Skip to content

· Private foundation

Colt Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$677k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$542k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2024 to 2025.

Philanthropy$552kReligion$80kHuman Services$55kRecreation & Sports$42kEducation$22kInternational$15kYouth Development$15k
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $95k
  • $250k+1 grant · $542k
$5,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COLT FAMILY FOUNDATION MONTANA$542,420
FRESH LIFE CHURCH$40,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
RANCH CHURCH$10,000
SANTA YNEZ VALLEY CHRISTIAN ACADEMY$10,000
BIBLE CENTERED MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL$10,000
ANGELS FOSTER CARE$10,000
PRIORITY LIVING INCBETWEEN TWO TREES$5,000
FELLOWSHIP ALLIANCE CHURCH$5,000
TIM TEBOW FOUNDATION$5,000
DREAM ADAPTIVE RECREATION$5,000
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$5,000
YOUTH WITH A MISSION MONTANA$5,000
Individual grant recipient$3,350
WONDERFULLY MADE$2,510
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $27k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ANGELS FOSTER CARE: $10k → 14%THE PEARL PROJECT: $2k → 16%ANGELS FOSTER CARE: $10k → 14%WONDERFULLY MADE: $3k → 14%WONDERFULLY MADE: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

20%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$156k · 11 repeat orgs$625k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +55% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
3

Total granted

$156k
$24k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
+26%

Still filing today

55%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 11% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $601k went to new ones.

50%100%’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’24’25
Human ServicesPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsEducationReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SY
    SANTA YNEZ VALLEY CHRISTIAN ACADEMY
    2× · 2024–2025 · $20k · revenue +4%
  • DA
    DREAM ADAPTIVE RECREATION INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $10k · revenue +71%
  • TT
    TIM TEBOW FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $10k · revenue +55%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $20k
  • TP
    The Pearl Project Incgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $2k · revenue +26%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christian Family Care Agency Inc

The mission of christian family care is to strengthen families and serve at-risk children in the name of jesus christ. the outcome of our work results in building flourishing families and communities focusing on three pillars: preserve,…

Human Services
2
Refuge for Prodigals International Bible Ministries Inc
Religion
3
Wounded Spirits Ministries

The focus of the ministry is to establish christian camps and retreats that will reach men and women who have been affected by post traumatic stress disorder with the gospel of jesus christ, and equip them to recognize, manage, and…

Recreation & Sports
4
Trinity Ranch Ministries Inc
Health
5
WIRED4SPORT

wired4sport resources are uniquely designed by sportspeople for sportspeople to strengthen your love for God, to train in godliness and to put your faith into practice. Unlike other resources, these strategies will enable you to apply your…

Education
6
Valkyrie Ranch Inc

Our mission at valkyrie ranch is to support special operations veterans and their families with healing, connection, and lifelong care while also giving back to the ranching community around us. through outdoor retreats, recovery programs,…

Human Services
7
Camp Grace

Create faith-filled environment for chil

Youth Development
8
Victory Family Services
Human Services
9
Montana Pediatric Cancer Foundation
Philanthropy
10
Called to Love

We provide a retreat for foster and adoptive moms

Human Services
11
Safe Haven Counseling Associates in

Biblical counseling

—
12
God's Light in the Darkness Foundation
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tim Tebow Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Colt Family Foundation Montana. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COLT FAMILY FOUNDATION MONTANA: $542,420 · PhilanthropyCOLT FAMILY FOUNDATION MONTANA+1 more: $10,000 · PhilanthropyFRESH LIFE CHURCH: $40,000 · OtherFRESH LIFE CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recip…Individual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recip…BCM INTERNATIONAL INC: $15,000 · OtherBCM INTERNATIONAL INCIndividual grant recipient: $11,350 · OtherIndividual grant recip…YOUTH WITH A MISSION OF MONTANA A CORPORATION: $10,000 · OtherYOUTH WITH A MISSION O…PRIORITY LIVING INCBETWEEN TWO TREES: $10,000 · OtherPRIORITY LIVING INCBET…RANCH CHURCH INC: $10,000 · OtherRANCH CHURCH INC+6 more: $9,259 · Other+6 moreANGELS FOSTER CARE OF SANTA BARBARA: $20,000 · Human ServicesWonderfully Made: $4,530 · Human ServicesThe Pearl Project Inc: $2,000 · Human ServicesSANTA YNEZ VALLEY CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $20,000 · EducationSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $15,000 · ReligionDREAM ADAPTIVE RECREATION INC: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsABS PARK: $1,550 · Recreation & Sports
Philanthropy$552,420Other$155,609Human Services$26,530Education$20,000Religion$15,000Recreation & Sports$11,550

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOLT FAMILY FOUNDATION MONTANA: $542,420 over 1y, 100% of budgetSANTA YNEZ VALLEY CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $20,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetANGELS FOSTER CARE OF SANTA BARBARA: $20,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDREAM ADAPTIVE RECREATION INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTIM TEBOW FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWonderfully Made: $4,530 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetThe Pearl Project Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COLT FAMILY FOUNDATION MONTANA ↗
  • Who funds SANTA YNEZ VALLEY CHRISTIAN ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds ANGELS FOSTER CARE OF SANTA BARBARA ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds DREAM ADAPTIVE RECREATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TIM TEBOW FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Wonderfully Made ↗
  • Who funds The Pearl Project Inc ↗
  • Who funds ABS PARK ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA8.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Colt Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Colt Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • The Pearl Project Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Colt Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Colt Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Colt Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph