Skip to content

· Private foundation

Colorado Masons Benevolent Fund Association

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$227k
Granted FY2025still arriving
39
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$29k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$1.5MReligion$561kPublic Benefit$120kYouth Development$113kArts & Culture$22kEmployment$20kCivil Rights$10kMembership Benefit$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 39 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k32 grants · $76k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $152k
$1,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COLORADO SCHOOL OF MINES$29,250
COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY$28,750
UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER$28,750
UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO COLO SPRINGS$21,500
COLORADO MESA UNIVERSITY$18,250
UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN COLORADO$14,500
UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO BOULDER$10,750
ADAMS STATE COLLEGE$7,500
METROPOLITAN STATE COLLEGE OF DENVE$7,250
PUEBLO COMMUNITY COLLEGE$7,200
COLORADO COLLEGE$7,000
NORTHWESTERN COMMUNITY COLLEGE$7,000
COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF DENVER$6,167
FORT LEWIS COLLEGE$3,750
CENTURY 190$3,600
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 46% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%CENTRAL 6: $18k → 6%NEVADA 4: $13k → 7%LUPTON 119: $15k → 9%CORINTHAIN 35: $21k → 11%ADAMS STATE COLLEGE: $15k → 17%COLORADO COLLEGE: $20k → 9%COLORADO MESA UNIVERSITY: $56k → 11%FORT LEWIS COLLEGE: $15k → 12%CENTRAL 6: $13k → 7%COLORADO COLLEGE: $18k → 9%COLORADO MESA UNIVERSITY: $33k → 11%FORT LEWIS COLLEGE: $15k → 12%COLORADO COLLEGE: $17k → 9%COLORADO MESA UNIVERSITY: $21k → 11%ECKERT 136: $21k → 15%COLORADO COLLEGE: $14k → 9%COLORADO MESA UNIVERSITY: $18k → 11%COLORADO SCHOOL OF MINES: $33k → 7%COLORADO MESA UNIVERSITY: $15k → 11%COLORADO SCHOOL OF MINES: $29k → 7%CENTURY 190: $30k → 9%COLORADO MESA UNIVERSITY: $12k → 11%COLORADO SCHOOL OF MINES: $29k → 7%CENTURY 190: $24k → 9%COLORADO SCHOOL OF MINES: $25k → 7%CENTURY 190: $21k → 9%COLORADO SCHOOL OF MINES: $21k → 7%CENTURY 190: $18k → 9%COLORADO SCHOOL OF MINES: $21k → 7%CENTURY 190: $18k → 9%COLORADO SCHOOL OF MINES: $18k → 7%CENTURY 190: $17k → 9%PUEBLO COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $35k → 15%COLORADO SCHOOL OF MINES: $16k → 7%CENTURY 190: $16k → 9%RAMAH 165: $14k → 9%CENTURY 190: $14k → 9%FOUNTAIN VALLEY 191: $14k → 9%NEW FRONTIER 134: $19k → 12%NEW FRONTIER 134: $14k → 12%UNVERSITY OF COLORADO COLORADO SPGS: $28k → 9%LIBERTY 134: $22k → 12%UNVERSITY OF COLORADO COLORADO SPGS: $25k → 9%LIBERTY 134: $13k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO COLO SPRINGS: $22k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO COLO SPRINGS: $21k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO COLO SPGS: $14k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER: $29k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.5M · 106 repeat orgs$149k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against +1% for those funded once.

106 repeat relationships: 28 still active in FY2025, 78 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

106
79

Total granted

$2.5M
$140k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+1%

Still filing today

3%
1%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE COLORADO COLLEGE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $104k · revenue +39%
  • RU
    REGIS UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2017–2018 · $17k · revenue +5%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF DENVER
    2× · 2017–2020 · $7k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • C3
    CORINTHAIN 35
    one grant, 2023 · $21k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO COLO SPGS
    one grant, 2019 · $14k
  • CC
    CRIPPLE CREEK 96
    one grant, 2018 · $9k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Metropolitan State University of Denver

To promote the general welfare and development of the metropolitan state university of denver.

Education
2
Rocky Mountain College

Rocky mountain college educates future leaders through liberal arts and professional programs that cultivate critical thinking, creative expression, ethical decision making, informed citizenship, and professional excellence.

Education
3
Columbia College

Columbia College improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
4
Coker University

Coker university is a student-centered, comprehensive university. it is dedicated to providing every student an academic curriculum based upon a uniformly excellent liberal arts core that enhances the structured development of key personal…

Education
5
Aurora University

To provide post-secondary undergraduate and graduate education.

Education
6
Colgate University

Colgate university's mission is to provide a demanding, expansive educational experience to a select group of diverse, talented, intellectually sophisticated students who are capable of challenging themselves, their peers and their…

Education
7
Concordia University

Concordia university nebraska's mission is to be an excellent academic and christ-centered community equipping men and women for lives of learning, service and leadership in the church and the world. we primarily do this by providing…

Education
8
Central College

Central college is a private liberal arts institution dedicated to the four year undergraduate experience.

Education
9
Colorado Health Institute
Health
10
Washington College

Washington college challenges and inspires emerging citizen leaders to discover lives of purpose and passion.

Education
11
Sierra Nevada College

To combine the liberal arts and professional preparedness through an interdisciplinary curriculum.

—
12
Cornell College

To create a space where students can develop intellectual curiosity, creativity and moral courage.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Northern Colorado; the most unlike its peers is Regis University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 196 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
4/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY: $322,550 · OtherCOLORADO STATE UNIVERSITYCOLORADO SCHOOL OF MINES: $207,750 · OtherCOLORADO SCHOOL OF MINESCOLORADO MESA UNIVERSITY: $166,800 · OtherCOLORADO MESA UNIVERSITYCENTURY 190: $162,750 · OtherCENTURY 190UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN COLORADO: $98,000 · Other+188 more: $1,550,991 · Other+188 moreTHE COLORADO COLLEGE: $103,600 · EducationREGIS UNIVERSITY: $16,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF DENVER: $7,000 · Education
Other$2,508,841Education$127,100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE COLORADO COLLEGE: $103,600 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetREGIS UNIVERSITY: $16,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DENVER: $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORADO NORTHWESTERN COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE COLORADO COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds REGIS UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Roof F T CharNV16× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Roof F T Char · Daniels Fund · Colorado Gives Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Colorado Masons Benevolent Fund Association funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Colorado Masons Benevolent Fund Association. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Colorado Masons Benevolent Fund Association?

    Find your warmest path to Colorado Masons Benevolent Fund Association through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 196 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Colorado Masons Benevolent Fund Association’s filings →

    More from the funding graph