Skip to content

· Private foundation

Cohen-Schultz Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$32k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$54kPhilanthropy$51kEducation$40kEnvironment$31kHealth$23kHuman Services$23kHousing & Shelter$8kFood & Nutrition$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$427k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GREATER FRANKENMUTH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$6,000
VARIOUS 501(C)(3) ORGANIZATIONS$5,933
LAND TRUST OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
LAND TRUST OF SANTA BARBARA COUNTY$2,520
SANTA CRUZ SHAKESPEARE$2,500
SAN FRANCISCO BALLET$2,500
ANIMAL ASSISTED HAPPINESS$2,041
SECOND HARVEST$1,250
BLOOD CANCER UNITED$1,040
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY EAST BAY$1,010
POST$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 57% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%TRUE CONNECTIONS COMMUNITY PROGRAMS INC: $3k → 16%TRUE CONNECTIONS COMMUNITY PROGRAMS INC: $2k → 16%TRUE CONNECTIONS COMMUNITY PROGRAMS INC: $1k → 16%SUNNYVALE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $2k → 8%SUNNYVALE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $1k → 8%SUNNYVALE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $1k → 8%SUNNYVALE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $500 → 8%ANIMAL ASSISTED HAPPINESS: $500 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
SD
IN
CA
MO
VA
AZ
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 12% of Cohen-Schultz Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Cohen-Schultz Charitable Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$178k · 17 repeat orgs$36k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +87% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
16

Total granted

$178k
$32k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+87%
+13%

Still filing today

41%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureEnvironmentInternationalAnimalsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    SAN FRANCISCO BALLET ASSOCIATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $24k · revenue +37%
  • AA
    Animal Assisted Happiness Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $17k · revenue +173%
  • LT
    LAND TRUST OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
    5× · 2021–2025 · $15k · revenue +310%

Funded once

  • ME
    MONTAGUE ELEM SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $7k
  • WE
    WESTWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • AB
    AVON BREAST CANCER CRUSADE
    one grant, 2017 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Francisco Challenge dba AmericaOne
Recreation & Sports
2
Sempervirens Fund

To ensure coast redwood forests in the santa cruz mountains thrive for generations to come. since 1900, sempervirens has protected more than 36,000 acres. learn more about our mission, vision, and strategic plan through 2030 at:…

Environment
3
The San Francisco Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To ensure every companion animal has access to quality medical care, compassionate shelter, and a loving home.

Animals
4
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
5
University of California San Francisco Foundation

Organization's mission ====================== the university of california, san francisco(ucsf) is among the world's leading universities dedicated to advancing health worldwide through biomedical research, graduate-level education in the…

Education
6
Sustainable Conservation

Sustainable Conservation advances the collaborative stewardship of Californias land, air, and water for the benefit of nature and people. For over three decades, Sustainable Conservation has built coalitions of people with different…

Environment
7
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
8
Sutter Bay Medical Foundation

Mission statement: mission: caring for our patients first and our people always. vision: to be the most comprehensive, integrated and connected health system for getting and staying well. values: excellence - we deliver high-quality,…

Health
9
Children's Hospital & Research Center At Oakland

The mission of children's hospital & research center at oakland is to protect and advance the health and well-being of children through clinical care, teaching and research.

Health
10
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
11
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
12
Habitat for Humanity Greater San Francisco

Habitat for humanity greater san francisco builds and sustains affordable homeownership opportunities for families in marin, san francisco and san mateo counties.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Land Trust of Santa Cruz County; the most unlike its peers is Crazy Horse Memorial Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
10/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VARIOUS 501(C)(3) ORGANIZATIONS: $35,493 · OtherVARIOUS 501(C)(3) ORGANIZATIONSSANTA CRUZ SHAKESPEARE: $16,560 · OtherSANTA CRUZ SHAKESPEAREIndividual grant recipient: $12,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPOST: $11,000 · OtherPOSTBRACHER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $9,062 · OtherBRACHER ELEMENTARY SCHOOLBRIARWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $8,995 · OtherBRIARWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOLTHETA XI FOUNDATION: $8,000 · OtherTHETA XI FOUNDATIONMONTAGUE ELEM SCHOOL: $7,444 · OtherMONTAGUE ELEM SCHOOLWESTWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $5,110 · Other+15 more: $25,859 · Other+15 moreTHE FRANKENMUTH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $26,076 · PhilanthropyTHE FRANKENMU…The Livestrong Foundation: $2,080 · PhilanthropyThe Livestron…Animal Assisted Happiness Inc: $16,603 · Human ServicesAnimal Assis…TRUE CONNECTIONS COMMUNITY PROGRAMS INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesTRUE CONNECT…SUNNYVALE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $4,022 · Human ServicesSUNNYVALE CO…SAN FRANCISCO BALLET ASSOCIATION: $24,425 · Arts & CultureSAN FRANCISC…CRAZY HORSE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $1,500 · Arts & CultureCRAZY HORSE …LAND TRUST OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY: $14,500 · EnvironmentNATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS LILITH FUND: $1,500 · EnvironmentAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NATAL INC: $1,030 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,000 · InternationalHABITAT FOR HUMANITY EAST BAY SILICON VALLEY: $1,710 · Housing & Shelter
Other$139,523Philanthropy$28,156Human Services$26,625Arts & Culture$25,925Environment$16,000International$2,030Housing & Shelter$1,710

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE FRANKENMUTH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $26,076 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO BALLET ASSOCIATION: $24,425 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAnimal Assisted Happiness Inc: $16,603 over 9y, 1.0% of budgetLAND TRUST OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY: $14,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHETA XI FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetTRUE CONNECTIONS COMMUNITY PROGRAMS INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetSUNNYVALE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $4,022 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Livestrong Foundation: $2,080 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY EAST BAY SILICON VALLEY: $1,710 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCRAZY HORSE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS LILITH FUND: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHWEST WILDLIFE CONSERVATION CENTER: $1,300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,040 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NATAL INC: $1,030 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE FRANKENMUTH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO BALLET ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Animal Assisted Happiness Inc ↗
  • Who funds LAND TRUST OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds THETA XI FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TRUE CONNECTIONS COMMUNITY PROGRAMS INC ↗
  • Who funds SUNNYVALE COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds The Livestrong Foundation ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY EAST BAY SILICON VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds CRAZY HORSE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS LILITH FUND ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWEST WILDLIFE CONSERVATION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF NATAL INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

AbbVie FoundationIL15.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: AbbVie Foundation · The Intuit Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cohen-Schultz Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cohen-Schultz Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Cohen-Schultz Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Cohen-Schultz Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Cohen-Schultz’s filings →

    More from the funding graph