Skip to content

· Private foundation

Combs Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$57k
Granted FY2025still arriving
42
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What it funds
0182% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$79kHuman Services$29kEnvironment$22kFood & Nutrition$20kHealth$18kPhilanthropy$17kHousing & Shelter$6kRecreation & Sports$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 42 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k41 grants · $46k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
$500
Median grant
5
States reached
$65k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MUSIC FOR MINORS$11,000
SECOND HARVEST$6,000
COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY$6,000
YOSEMITE CONSERVANCY$5,000
Tahoe Truckee Community Foundation$3,000
Life Moves$2,500
SCHOLA CANTORUM$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Tahoe Fund$1,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$1,000
EL CAMINO HEALTH FOUNDATION$1,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$1,000
KQED$600
GIFFORDS FOR GUN CONTROL$600
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $26k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 10%COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY: $6k → 8%COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY: $5k → 8%COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY: $5k → 8%COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY: $5k → 8%COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY: $3k → 8%COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
NJ
CA
VA
SC
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$207k · 34 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

34 repeat relationships: 28 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
7

Total granted

$207k
$5k

Still filing today

35%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesInternationalRecreation & SportsHealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MF
    MUSIC FOR MINORS INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $59k · revenue +18%
  • CS
    COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW LOS ALTOS AND LOS ALTOS HILLS INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $25k · revenue +18%
  • YF
    YOSEMITE FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $18k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • SH
    SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • M
    MidPen
    2× · 2022–2023 · $1k
  • IM
    IEEE MEINDL MEMORIAL FUND
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
2
Community Foundation Santa Cruz County

To promote philanthropy to make santa cruz county a better place to live, now and in the future.we bring together people, ideas, and resources to inspire philanthropy and accomplish great things.

Philanthropy
3
Tahoe Community Foundation

The Foundation envisions a thriving community created through meaningful philanthropy, inclusive communication, and the willingness to explore possibilities together.

Education
4
Sierra Watch

Sierra watch secures conservation outcomes to protect the natural resources, mountain communities, and timeless values of the tahoe sierra.

Environment
5
The California Channel

To distribute public affairs and other educational information in order to create an electronic bridge between californians and their public officials, and, in the process educate a new generation of voting citizens and civic leaders who…

—
6
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
7
Santa Fe Community Foundation

The santa fe community foundation inspires philanthropic generosity, strengthens nonprofits, and fosters positive change to build a more vibrant, healthy, and resilient region. the foundation's vision is a thriving northern new mexico,…

Philanthropy
8
California Forward

Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…

Public Benefit
9
Truckee Trails Foundation Inc

The Truckee Trails Foundation (TTF) is working towards a system of trails and bikeways in and around Truckee, California that will connect people and places, reduce our community's dependence on automobiles, and improve our physical,…

Environment
10
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
11
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
12
Uc Riverside Foundation

To support educational, research and public functions and programs of the riverside campus of the university of california.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tahoe Truckee Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Sunbeam Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
15/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SECOND HARVEST: $18,000 · OtherSECOND HARVESTIndividual grant recipient: $9,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLIFEMOVES: $5,500 · OtherLIFEMOVESTAHOE TRUCKEE FOUNDATION: $5,400 · OtherTAHOE TRUCKEE FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $3,000 · OtherPATHWAYS HOSPICE: $3,000 · Other+38 more: $40,305 · Other+38 moreMUSIC FOR MINORS INC: $59,000 · Arts & CultureMUSIC FOR MINORS INCThe Schola Cantorum: $18,500 · Arts & CultureThe Schola Cantorum+1 more: $950 · Arts & CultureCOMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW LOS ALTOS AND LOS ALTOS HILLS INC: $25,250 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY SER…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,000 · Human ServicesYOSEMITE FOUNDATION: $17,500 · Recreation & SportsTAHOE TRUCKEE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $9,000 · Philanthropy+2 more: $350 · PhilanthropyTAHOE FUND: $4,000 · EnvironmentCHILDREN'S HEALTH COUNCIL INC: $3,100 · Health
Other$89,205Arts & Culture$78,450Human Services$26,250Recreation & Sports$17,500Philanthropy$9,350Environment$4,000Health$3,100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMUSIC FOR MINORS INC: $59,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW LOS ALTOS AND LOS ALTOS HILLS INC: $25,250 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetThe Schola Cantorum: $18,500 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetYOSEMITE FOUNDATION: $17,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTAHOE TRUCKEE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $9,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLIFEMOVES: $5,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTAHOE FUND: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEALTH COUNCIL INC: $3,100 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HOWARD UNIVERSITY: $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetACHIEVE TAHOE: $2,100 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKQED INC: $950 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRUCK OF LOVE: $700 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetDowntown Streets Inc: $400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUNBEAM FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLOS ALTOS MOUNTAIN VIEW COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MUSIC FOR MINORS INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW LOS ALTOS AND LOS ALTOS HILLS INC ↗
  • Who funds The Schola Cantorum ↗
  • Who funds YOSEMITE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TAHOE TRUCKEE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LIFEMOVES ↗
  • Who funds TAHOE FUND ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HEALTH COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HOWARD UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ACHIEVE TAHOE ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds KQED INC ↗
  • Who funds TRUCK OF LOVE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA15.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The Corrigan-Walla Foundation · The George and Judy Marcus Family Foundation · The George and Judy Marcus Family Foundation II · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Combs Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Combs Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 56 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Combs’ filings →

    More from the funding graph