Skip to content

· Private foundation

Colorado State Bank Foundation 61a014010

Its FY2021 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$24k
Granted FY2020
16
Grants FY2020
1
States reached
$3k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

97% of Colorado State Bank Foundation 61a014010’s FY2021 grant dollars went to The Denver Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2021 names 3 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2020, the last year Colorado State Bank Foundation 61a014010 named its own grantees at scale: 13 organizations, $24k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

13
’20
3
’21

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2021.

Philanthropy$351kHuman Services$16kHealth$6kFood & Nutrition$3kCivil Rights$3kHousing & Shelter$2kEducation$1kOther$0
02FY2020 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
I HAVE A DREAM FOUNDATION$2,500
EXTENDED HANDS OF HOPE$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,000
COLORADO COMMUNITY SHELTER PROVIDERS INC$2,000
THERE WITH CARE$2,000
HANDS OF THE CARPENTER$2,000
FAMILY TREE INC$1,500
DOMINICAN HOME HEALTH AGENCY INC$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,000
THE YESS INSTITUTE$1,000
WEDONTWASTE$1,000
FATHER WOODY'S HAVEN OF HOPE$1,000
SAFEHOUSE DENVER$1,000
LABORATORY TO COMBAT HUMAN TRAFFICKING$1,000
COLORADO CENTER FOR THE BLIND$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–21, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 36% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%FAMILY TREE INC: $2k → 7%THERE WITH CARE: $2k → 12%DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES RESOURCE CENT: $2k → 7%LABORATORY TO COMBAT HUMAN TRAFFICKING: $1k → 12%HANDS OF THE CARPENTER: $2k → 7%HANDS OF THE CARPENTER: $2k → 7%SAFEHOUSE DENVER: $1k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

27%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$10k · 3 repeat orgs$26k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +636% since the first grant, against +31% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2020, 0 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call). Read against FY2020, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
17

Total granted

$10k
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+636%
+31%

Still filing today

67%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 46% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    SparkHope Automotive
    2× · 2020–2021 · $4k · revenue +120%
  • CC
    COLORADO CENTER FOR THE BLIND
    2× · 2020–2021 · $3k · revenue +636%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2020–2021 · $3k

Funded once

  • EH
    EXTENDED HANDS OF HOPE
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue -81%
  • IH
    I HAVE A DREAM FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • CC
    COLORADO COMMUNITY SHELTER PROVIDERS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +57%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Family Housing Network of Fort Collins Inc

Faith Family Hospitality's mission is to support families experiencing homelessness to achieve sustainable self-sufficiency in a timely and dignified manner. This interfaith volunteer effort coordinates the work of 30 diverse Fort Collins…

Human Services
2
Streets Hope

Street's Hope provides direct services to human trafficking survivors in Colorado. Services including housing assisstance, housing support and a range of behavioral health services.

Human Services
3
Colorado Homeless Families Inc

CHF assists working families in their quest to go from homelessness to self-sufficiency for life.

Housing & Shelter
4
Denver Children's Home

Denver children's home restores hope and health to traumatized children and families through a comprehensive array of therapeutic, educational, and community-based services.

Health
5
Domestic Violence Initiative for Women With Disabilities

Empowering victims and creating a bridge to close the gap for people with disabilities through discovery of self-resiliency by providing support and services.

—
6
Domestic Violence Intervention Services

See schedule oadvancing physical and emotional safety by reducing the impact and occurrence of sexual and domestic violence, human trafficking and stalking through inclusive intervention and prevention services for children, youth, and…

Human Services
7
Julia Greeley Home Inc

Julia greeley home, inc. serves single unaccompanied women in the denver metro area between the ages of 18 and 64 who are struggling with chronic or repeated homelessness. the program fulfills existing gaps between overnight short term…

Housing & Shelter
8
Denverworks Inc

To empower the unemployed and those with barriers to employment to become self-supporting through job preparation and placement.

Employment
9
Colorado Coalition for the Homeless

The mission of the colorado coalition for the homeless is to work collaboratively toward the prevention of homelessness and the creation of lasting solutions for families, children, and individuals who are experiencing or at-risk of…

Human Services
10
Urban Outreach Denver

Urban Outreach Denver exists to connect people to God and to a community of support by caring for both short-term and long-term needs in the areas of food, clothing, shlter, medical care, education and job preparation.

Human Services
11
Sunshine Home Share Colorado

Sunshine home share colorado ensures quality of life for older adults and strengthens communities through a safe home-sharing model, supportive economic empowerment, and connections to resources and services.

Housing & Shelter
12
Fort Collins Habitat for Humanity

Seeking to put god's love into action; habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities, and hope to realize our vision of a world where everyone has a decent place to live. fort collins habitat for humanity adheres…

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Colorado Community Shelter Providers Inc; the most unlike its peers is Adams County Emergency Food Bank. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
11/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE DENVER FOUNDATION: $349,610 · PhilanthropyTHE DENVER FOUNDATION+1 more: $1,000 · PhilanthropyEXTENDED HANDS OF HOPE: $2,500 · OtherI HAVE A DREAM FOUNDATION: $2,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $2,500 · OtherCOLORADO COMMUNITY SHELTER PROVIDERS INC: $2,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $2,000 · OtherFLORENCE CRITTENTON SERVICES OF: $2,000 · OtherA LITTLE HELP: $1,500 · OtherCOMMUNITY MINISTRY OF: $1,500 · OtherSparkHope Automotive: $4,000 · Human ServicesTHERE WITH CARE: $2,000 · Human ServicesDEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES RESOURCE CENTER: $1,500 · Human ServicesFAMILY TREE INC: $1,500 · Human ServicesSAFEHOUSE DENVER INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesLABORATORY TO COMBAT HUMAN TRAFFICKING: $1,000 · Human ServicesCOLORADO CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $3,000 · HealthDOMINICAN HOME HEALTH AGENCY INC: $1,500 · HealthWEDONTWASTE INC: $1,000 · Food & NutritionADAMS COUNTY EMERGENCY FOOD BANK: $500 · Food & NutritionThe YESS Institute: $1,000 · Recreation & Sports
Philanthropy$350,610Other$16,500Human Services$11,000Health$4,500Food & Nutrition$1,500Recreation & Sports$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE DENVER FOUNDATION: $349,610 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSparkHope Automotive: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOLORADO CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEXTENDED HANDS OF HOPE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCOLORADO COMMUNITY SHELTER PROVIDERS INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHERE WITH CARE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES RESOURCE CENTER: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY TREE INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDOMINICAN HOME HEALTH AGENCY INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAFEHOUSE DENVER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHAVEN OF HOPE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe YESS Institute: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLABORATORY TO COMBAT HUMAN TRAFFICKING: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWEDONTWASTE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetADAMS COUNTY EMERGENCY FOOD BANK: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Denver FoundationCO23.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Denver Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Hill Foundation Wells Fargo Bank Na · Nathan B & Florence R Burt Foundation · Schlessman Foundation Inc · Anschutz Family Foundation · Rose Community Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · Jk Mullen Foundation · The Anschutz Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Colorado State Bank Foundation 61a014010 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Colorado State Bank Foundation 61a014010. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Colorado State Bank Foundation 61a014010?

    Find your warmest path to Colorado State Bank Foundation 61a014010 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Colorado State Bank Foundation 61a014010’s filings →

    More from the funding graph