· Public charity
Commonspirit Mountain Region
We extend the healing ministry of christ by caring for those who are ill and by nurturing the health of the people in our communities.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 9 grants below total $565,300 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $612,562 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $47,262 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k2 grants · $14k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $45k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $507k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NATIONAL WESTERN STOCK SHOW | $216,800 |
| COLORADO COLLEGE | $140,000 |
| MIDDLE PARK MEDICAL FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| SEEDS OF HOPE OF NORTHERN COLORADO | $50,000 |
| COLFAX MARATHON PARTNERSHIP | $25,000 |
| COLORADO PERSONALIZED EDUCATION PROGRAM FOR PHYSICIANS | $10,000 |
| REGIS UNIVERSITY | $10,000 |
| UTAH LEAGUE OF CITIES | $7,500 |
| BRAIN INJURY ASSOCATION OF CO | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +21% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.
21 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TWTHE WESTERN STOCK SHOW ASSOCIATION3× · 2022–2025 · $927k · revenue +27%
- TCTHE COLORADO COLLEGE5× · 2020–2025 · $610k · revenue +3%
- MPMIDDLE PARK MEDICAL FOUNDATION2× · 2023–2025 · $109k · revenue +449%
Funded once
- AHAmerican Heart Association Incgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $200k · revenue +33%
- MSMETROPOLITAN STATE UNIVERSITY OF DENVER FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $170k · revenue +172%
- COCity of Westminsterone grant, 2020 · $59k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
AIA Colorado,is the voice of the architecture profession in Colorado. Through advocacy, leadership development, education and resources for architects, the organization supports architecture professionals in designing a better world where…
The colorado chamber of commerce mission is to enhance the business climate of the state of colorado by promoting a positive legislative and regulatory environment and providing programs and services for its members, economic education,…
To equip partners and communities in colorado and across the nation with the resources, services and unbiased data needed to improve health and health care. we help communities, organizations and individuals identify opportunities to…
See schedule o colorado state university foundation assists in the promotion, development, and enhancement of facilities and educational programs and enhancements of faculty, students, and alumni of colorado state university (csu). this is…
The mission of colorado west healthcare system and community hospital is to improve the health and quality of life of the individuals and communities we serve.
a member based state association of over 100 companies targeting meeting planners & incentive buyers. members include bureaus, hotels, resorts, destination management companies, activity companies, & other meeting services. we are…
Estes Park Health Foundation increases community awareness of Estes Park Health (EPH). The Foundation develops, manages, and distributes funds to assist them in fulfilling their mission.
Peak health alliance is organized for the purpose of arranging for more cost-effective health insurance and health insurance administrative services for employers with a physical presence in rural colorado and their employees and…
We connect people, ideas, and nonprofits to make good happen. our vision is that all of jeffco is thriving.
To enhance the health and well-being of the communities we serve.
Support members' collaborative commitment to advance the health of their communities through affordable, accessible, high quality health care.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Colorado Center for the Advancement of Patient Safety and the most unlike its peers is Colorado Health Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 47 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE WESTERN STOCK SHOW ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds THE COLORADO COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds SEEDS OF HOPE OF NORTHERN COLORADO INC ↗
- Who funds METROPOLITAN STATE UNIVERSITY OF DENVER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MIDDLE PARK MEDICAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ONWARD A LEGACY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COLORADO HEALTH INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds NOURISH COLORADO ↗
- Who funds El Paso Pride Soccer Association ↗
- Who funds Colorado Physician Health Program Corporation ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds National Kidney Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds DELTA ETA BOULE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COLORADO CENTER FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF PATIENT SAFETY ↗
- Who funds THE MULLEN HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Colorado Golf Charities Inc ↗
- Who funds COLORADO PERSONALIZED EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds Rocky Mountain Adventist Healthcare Foundation ↗
- Who funds HIGHLANDS RANCH COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds REGIS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds COLFAX MARATHON PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds PARKER CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
- Who funds SCHOOL DISTRICT 12 EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC MEDICAL ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds CASTLE ROCK CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
- Who funds PARKER AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC HEALTH INITIATIVES COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DODGE CITY ROUNDUP INC ↗
- Who funds Craig Hospital ↗
- Who funds Summit County Chamber of Commerce ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DENVER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · Catholic Health Initiatives Colorado · Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of Colorado · The Denver Foundation · Rose Community Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · Portercare Adventist Health System · Trailhead Institute · Mile High United Way Inc · Early Milestones Colorado · Temple Hoyne Buell Foundation · Boettcher Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Commonspirit Mountain Region funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- National Fallen Firefighters Foundation — 24% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.