrial Development Foundation Inc$17,447
Pineland City$12,346
Milan Public School District$12,154
Trenton Special School District$12,154
Noxubee County Historical Society$11,889
City of Vilonia Volunteer Fire Department$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 55% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%Arkansas United Community Coalition: $10k → 14%Safe Haven Baby Box: $8k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IN
OH
KY
AR
TN
DC
MS
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

50%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$666k · 7 repeat orgs$662k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +14% since the first grant, against -37% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
7

Total granted

$666k
$298k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
-37%

Still filing today

43%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 45% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $364k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’24’25
Community ImprovementEducationHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesPublic BenefitSocial ScienceOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LS
    Lamar State College
    2× · 2024–2025 · $310k
  • THE URBAN INSTITUTE
    2× · 2020–2021 · $111k · revenue +14%
  • UO
    University of Kentucky Research Foundation
    2× · 2020–2021 · $90k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • ER
    Eat Real Certified Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $206k · revenue -37%
  • FO
    FEDERATION OF APPALACHIAN HOUSING ENTERPRISES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $37k · revenue +212%
  • HP
    Higher Purpose Hub
    one grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue +19%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
North Missindustrial Development a

Promoting northeast mississippi for industrial growth.

—
2
Ar-Tx Redi

To collaborate with site locators, facility managers, developers, and real estate agents. In doing so, the AR-TX REDI staff and board will serve as the central information source for response to proposals from prospective business and…

Community Improvement
3
Fayette County Industrial Development Corp

To procure, develop, and operate land and properties in order to create job opportunities and foster the economic development of connersville and fayette county.

Community Improvement
4
Missouri Partnership

In its role as the principal business recruitment and marketing organization for missouri, the missouri partnership attracts new jobs and business investments to the state through collaborative efforts with other state and local economic…

Community Improvement
5
Housing Hub

Building homes working families can afford. We are dedicated to: providing new, affordable homes to residents in the South Cumberland Plateau of Tennessee; preparing future and current homeowners to both acquire and maintain a safe and…

Housing & Shelter
6
Northwest Mississippi Realtor Foundation
Human Services
7
East Mississippi Development Corporation Meridian Community College
—
8
Urban Housing of America Inc Louisiana

Develop and manage multi-family low income housing.

Housing & Shelter
9
Mississippi United to End Homlessness

To serve vulnerable populations with housing service and facilitate data collection, reporting and analysis

Human Services
10
Central Arkansas Development Council

To provide services to low income individuals.

Community Improvement
11
New Generation Inc

Usher in leadership & policies that make arkansas the best place to live, work, and raise a family.

Community Improvement
12
Home Builders Assoc of Sw Louisiana

Improve standards in the building industry

Membership Benefit
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mississippi Heritage Trust; the most unlike its peers is Belzoni-Humphreys County Industrial Development Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
5/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Lamar State College: $310,400 · OtherLamar State CollegeBELZONI-HUMPHREYS COUNTY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC: $67,447 · OtherBELZONI-HUMPHREYS COUNTY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATIO…City of Crockett: $53,800 · OtherCity of CrockettHealthy Flavors Inc: $36,856 · OtherHealthy Flavors IncUrgent & Primary Care of Clarksdale: $27,225 · OtherMISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY: $25,740 · OtherCity of Zavalla: $25,000 · OtherTRENTON SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT: $23,280 · OtherWEAKLEY COUNTY SCHOOLS: $22,517 · Other+7 more: $76,105 · Other+7 moreEat Real Certified Inc: $206,351 · Public BenefitEat Real Certifie…WE CENTER: $100,000 · EducationWE CENTERUniversity of Kentucky Research Foundation: $90,000 · EducationUniversity of Ke…THE URBAN INSTITUTE: $111,000 · Social ScienceTHE URBAN…THE SOUTHWAY FOUNDATION: $25,000 · Community ImprovementFORGE INC: $25,000 · Community ImprovementHigher Purpose Hub: $15,000 · Community ImprovementFEDERATION OF APPALACHIAN HOUSING ENTERPRISES INC: $37,167 · Housing & ShelterFRAYSER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $7,500 · Housing & ShelterMISSISSIPPI HERITAGE TRUST: $25,000 · Arts & CultureArkansas United: $10,000 · Human ServicesSAFE HAVEN BABY BOXES INC: $8,036 · Human Services
Other$668,370Public Benefit$206,351Education$190,000Social Science$111,000Community Improvement$65,000Housing & Shelter$44,667Arts & Culture$25,000Human Services$18,036

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEat Real Certified Inc: $206,351 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetTHE URBAN INSTITUTE: $111,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWE CENTER: $100,000 over 1y, 51% of budgetUniversity of Kentucky Research Foundation: $90,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBELZONI-HUMPHREYS COUNTY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC: $67,447 over 2y, 60% of budgetFEDERATION OF APPALACHIAN HOUSING ENTERPRISES INC: $37,167 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE SOUTHWAY FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetFORGE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetHigher Purpose Hub: $15,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetArkansas United: $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetSAFE HAVEN BABY BOXES INC: $8,036 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFRAYSER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $7,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Eat Real Certified Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE URBAN INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds WE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds University of Kentucky Research Foundation ↗
  • Who funds BELZONI-HUMPHREYS COUNTY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FEDERATION OF APPALACHIAN HOUSING ENTERPRISES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SOUTHWAY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MISSISSIPPI HERITAGE TRUST ↗
  • Who funds FORGE INC ↗
  • Who funds Higher Purpose Hub ↗
  • Who funds Arkansas United ↗
  • Who funds SAFE HAVEN BABY BOXES INC ↗
  • Who funds FRAYSER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Local Initiatives Support CorporationNY8.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Local Initiatives Support Corporation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Communities Unlimited Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Communities Unlimited Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Communities Unlimited Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Communities Unlimited Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Communities Unlimited’s filings →

    More from the funding graph