Skip to content

· Private foundation

Comer Science & Education Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$842k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Youth Development$13MScience & Tech$2.6MEmployment$2.3MEducation$1.9MPublic Safety & Disaster$839kHousing & Shelter$734kHuman Services$176kSocial Science$80kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $215k
  • $250k+2 grants · $600k
$15,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$69M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GARY COMER YOUTH CENTER$300,000
NETWORK FOR YOUNG ADULT SUCCESS$300,000
UNIVERSITY OF MAINE SYSTEM$147,879
SOUTH SHORE DRILL TEAM$66,667
CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION$15,000
CHAMPS MALE MENTORING$5,000
OPERATION NEIGHBORHOOD SAFETY$5,000
DO FOR SELF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION$1,000
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $159k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 5% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%North Light Community Center: $500 → 22%EMBRACE AND SHIFT INC: $150k → 8%YMCA of Metropolitan Chicago: $5k → 14%YMCA of Metropolitan Chicago: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
IL
WI
NY
MA
OR
IA
PA
CA
NE
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$17M · 24 repeat orgs$3.7M to everyone else

24 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
29

Total granted

$17M
$3.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+53%

Still filing today

63%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $149k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationEmploymentHuman ServicesPhilanthropyHealthYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GC
    GARY COMER YOUTH CENTER INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $13M · revenue +88% · 52% of their budget
  • NF
    Network For Young Adult Success
    6× · 2019–2024 · $2.3M · revenue +75% · 65% of their budget
  • NN
    NOBLE NETWORK OF CHARTER SCHOOLS
    3× · 2017–2019 · $367k · revenue +47%

Funded once

  • BI
    BITWISE INDUSTRIES INC
    one grant, 2023 · $2.4M
  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
    one grant, 2022 · $646k
  • EA
    EMBRACE AND SHIFT INC
    one grant, 2021 · $150k · revenue -85% · 45% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Chicago School of Professional Psychology

The Chicago School educates the next generation of change-makers in innovative theory and culturally competent practice to strengthen the integrated health of individuals, organizations, and communities.

Education
2
The Chicago Scholars Foundation

Chicago scholars is transforming the leadership landscape of our city by resolving the fundamental barriers to success for academically driven, first generation college students from under-resourced communities.

Education
3
Junior Achievement of Chicago

To inspire and prepare young people to succeed in a global economy

International
4
Thrive Chicago Nfp

Thrive chicago's mission is to prepare chicago's youth for a vibrant future by aligning efforts and outcomes from cradle to career.

Human Services
5
Chicago Youth Centers

To provide high-quality early learning and out-of-school time enrichment in under-resourced neighborhoods to holistically support children of all ages, their families, and their communities.

Youth Development
6
The University of Chicago Charter School Corporation

To Prepare Students for Success in Four-Year Colleges.

Education
7
A Better Chicago

A better chicago is changing how chicago fights poverty by investing in bold ideas that create opportunity for our youth.

Human Services
8
Chicagoland Chamber of Commerce

The chicagoland chamber of commerce combines the power of people, with our legacy of leadership and business advocacy, to drive a dynamic economy. we focus on delivering value for our members, making chicagoland a world-class place to live…

—
9
Chicago Collegiate Inc

To equip all students in grades six through twelve with the academic skills, intellectual habits and character traits to succeed in the college of their choice, strenghten their communities and change the world.

Education
10
Students Run Chicago
Health
11
Kipp Chicago Schools

The team at kipp chicago schools is guided by a simple, yet powerful mission: to create a network of excellent schools in chicago that teach our students the character and academic skills necessary to succeed in college and beyond, and to…

Education
12
The Chicago School - California Inc

The Chicago School educates the next generation of change-makers in innovative theory and culturally competent practice to strengthen the integrated health of individuals, organizations, and communities.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Gary Comer Youth Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Embrace and Shift Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/28
Grantees still filing
19/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GARY COMER YOUTH CENTER INC: $13,035,000 · Youth DevelopmentGARY COMER YOUTH CENTER INCBITWISE INDUSTRIES INC: $2,400,000 · OtherBITWISE INDUSTRIES INCSouth Shore Drill Team: $839,267 · OtherSouth Shore Drill TeamHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $646,142 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY+37 more: $747,403 · Other+37 moreNetwork For Young Adult Success: $2,265,000 · EducationNetwork For Young A…THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $1,100,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COL…NOBLE NETWORK OF CHARTER SCHOOLS: $366,739 · EducationNOBLE NETWORK OF CH…+6 more: $71,000 · EducationEMBRACE AND SHIFT INC: $150,000 · Human ServicesThe YMCA of Metropolitan Chicago: $8,000 · Human Services+1 more: $500 · Human ServicesBERKELEY GEOCHRONOLOGY CENTER: $102,468 · Science & TechHABITAT FOR HUMANITY CHICAGO: $86,400 · Housing & ShelterNorthwestern University: $60,000 · Recreation & Sports
Youth Development$13,035,000Other$4,632,812Education$3,802,739Human Services$158,500Science & Tech$102,468Housing & Shelter$86,400Recreation & Sports$60,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGARY COMER YOUTH CENTER INC: $13,035,000 over 7y, 52% of budgetNetwork For Young Adult Success: $2,265,000 over 6y, 65% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $1,100,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNOBLE NETWORK OF CHARTER SCHOOLS: $366,739 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetEMBRACE AND SHIFT INC: $150,000 over 1y, 45% of budgetBERKELEY GEOCHRONOLOGY CENTER: $102,468 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY CHICAGO: $86,400 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetNorthwestern University: $60,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $37,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetTEENS TAKE ON CLIMATE INC: $20,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetCHAMPS MALE MENTORING PROGRAM - CHIRISE: $12,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetThe YMCA of Metropolitan Chicago: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO COOK WORKFORCE PARTNERSHIP: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLADDER UP (F/K/A CITY-WIDE TAX ASSISTANCE PROGRAM): $7,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetLEADERSHIP GREATER CHICAGO: $5,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetThe Cara Program: $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MORGRIDGE INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetXCHANGE CHICAGO INC: $5,000 over 1y, 100% of budgetTeach for America Inc: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHICAGO COUNCIL ON GLOBAL AFFAIRS: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLa Rabida Children's Hospital: $3,244 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRing of Hope NFP: $2,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSKILLS FOR CHICAGO: $1,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINDIAN CHRISTIAN ORTHODOX NETWORK CHARITIES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetChicago Run: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe People's Music School: $800 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GARY COMER YOUTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Network For Young Adult Success ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds NOBLE NETWORK OF CHARTER SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds EMBRACE AND SHIFT INC ↗
  • Who funds BERKELEY GEOCHRONOLOGY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TEENS TAKE ON CLIMATE INC ↗
  • Who funds CHAMPS MALE MENTORING PROGRAM - CHIRISE ↗
  • Who funds The YMCA of Metropolitan Chicago ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO COOK WORKFORCE PARTNERSHIP ↗
  • Who funds LADDER UP (F/K/A CITY-WIDE TAX ASSISTANCE PROGRAM) ↗
  • Who funds LEADERSHIP GREATER CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds The Cara Program ↗
  • Who funds THE MORGRIDGE INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH INC ↗
  • Who funds XCHANGE CHICAGO INC ↗
  • Who funds Teach for America Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE CHICAGO COUNCIL ON GLOBAL AFFAIRS ↗
  • Who funds La Rabida Children's Hospital ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community TrustIL24.7× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · Robert R McCormick Foundation · Motorola Solutions Foundation · Fifth Third Chicagoland Foundation · Polk Bros Foundation Inc · Circle of Service Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Comer Science & Education Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Comer Science & Education Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Comer Science & Education Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Comer Science & Education Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 56 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Comer Science & Education’s filings →

    More from the funding graph